Foreign Holders’ US Treasuries in Fed Custody Drop to $2.68 Trillion—Lowest Level Since 2012, New Data Shows

By | May 28, 2026

A fresh data point highlighted in the Kobeissi Letter claims that foreign holdings of US Treasuries kept in Federal Reserve custody have fallen sharply. The report states that the value of US government bonds held on behalf of foreign governments, central banks, and other international institutions through accounts at the Fed has reached $2.68 trillion. It also emphasizes that this level is the lowest recorded since 2012, indicating a notable shift from earlier years.

In practical terms, this measure captures how much US debt is being held by overseas institutions in Fed custody, not necessarily the entire global amount of Treasuries outstanding that foreign actors may own. Still, it is a widely watched indicator because custody data can serve as a proxy for cross-border demand for US government securities. When these holdings decline, it can suggest that foreign institutions are reducing positions, rotating into other assets, drawing down exposure, or facing changes in portfolio decisions driven by risk, currency considerations, or yield expectations.

The headline figure—$2.68 trillion—signals that foreign official and institutional demand has eased compared with prior periods. The report frames the decline as “breaking” news and stresses the importance of the custody-based measure by tying it to a long historical comparison point: the lowest level since 2012. That framing matters because it implies that the movement is not a routine fluctuation; instead, it points to a broader trend or sustained selling/withdrawal over time.

While the snippet provided does not detail the drivers behind the reduction, the context of foreign Treasury holdings typically connects to several common market dynamics. One possibility is that changes in US interest rates and expectations for future policy can influence how attractive Treasuries remain relative to other government bonds or alternative fixed-income instruments available globally. Another factor could be currency hedging costs and foreign exchange dynamics. If foreign investors perceive less favorable conditions for hedging or currency stability, they may reduce exposure to dollar assets even if the nominal yields are competitive.

The custody decline can also reflect portfolio rebalancing by central banks and foreign governments. Central banks can adjust reserves for liquidity management, risk reduction, or macroeconomic goals, and those decisions may lead to gradual reductions in holdings of specific asset classes. Meanwhile, other international institutions—such as pension funds, sovereign wealth entities, or private asset managers—could also change allocations based on relative performance, risk constraints, and investor demand.

Market participants often watch these flows because foreign participation can affect Treasury market depth and liquidity, as well as pricing. Even though the US bond market has many buyers beyond foreign holders, shifts in overseas demand can still influence yields at the margin, especially around particular maturities where supply-demand balances matter most.

The report’s emphasis on Fed custody further indicates that the data is captured through accounts held at the Federal Reserve. In the broader financial system, the Fed custody holdings reflect a mechanism for holding and settling Treasuries for international investors. Therefore, tracking the value held in these custody accounts helps observers understand the direction of foreign engagement with US government securities.

Overall, the core message is straightforward: foreign holdings of US Treasuries sitting in Federal Reserve custody have decreased to $2.68 trillion, marking the lowest point since 2012. The Kobeissi Letter presents this as a major development, implying that the overseas investor base—at least in terms of assets held in Fed custody—has been contracting.

As always, the interpretation of custody data should consider that it measures a specific channel of holding rather than the entire universe of foreign ownership. Still, the long time comparison and the scale of the decline make the number notable for anyone tracking global demand for US debt and the evolving role of foreign official institutions in US financial markets.

Source: Kobeissi Letter

News Source

SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.

SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *