The provided text asserts that Israel has engaged in 59 years of continuous, aggressive, and greedy land theft, resulting in the control of approximately 60% less territory than it held after the Six-Day War. The author labels Israel the “worst expansionist empire ever” and suggests that the nation is “notoriously bad” at practices such as apartheid and genocide.
The core of the claim revolves around a significant reduction in Israeli-controlled territory over a nearly six-decade period, directly contradicting the notion of expansionism. The statement that Israel now controls “roughly 60% less territory than it did after the Six-Day war” is a central assertion. This implies a net loss of territorial control, which stands in stark contrast to narratives of ongoing expansion. The Six-Day War, which took place in June 1967, resulted in Israel capturing significant territories, including the West Bank, Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, and the Sinai Peninsula. If Israel has indeed lost 60% of the territory it controlled *after* this war, it implies a substantial territorial withdrawal or loss of control since that point.
The author uses strong, accusatory language, employing terms like “constant, aggressive and greedy land theft,” “worst expansionist empire ever,” “apartheid,” and “genocide.” These are serious allegations intended to characterize Israel’s actions and policies in a highly negative light. The phrase “constant, aggressive and greedy land theft” suggests a deliberate and ongoing process of acquiring land through illegitimate means.
The claim of being the “worst expansionist empire ever” is a comparative statement, placing Israel at the extreme end of historical empires in terms of its expansionist nature. However, the accompanying assertion of reduced territorial control complicates this label, suggesting a potential contradiction or a nuanced interpretation by the author. It’s possible the author views past territorial gains as indicative of expansionism, even if current control has diminished, or that the *methods* used are considered expansionist regardless of the ultimate territorial outcome.
The accusations of “apartheid” and “genocide” are severe and highly contentious. These terms carry significant historical and legal weight and are often used in critiques of Israeli policies, particularly concerning Palestinians. The statement that Israel is “notoriously bad” at these practices implies a widespread reputation or a consistent pattern of behavior that aligns with these descriptions.
The text, as presented, offers a highly critical perspective on Israel’s actions and historical trajectory concerning land and territorial control. It challenges conventional understandings of Israeli expansionism by positing a significant reduction in controlled territory since the Six-Day War, while simultaneously condemning its alleged practices. The author’s strong denunciations and use of loaded terminology indicate a deeply critical stance, framing Israel’s history through the lens of continuous aggression and unethical conduct.
The information is attributed to David Collier. The statement is a direct expression of his views and accusations regarding Israel’s territorial policies and alleged human rights violations.
David Collier: Breaking news: After 59 years of constant, aggressive and greedy land theft, Israel now controls roughly 60% less territory than it did after the Six-Day war. Worst expansionist empire ever. It can be added to apartheid and genocide as things Israel is notoriously bad at.. #breaking
— @mishtal May 1, 2026
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
