Shocking JFK Files Reveal CIA’s Atomic Tech Talks with Israel

 

—————–

Understanding the JFK Files and their Unreported Revelations

The declassification of the JFK Files has sparked renewed interest in the events surrounding President John F. Kennedy’s assassination and the implications of governmental secrecy. Among the numerous documents released, one admission stands out as particularly shocking: the acknowledgment of discussions regarding atomic technology transfer from the CIA to Israel. This revelation, mentioned by CIA officer James Angleton, raises significant questions about international relations and nuclear proliferation during the 1960s.

The Context of the JFK Files

The JFK Files comprise thousands of documents related to the assassination of President Kennedy on November 22, 1963. These files include memos, reports, and correspondence that provide insight into the political climate of the era, the investigations that followed Kennedy’s death, and the various theories surrounding the assassination. Despite the extensive nature of these files, many significant admissions remain underreported by mainstream media.

Angleton’s Admission: A Critical Piece of Evidence

In a recent tweet by the user MJTruthUltra, a crucial exchange from the declassified files was highlighted, showcasing a meeting where Mr. Angleton confirmed that discussions about the transfer of atomic technology to Israel took place. The straightforward response from Angleton, "Yes," to the question posed about whether this topic was raised, opens the door to a host of implications regarding U.S. foreign policy and the strategic decisions made during Kennedy’s presidency.

Implications of Atomic Technology Transfer

The acknowledgment of such a transfer is alarming for several reasons. It suggests that the U.S. government, particularly the CIA, was willing to engage in controversial practices that could have far-reaching consequences for global security. The implications of nuclear technology transfer to a nation like Israel, which has been a focal point in Middle Eastern geopolitics, could have had lasting effects on regional stability and U.S. alliances.

The Silence of Major News Agencies

One of the most perplexing aspects of this revelation is the apparent lack of coverage by reputable news agencies. The failure to report on such a significant admission raises concerns about media accountability and the potential filtering of information that the public has a right to know. In an age where information can spread rapidly through social media, the silence of traditional news outlets on critical issues such as these highlights a troubling trend of selective reporting.

The Need for Transparency

The declassification of the JFK Files emphasizes the need for transparency in government dealings, especially concerning national security and international relations. As citizens, understanding our history and the decisions made by those in power is crucial for fostering a more informed electorate. The implications of discussions related to atomic technology and its transfer to other nations must be thoroughly examined and discussed to ensure that lessons are learned from the past.

Conclusion

The revelations from the JFK Files, particularly the admission by James Angleton regarding CIA discussions on atomic technology transfer to Israel, underscore the importance of transparency and accountability in government. As more documents are declassified, it is essential for both the media and the public to engage critically with these findings to understand their implications fully. The silence from major news agencies on such an important topic reflects broader issues in media coverage that warrant attention and discussion.

When the JFK Files were declassified, I found one of the most stunning admissions to date. Not one reputable news agency reported on it. Why?

Mr Angleton, “at that meeting did he raise with you the subject of Atomic technology from the CIA to Israel?”

Angleton: “Yes”

These… pic.twitter.com/DBsatg9wfk

— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) April 2, 2025

When the JFK Files were declassified, I found one of the most stunning admissions to date. Not one reputable news agency reported on it. Why?

The declassification of the JFK Files has opened up a treasure trove of information that many people are still trying to wrap their heads around. Among these revelations, one admission stands out as particularly shocking and has gone largely unreported by mainstream media. This begs the question: why has this crucial piece of history been swept under the rug?

In the documents, a conversation was revealed involving James Angleton, the former head of CIA counterintelligence. During a meeting, he was asked, “at that meeting did he raise with you the subject of Atomic technology from the CIA to Israel?” Angleton’s response was simply, “Yes.” This short exchange is not just a footnote in history; it raises significant questions about the relationship between the CIA and Israel during a pivotal time.

Mr Angleton, “at that meeting did he raise with you the subject of Atomic technology from the CIA to Israel?”

The context of Angleton’s admission is critical. The CIA’s involvement in the proliferation of atomic technology has been a topic of debate and speculation for decades. The fact that this conversation was documented in the JFK Files suggests that there was a conscious effort to engage in nuclear cooperation with Israel, which could have massive implications for both U.S. foreign policy and global security.

In a world where nuclear capabilities are a hot-button issue, the idea that a government agency was potentially facilitating atomic technology transfer is alarming. It raises questions about oversight, ethical boundaries, and the long-term ramifications of such actions. With the current geopolitical climate, understanding these historical dealings is more important than ever, as it sheds light on the complexities of U.S.-Israel relations.

Angleton: “Yes”

Angleton’s affirmation is monumental. It signifies that there was acknowledgment at the highest levels of government regarding the exchange of sensitive technology. This is not merely an academic interest; it has real-world implications that affect international relations today. Why hasn’t this information gained more traction in reputable news outlets?

One might speculate that the lack of coverage could be attributed to the controversial nature of the topic. The implications of U.S. involvement in nuclear technology transfer could create political turmoil, not just for Israel but also for the U.S. itself. The media landscape often shies away from topics that could spark outrage or complicate diplomatic relations.

These revelations speak to a larger narrative.

What makes this admission even more significant is that it fits into a larger narrative about trust and transparency between governments and their citizens. The JFK Files were supposed to bring clarity to one of the most scrutinized periods in American history. Instead, they have uncovered layers of complexity that remain largely unexplored.

Public interest in these files is high, but the lack of detailed reporting on key revelations leaves many people in the dark. It feels like a missed opportunity for journalists to dig deeper into these issues and inform the public about what is at stake.

Moreover, the absence of coverage raises ethical questions about journalistic integrity. Are media outlets prioritizing sensational news over the critical analysis of historical documentation? In an age where misinformation can spread like wildfire, it is crucial for reputable news agencies to take the lead in uncovering the truth.

Why the silence from reputable news agencies?

The question remains, why have reputable news agencies chosen to remain silent about such a significant revelation? Is it a fear of backlash, or perhaps a desire to maintain the status quo? The implications of Angleton’s admission extend beyond just historical interest; they resonate in current discussions about nuclear proliferation and international diplomacy.

As citizens, we have a right to know the full story behind our government’s actions, especially when it comes to matters of national security and international agreements. The lack of transparency can erode trust, leading to a more skeptical public. If the media fails to act as a watchdog, who will hold power accountable?

Engaging with history: What can we learn?

Understanding the context and content of the JFK Files helps us engage with history in a meaningful way. It reminds us that our past is not merely a series of events but a complex tapestry of decisions and actions that shape our present and future.

By engaging with these revelations, we can foster a more informed public discourse. We can ask critical questions and seek answers that will guide future policies. After all, knowing what happened in the past can help us make better decisions moving forward.

In summary, the admission regarding atomic technology from the CIA to Israel is a pivotal moment in the declassified JFK Files. It raises essential questions about transparency, accountability, and the intricate web of international relations. As we continue to unpack these revelations, it is crucial for reputable news sources to step up and provide the coverage that these findings deserve.

Ultimately, history is not just about the past; it’s about how we understand our present and shape our future. By bringing these discussions into the light, we can work towards a more informed and engaged society.