The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has taken urgent legal steps to protect suspected assets linked to alleged misconduct by a former employee connected to Tembisa Hospital. According to the SIU’s action, it has obtained both a preservation order and an interim interdict relating to an immovable property valued at R6.4 million.
In parallel, the SIU’s court application also concerns pension benefits reportedly valued at R1.8 million. These pension benefits belong to Duduzile Nkosazana Nobungwana, described as a former supply chain clerk at Tembisa Hospital. The SIU’s move indicates that the agency is seeking to prevent the disposal, transfer, or dissipation of the property and associated financial interests while investigations proceed.
The matter has been framed as part of the SIU’s mandate to investigate potential corruption or other unlawful conduct connected to public resources and public service systems. The supply chain environment is often a high-risk area because procurement and inventory functions can influence the award of contracts, buying processes, and the management of goods and services. As a result, when officials in these roles are suspected of wrongdoing, regulators frequently pursue asset-protection remedies early in the process.
A preservation order is typically designed to maintain the status quo. It freezes the relevant asset(s) so that they remain available should a court later find that they are connected to unlawful activity and should be recoverable. This is important in cases where officials might otherwise attempt to sell, restructure, or move assets beyond reach before final determinations are made.
An interim interdict serves a similar purpose but is more focused on stopping certain actions in the short term. By obtaining such an order, the SIU aims to halt steps that could frustrate the investigation or undermine possible future recovery actions. Together, these two legal instruments show the SIU’s intention to act swiftly and to secure effective remedies before evidence is fully tested in court.
The property at the center of the SIU application is described in terms of its market value, being worth R6.4 million. The pension benefits at issue, valued at R1.8 million, represent a second stream of financial interest that the SIU is seeking to safeguard. The dual focus on both fixed property and retirement-related benefits suggests that investigators may believe there is a link between alleged misconduct and both visible and less immediately liquid assets.
The SIU also notes that Nobungwana resigned from her position as a supply chain clerk at Tembisa Hospital. This detail is relevant because resignations sometimes occur when employees anticipate disciplinary or legal scrutiny, or when investigations begin to intensify. However, the SIU’s orders are not dependent on continued employment. Instead, the emphasis is on protecting assets that may be connected to wrongdoing, regardless of whether the implicated person remains employed.
By pursuing an order that freezes the immovable property and securing an interim interdict connected to pension benefits, the SIU is effectively restricting Nobungwana’s ability to deal with those assets during the ongoing legal process. This ensures that if the SIU’s investigation confirms that the property and benefits are linked to corrupt or unlawful conduct, the assets can remain available for potential recovery or forfeiture processes.
The SIU’s intervention underscores the broader efforts by law enforcement and oversight bodies to strengthen accountability in public administration. It sends a message that individuals in sensitive roles—such as procurement and supply chain positions—may face not only employment or criminal consequences, but also asset-focused civil or administrative outcomes.
At this stage, the SIU’s orders are interim measures intended to preserve potential evidence and protect potential recovery. Such actions are generally taken while investigations continue, allowing the SIU to gather further documentation, verify financial records, and develop a case strong enough for later stages of litigation. The final outcome will depend on the findings made through the investigative process and any subsequent court determinations.
Overall, this latest development is a significant escalation in the SIU’s efforts relating to Duduzile Nkosazana Nobungwana. The SIU’s successful application for a preservation order and interim interdict highlights the seriousness with which the matter is being treated, including the substantial values involved: R6.4 million for the immovable property and R1.8 million in pension benefits. The orders aim to prevent any loss of the assets’ value or disappearance from the reach of the law while the SIU continues its probe.
Source: SIU update.
Silindelo Sebata: [BREAKING] The SIU has obtained a preservation order and an interim interdict over an immovable property valued at R6.4 million and R1.8 million in pension benefits belonging to Duduzile Nkosazana Nobungwana, a former supply chain clerk at #TembisaHospital. Nobungwana resigned. #breaking
— @Sli_Masikane May 1, 2026
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
