Hezbollah has accused Israel of pursuing long-term ambitions for Lebanon after publishing a map that, the movement said, incorporates South Lebanon as part of Israel’s strategic calculus. In a statement highlighted by the Palestine Chronicle, Hezbollah said the map amounted to an “undeniable confirmation” of what it described as Israeli aims regarding Lebanon’s “land, its resources, and its capabilities.” The movement warned that those aims “have not been abandoned and will never be abandoned,” framing the cartographic move as consistent with ongoing pressures on southern territory.
The warning comes amid what rights and environmental observers describe as a sustained pattern of environmental harm in southern Lebanon since hostilities escalated in October 2023. According to the Palestine Chronicle report, Israeli forces have repeatedly used white phosphorus and other toxic substances in the south, damaging forests, agricultural areas, and surrounding ecosystems. Hezbollah and independent experts have argued that the scale and nature of the destruction could amount to ecocide, with consequences expected to extend beyond immediate battlefield damage and into the livelihoods of local communities.
Hezbollah’s critique also links environmental devastation to the political track of direct negotiations between Israel and Lebanese authorities. The movement contended that the publication of the map clarifies the purpose behind Israel’s participation in talks, asserting that Israel is simultaneously destroying Lebanese territory and seeking to establish new realities on the ground while negotiations continue. In Hezbollah’s view, that dual-track approach undermines the credibility of any diplomatic process that fails to halt attacks on the land and its natural resources.
Beyond Hezbollah’s statements, reporting by humanitarian and media organizations points to a recurring incendiary campaign targeting woodlands near the frontline. The Guardian quoted Lebanese civil defense chief Hussein Fakih describing how incendiary attacks occur nearly every day following the June 17 ceasefire, including the use of drones to drop incendiary materials, white phosphorus shells into woodlands, and illumination flares designed to ignite vegetation during daylight hours. The Guardian report estimated that fires have affected roughly 30% to 40% of land in areas near the frontline, while conservationist Hisham Younes characterized the pattern as ecocide and said the destruction is rendering parts of the region uninhabitable. The account was echoed in coverage summarized by The Guardian.
In those descriptions, firefighters operate under restrictive coordination requirements. The Guardian reported that firefighting units must coordinate movements with the Lebanese army, which relays requests to a deconfliction arrangement that includes the Israeli military. Firefighters, according to the outlet, were granted permission to fight fires only at two specific locations and not in other areas where fires were ongoing. Environmental groups cited in the report argued that the fires are not isolated incidents but part of a broader strategy affecting Lebanon’s woodlands and the biodiversity those ecosystems support.
Other reporting also described the continuing use of incendiaries and white phosphorus in connection with the wildfire campaign. In an update on the dispute, the Times of Israel reported that Lebanon’s prime minister said Israel was breaching international law, while Defense Minister Israel Katz drew attention to aggressive housing-destruction rhetoric. That reporting also reiterated the mechanism described by Lebanese authorities and firefighters: drones dropping incendiary material, white phosphorus shells directed at woodlands, and daytime illumination flares intended to make vegetation catch fire. The account further noted that the Israel Defense Forces said its actions were conducted with precautions aimed at mitigating harm to civilians and the environment. The Times of Israel report cited the IDF’s position while describing Lebanon’s counter-claims.
Hezbollah’s latest warning therefore unfolds against a backdrop of contested narratives over intent, lawfulness, and the meaning of “security” operations. The movement’s core claim is that environmental destruction is not merely collateral but integral to a broader territorial agenda. By linking the map’s inclusion of South Lebanon to ongoing fires and toxic attacks, Hezbollah is portraying the battlefield and the negotiation table as serving the same objective: transforming the geography and resources of the south in ways that outlast any ceasefire period.
In the statement, Hezbollah called on the Lebanese government, the Environment Ministry, and other relevant state institutions to intervene to protect southern land and natural resources, and to pursue accountability for the damage. That demand reflects a broader push by critics to move from emergency response to long-term measures—environmental assessments, legal scrutiny, and restoration plans—especially as communities face damaged soil, disrupted agriculture, and degraded ecosystems.
For now, the controversy is likely to intensify pressure on diplomatic channels while shaping public perceptions of the ceasefire’s durability. If Hezbollah’s interpretation—that Israel is establishing irreversible facts through environmental harm—gains traction with local authorities and international observers, it could complicate efforts to sustain negotiations. Hezbollah’s message suggests that even where talks proceed, southern Lebanon’s forests and ecosystems remain at the center of the conflict, with far-reaching consequences for the ability of residents to return and remain on their land.
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
