
Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont has signed into law a bill that is drawing significant criticism from homeschooling advocates, who argue it places an undue burden on parents and infringes upon their educational freedoms. The new legislation, as described by proponents of parental rights, requires parents to prove their innocence in certain circumstances before they can homeschool their children. This measure is being characterized by some as a regressive step, potentially making Connecticut the first state in 50 years to roll back homeschool freedom.
Corey A. DeAngelis, a prominent figure in the school choice movement and an evangelist for educational freedom, has been particularly vocal in his condemnation of the bill. He stated, “BREAKING: Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed a bill requiring parents to prove their innocence before they can homeschool. Connecticut just became the first state to go backwards on homeschool freedom in the last 50 years. We must defeat these communists in court.” This strong language reflects the deep concern among homeschooling proponents that the law creates a presumption of guilt for parents seeking to educate their children at home. The assertion that parents must “prove their innocence” suggests a shift in the legal or administrative burden, potentially requiring parents to demonstrate compliance or a lack of wrongdoing rather than the state having to prove a violation.
The implications of this law are far-reaching, according to critics. They fear that it could lead to increased government oversight of homeschooling families, potentially creating bureaucratic hurdles and discouraging families from choosing this educational option. The notion of “proving innocence” implies that parents might face scrutiny or investigation without prior cause, and would then be responsible for clearing their names. This is a stark departure from the typical regulatory framework for homeschooling, which often involves notification, curriculum approval, and assessment requirements, but not a pre-emptive need to demonstrate a lack of fault.
DeAngelis’s reference to “communists” and the call to “defeat these communists in court” highlights the ideological battleground over educational control. For advocates of school choice and parental rights, this legislation represents an overreach of state power and an attempt to undermine family autonomy in educational decision-making. They view homeschooling as a fundamental right and a vital component of educational pluralism, offering an alternative to traditional schooling that can cater to diverse student needs and family values. The concern is that this new law could be a precursor to similar measures in other states, setting a dangerous precedent for parental autonomy across the nation.
The exact details of the bill and the specific circumstances under which parents would need to “prove their innocence” are crucial to fully understanding its impact. However, the framing by critics suggests that the legislation may introduce new investigative powers or reporting requirements that place an onus on parents to proactively defend their right to homeschool. This could involve demonstrating that they meet certain standards of care, educational provision, or safety, with failure to do so potentially leading to intervention. The perceived shift from a system of oversight to one of pre-emptive scrutiny is at the heart of the controversy.
Advocates for homeschooling freedom are likely to explore all available avenues to challenge this law. This could include legal action aimed at overturning the legislation on constitutional grounds, such as arguments related to parental rights, due process, or religious freedom if applicable. Political advocacy, including lobbying efforts and public awareness campaigns, will also be essential in mobilizing opposition and seeking legislative reform. The fight against what they see as an erosion of educational liberty is expected to be robust and sustained.
Source: Corey A. DeAngelis.
Corey A. DeAngelis, school choice evangelist: BREAKING: Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed a bill requiring parents to prove their innocence before they can homeschool. Connecticut just became the first state to go backwards on homeschool freedom in the last 50 years. We must defeat these communists in court.. #breaking
— @DeAngelisCorey May 1, 2026
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.









