
Iran’s deputy secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, Ali Bagheri, has delivered a blunt message about the United States’ reliability and Iran’s demands regarding sanctions-linked money. Speaking in a pointed assessment of US-Iran relations, Bagheri said the US “cannot be trusted” and characterized Washington’s record of commitments as inherently unreliable, suggesting that breaking agreements is part of the country’s behavior.
Bagheri’s remarks were framed around the wider dispute involving US policy toward Iran and the status of Iranian funds that have been frozen. He argued that the assets at issue are “illegally frozen” and should be released, insisting that the process must occur “without any conditions or restrictions.” In Bagheri’s view, any settlement that attempts to attach prerequisites—such as compliance steps, policy concessions, or additional restrictions—would be unacceptable.
The comments underline Iran’s insistence that the dispute over funds is not merely a negotiating point but a matter of principle and legality. By describing the freezing as illegal and by calling for unconditional release, Bagheri signaled that Iran intends to resist efforts to link access to the money with unrelated diplomatic or security demands. His stance also indicates that Iran may approach future discussions from a position of rejecting conditionality.
Beyond the assets issue, Bagheri’s statement about US trustworthiness adds context to Iran’s broader posture. By claiming the US has a history of not honoring its commitments, he likely aims to justify why Iran may doubt promises or transitional arrangements offered by Washington. This characterization can be read as a warning that even if the two sides appear to move toward talks or partial understandings, Iran may still expect setbacks if the US cannot be relied upon to follow through.
The remarks also reflect the diplomatic and economic pressure that has defined the relationship between Iran and the United States for years, particularly in the context of sanctions. Iranian leaders have frequently linked sanctions and asset seizures to issues of legal rights and sovereignty, while the US has often framed its actions as tied to compliance with international norms and regional security concerns. In this case, Bagheri sought to shift the framing toward illegality and unconditional restoration of access to Iranian property.
At the same time, the reference to “ending the war on all”—as suggested by the truncated text—points to Iran’s continued emphasis on de-escalation and an end to conflict dynamics. Although the source text provided is cut off, the thrust of the message appears to be that Iran wants a termination of antagonistic actions and policies, including those that prolong or intensify confrontation.
Overall, Bagheri’s statement combines three key elements: a claim that the US is fundamentally untrustworthy in maintaining commitments, a firm demand that Iran’s frozen assets be freed without conditions, and an implied call for broader steps to end conflict or hostility. Together, these signals suggest that Iran’s approach to negotiations will likely prioritize immediate remedies for sanctions-related grievances while treating US assurances as inherently suspect.
The posture may also influence how Iranian and US negotiators interpret any possible interim measures. If Iran insists on immediate and unconditional asset release, then any plan that includes verification requirements or staged access could be rejected. Similarly, if Iran believes the US will break commitments, then even carefully structured agreements may face skepticism from the outset.
While the remarks are not presented as a detailed proposal in the provided text, they clearly communicate Iran’s red lines: no conditionality on asset release and no reliance on US promises. The comments therefore serve as both a diplomatic message to Washington and a signaling tool to Iran’s domestic audience about what Iran expects from any prospective engagement.
Source: (Source is not provided in the input).
Open Source Intel: Ali Bagheri, deputy secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council: “The U.S. cannot be trusted, breaking commitments is part of this country’s nature.” “Iran’s illegally frozen assets must be released without any conditions or restrictions.” “Ending the war on all. #breaking
— @Osint613 May 1, 2026
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.









