BREAKING: Pakistan Says Abraham Accords Won’t Be Signed Until Palestine Recognized Pre-1967 With Quds Al Sharif

By | May 30, 2026

Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar has delivered a clear condition for any future participation in the Abraham Accords, stating that his country will not sign until Palestine is recognized under a specific framework. Speaking from Washington, D.C., Dar linked Pakistan’s position to the longstanding political goal of a two-state outcome anchored in the pre-1967 borders.

According to the statement, Pakistan will only move forward with signing the Abraham Accords if Palestine is recognized in accordance with the pre-1967 model and if Quds Al Sharif is designated as its capital. The remarks indicate that Pakistan’s stance is not merely symbolic, but tied to concrete territorial and sovereignty criteria associated with the conflict and its proposed resolution.

The intervention from Dar highlights how regional diplomacy is increasingly shaped by the question of recognition for Palestinian statehood and the status of Jerusalem. By explicitly naming Quds Al Sharif as the capital, Pakistan is emphasizing a core element of Palestinian and broader international positions that treat East Jerusalem as integral to any future Palestinian state. The condition set by Pakistan suggests that issues surrounding Jerusalem remain central to how countries in the wider Middle East and beyond approach normalization efforts.

Dar’s comments also underline that Pakistan views the Abraham Accords not as a standalone diplomatic achievement, but as an arrangement whose legitimacy depends on progress toward the resolution of the Palestinian issue. The phrasing implies that normalization between Israel and certain Arab states cannot be finalized for Pakistan while Palestinians still have not received recognition meeting the pre-1967 framework.

The announcement from Washington, D.C. places Pakistan’s position in an international setting, reflecting that the Abraham Accords and related negotiations continue to draw attention from governments operating far beyond the immediate region. By delivering the message from the U.S. capital, Dar signals that Pakistan intends its condition to be understood by key international stakeholders who have been involved in or influenced by normalization talks.

While the statement is presented as a firm declaration of what Pakistan will do—or will not do—it also functions as a negotiating benchmark. It suggests that unless Palestinian recognition aligns with Pakistan’s stated parameters—pre-1967 borders and Quds Al Sharif as capital—Pakistan will maintain its refusal to sign. In other words, Pakistan is not offering a partial engagement pathway; it is making acceptance of a defined political end-state a prerequisite for moving forward.

This approach reflects Pakistan’s broader historical and political orientation on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The emphasis on recognition and borders corresponds with how Pakistan frames legitimacy in international agreements: it appears to insist that any regional agreements must reflect the status and rights of Palestinians, not only the normalization of relations.

The statement also suggests potential friction in diplomatic planning. If other parties involved in the Abraham Accords do not treat Palestinian recognition and the Jerusalem question as immediate conditions, Pakistan’s position could remain a durable obstacle to any expansion of signatories that includes Pakistan. At the same time, Dar’s framing makes clear that Pakistan’s opposition is not simply against normalization in principle, but against normalization that does not include the specific recognition and capital arrangements Pakistan demands.

Overall, the news indicates a direct link between Pakistan’s willingness to sign the Abraham Accords and its insistence on a defined recognition process for Palestine. By setting the pre-1967 model as the baseline and by calling for Quds Al Sharif to be the capital, Pakistan is making its participation contingent on Palestinian statehood being acknowledged in a way it considers consistent with the core requirements of a lasting political settlement.

Source: Source

News Source

SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.

SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *