
The core of this news story revolves around a strong statement made by Primate Elijah Ayodele, the leader of INRI Evangelical Spiritual Church, who has publicly asserted that the current administration led by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu “doesn’t have the guts to fight insecurity” in Nigeria. Primate Ayodele’s pronouncement is a direct and critical assessment of the government’s capacity and will to tackle the pervasive security challenges plaguing the nation. He goes on to pinpoint what he believes are the fundamental origins of insurgency within Nigeria, alleging that politicians are complicit in its perpetuation. According to the Primate, these politicians have allegedly been instrumental in utilizing armed groups for their own political gain, thereby fueling and sustaining the very conflicts the government is ostensibly trying to resolve. This accusation suggests a deep-seated corruption and manipulation of security apparatus for partisan advantage, implying that the problem is not merely external but is also driven by internal political machinations. Primate Ayodele’s perspective introduces a significant layer of complexity to the ongoing discourse on national security, shifting blame from external actors or solely operational failures to the political class itself. His assertion that politicians “used armed groups for” implies a deliberate and strategic exploitation of violence and instability to achieve political objectives, which could include intimidation, suppression of opposition, or the manipulation of electoral processes. The implication is that as long as these political incentives for fostering or tolerating insecurity remain, any efforts by the government to combat it will be fundamentally undermined. This argument suggests a cyclical nature to Nigeria’s security crises, where political power is intertwined with the perpetuation of violence, making a genuine resolution an arduous, if not impossible, task without addressing the root causes within the political system. The Primate’s statement is a call for introspection and accountability within the political sphere, urging a re-evaluation of the relationship between governance and security. He is not simply criticizing the government’s effectiveness but is also pointing a finger at the alleged architects and beneficiaries of insecurity within the political landscape. This perspective is crucial for understanding the multifaceted nature of Nigeria’s security challenges, which often extend beyond military or police interventions to encompass socio-political and economic factors. The Primate’s focus on the alleged use of armed groups by politicians highlights a critical issue that requires thorough investigation and potential reform. His pronouncements, while critical, serve as a stark warning about the potential for internal political dynamics to actively hinder national security efforts. The statement underscores the need for transparency, ethical leadership, and a commitment to democratic principles that do not rely on the exploitation of violence or armed factions. The ongoing insecurity in Nigeria is a multifaceted issue with deep historical and political roots, and Primate Ayodele’s commentary adds a significant perspective from a prominent religious leader, directly implicating politicians in the creation and sustenance of these problems. The challenge of insecurity, therefore, is presented not just as a failure of current governance but as a systemic issue deeply embedded within the country’s political fabric. Source: GRV Stan.
GRV Stan: Just in: Tinubu’s govt doesn’t have guts to fight insecurity – Primate Ayodele According to him, the roots of insurgency in Nigeria stem from politicians who allegedly used armed groups for.. #breaking
— @CrownprinceCom2 May 1, 2026
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.









