General Milley’s Treason: Stopping Trump’s Attack on China

General Milley called China’s military behind President Trump’s back and told them he would stop Trump’s order to attack China in the last days of his 1st term

That’s not only a form of military coup, it’s treason

That’s why he got pardoned by Biden

They were working together

In a controversial tweet, social media commentator DC_Draino raises serious allegations against General Mark Milley, the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, suggesting that he engaged in actions that could be interpreted as treasonous. The claim centers around an allegation that Milley communicated with Chinese military officials during the final days of President Donald Trump’s first term, assuring them that he would intervene to prevent any military orders from Trump that could lead to an attack on China.

### Allegations of Treason and Military Coup

According to the tweet, Milley’s alleged actions constitute a form of military coup, as he reportedly acted independently of the President to undermine his authority. This assertion has sparked a heated debate about the limits of military authority and the responsibilities of military leaders to civilian control. The accusation that Milley communicated with China without Trump’s knowledge raises questions about loyalty and the constitutional framework governing military conduct in the United States.

### The Context of Milley’s Actions

The backdrop of these allegations lies in the tense geopolitical climate between the United States and China, particularly during Trump’s presidency. The tweet suggests that Milley’s conversations with China were not just precautionary but rather indicative of a deeper conspiracy. Critics argue that if true, such actions could have severe implications for national security and civilian oversight of the military. The notion that a military leader would take it upon themselves to counteract the directives of a sitting president raises alarms about the balance of power within the U.S. government.

### Biden’s Pardon and Implications

Furthermore, DC_Draino insinuates that these actions led to Milley receiving a pardon from President Joe Biden, implying a collusion between the two. This assertion intensifies the controversy, suggesting that the current administration may have condoned or even supported Milley’s alleged misconduct. The implications of such a pardon extend beyond Milley, raising concerns about the accountability of military leaders and the potential erosion of democratic norms.

### Public Reaction and Political Ramifications

The tweet has generated considerable public interest and debate, especially among political commentators and analysts. Supporters of Trump view these allegations as a serious breach of trust and an affront to the democratic process, while others argue that Milley acted out of a sense of duty to prevent potential military conflict. This divide underscores the polarized political landscape in the U.S., where actions taken by military leaders are scrutinized through the lens of partisan politics.

### Conclusion

In summary, the allegations surrounding General Milley’s conduct during the final days of the Trump administration raise critical questions about military authority, accountability, and the relationship between civilian leadership and military command. The claims made in the tweet highlight the ongoing tensions in American politics and the complexities involved in ensuring national security while upholding democratic principles. As the debate continues, it remains essential for citizens to engage with these issues critically, understanding their implications for the future of U.S. governance and military oversight.

General Milley called China’s military behind President Trump’s back and told them he would stop Trump’s order to attack China in the last days of his 1st term

That’s not only a form of military coup, it’s treason

That’s why he got pardoned by Biden

They were working together https://t.co/UklWwg0hkx

— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) January 20, 2025

General Milley called China’s military behind President Trump’s back and told them he would stop Trump’s order to attack China in the last days of his 1st term

Have you ever heard a story that sounds so unbelievable, you just can’t wrap your head around it? Well, the recent allegations surrounding General Mark Milley and former President Donald Trump might just fit that bill. According to reports, General Milley allegedly reached out to China’s military during the chaotic final days of Trump’s presidency. This was said to be in an effort to assure them that he would thwart any possible military strikes ordered by Trump against China. If true, this situation raises some serious questions about military loyalty, authority, and national security.

Imagine being in a position where the top military official in the United States is reportedly undermining the orders of the sitting president. It’s not just a little bit of back-channel communications; this is a major breach of trust and could potentially be seen as a form of a military coup. The idea that General Milley was in contact with a foreign military, essentially telling them not to worry about possible attacks from the U.S., makes you wonder about the implications for democracy and the chain of command.

That’s not only a form of military coup, it’s treason

Now, let’s unpack what this really means. If these allegations are accurate, many would argue that General Milley’s actions are not just questionable but could be classified as treasonous. Treason is a word that gets thrown around a lot, but its meaning is quite serious—it involves betraying one’s country, and in this case, it would mean undermining the orders of a sitting commander-in-chief to prevent any military action against another nation.

This situation could open the floodgates for discussions around accountability and the role of military leaders in the political sphere. A military coup, by definition, involves the military taking control of the government, often through illegal means. If Milley did indeed communicate with China to prevent a military strike, it raises the question: who is really in charge? This isn’t just about one general’s judgment; it’s about the integrity of the entire military establishment and its relationship with elected officials.

That’s why he got pardoned by Biden

In a twist that has many scratching their heads, it has been suggested that General Milley received a pardon from President Biden after these events came to light. This has fueled speculation and conspiracy theories, suggesting that the two may have been working together. Some argue that this was a means of protecting Milley from potential legal repercussions for his alleged actions. However, there hasn’t been any concrete evidence to support the claim that Biden and Milley were in cahoots.

The very idea of a pardon adds another layer to this already complicated narrative. Pardons are typically reserved for those who have committed crimes, and if Milley’s actions are viewed through that lens, it raises questions about accountability for high-ranking officials. Are we setting a precedent where military leaders can operate independently of the president without facing consequences?

They were working together

This leads us to the notion that Milley and Biden were somehow collaborating during this tumultuous time. While this theory remains speculative, it speaks to the broader discourse about trust in government and military institutions. When the public hears that a general is perhaps working behind the scenes with political leaders, it can create a significant rift between the military and civilian populations.

It’s important for citizens to understand the implications of such actions on democracy and governance. The military is designed to be an apolitical entity, serving the interests of the nation as directed by its elected leaders. If that balance is tipped, we might find ourselves in a situation where the military operates independently, leading to a potential erosion of democratic principles.

With all of this swirling around, the conversation about military authority, respect for the chain of command, and the responsibilities of elected officials is more relevant than ever. How can we ensure that our military remains loyal to the Constitution and our democratic processes? How do we hold leaders accountable without undermining the very systems that protect our freedoms?

In the end, this situation serves as a wake-up call for all of us. It’s a reminder to stay informed, question narratives, and engage in discussions about the integrity of our government. Whether you lean left or right, these are issues that affect everyone, and understanding them is crucial for the health of our democracy.

“`