Ian Rapoport, speaking during breaking coverage on NFL Network, explained that the Los Angeles Rams were persistent and aggressive in their pursuit of defensive star Myles Garrett. The core point of Rapoport’s update was that the Rams were not just one of several teams loosely monitoring the situation—they were the team most clearly committed to making a deal happen, and they continued to press forward until it ultimately came together.
Rapoport’s comments place special emphasis on the Rams’ sustained efforts rather than a momentary effort or short window. In the narrative described, the Rams consistently worked through the process and stayed engaged as discussions evolved, suggesting a prolonged commitment to overcoming obstacles typically involved in player trade scenarios—particularly when the player in question is highly valued and widely sought after.
The way Rapoport frames the Rams’ involvement indicates that the organization treated Garrett as a priority target and structured their approach accordingly. Instead of stepping back after initial talks or waiting for other options to develop, the Rams kept “pushing” in a way that implies they maintained momentum and leverage. This matters because Garrett is the kind of impact player whose availability would naturally draw multiple suitors. A team that stays the course—while others may hesitate—often becomes the one that eventually turns negotiations into a completed transaction.
While Rapoport’s statement is brief, it carries important implications for how teams viewed the trade landscape. By saying the Rams were “the team in on Myles Garrett,” Rapoport effectively highlights that Los Angeles held a stronger, more determined interest than competitors. He also signals that their engagement was active rather than passive, meaning they likely prepared offers, kept conversations moving, and remained consistent in their pursuit until the trade became reality.
This also underscores the importance of patience and persistence in NFL front-office decision-making. Trades involving top-tier talent frequently require timing, alignment between teams, and a deal structure that satisfies both sides. Rapoport’s description suggests the Rams were able to navigate that complexity better than other contenders, which may reflect their ability to remain flexible while still holding firm on their goal.
From a team-building perspective, the Rams adding Garrett would represent an attempt to elevate their defense by bringing in a proven, game-changing player. Garrett’s reputation as a difference-maker would naturally increase the urgency for teams that believe they can contend immediately. Rapoport’s characterization of the Rams’ efforts implies that Los Angeles saw the window to secure Garrett as worth pursuing relentlessly.
Additionally, Rapoport’s remark indicates that the Rams’ pursuit wasn’t incidental. Being “the team” in on a player in a high-profile situation suggests that the organization believed strongly in the fit and value of Garrett, and that their internal evaluation and strategy were aligned with making the move happen. The fact that “it happened” implies the persistence paid off—turning a target into an acquisition.
In summary, Ian Rapoport stated that during his breaking news coverage on NFL Network, the Los Angeles Rams were the standout team committed to Myles Garrett. Rapoport emphasized that they kept pushing throughout the process and did not lose momentum, ultimately resulting in the trade taking place. Source: Ian Rapoport.
Ian Rapoport: From our breaking news coverage on @NFLNetwork: The #Rams were THE team in on Myles Garrett, and they kept pushing until it happened.. #breaking
— @RapSheet May 1, 2026
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
