Using Her Baby as a Prop: A Performative News Moment

Literally using her baby as a prop. She obviously doesn’t need to hold the child for a 5 minute cable news hit. This is all performative.

In a recent tweet, commentator Matt Walsh criticized a public figure for allegedly using her baby as a prop during a cable news segment. This tweet has sparked a wide discussion on social media regarding the ethics of using children in media appearances, particularly in a politically charged environment. Walsh’s assertion that the individual in question did not need to hold her child for a brief five-minute segment raises questions about authenticity and the motivations of public figures, especially in the context of performative actions.

### The Context of Media and Parenthood

In today’s media landscape, the portrayal of parenthood often walks a fine line between personal expression and public performance. Many public figures use their children to humanize themselves or to garner sympathy from viewers. However, Walsh argues that this practice can sometimes feel disingenuous or contrived. The use of children as emotional props can lead to skepticism among audiences, who may wonder if the parent is prioritizing their image over the well-being of the child.

### The Impact of Performative Actions

Performative actions, particularly in the realm of politics and media, have garnered increasing scrutiny. Critics argue that when public figures engage in such behavior, they risk trivializing important issues and overshadowing the genuine experiences of others. Walsh’s tweet highlights this concern by suggesting that the individual’s actions were more about performance than authenticity. This raises a broader question about the role of media in shaping public perception and the lengths to which individuals will go to maintain their public personas.

### Audience Reactions

The reactions to Walsh’s tweet have been varied, with some agreeing with his perspective, while others defend the practice of including children in media appearances. Supporters of Walsh argue that the use of children in such contexts can exploit their innocence for political gain, while opponents believe that including family members in media interactions can foster a sense of relatability and connection with the audience. This debate underscores a significant tension in contemporary media discourse, as public figures navigate the complexities of personal and professional life.

### Social Media and Public Discourse

The role of social media in amplifying these conversations cannot be underestimated. Platforms like Twitter serve as a battleground for public opinion, allowing individuals to voice their thoughts and engage in discussions about pressing societal issues. Walsh’s tweet is a prime example of how a single statement can resonate widely, prompting discussions that extend beyond the initial topic. It reflects the power of social media to shape narratives and influence public sentiment.

### Conclusion

Matt Walsh’s tweet about the performative use of children in media highlights critical issues surrounding authenticity, ethics, and the role of personal narratives in public discourse. As society continues to grapple with these topics, it is essential for public figures to consider the implications of their actions, especially when it involves vulnerable individuals like children. The ongoing debate may serve as a reminder for media consumers to remain discerning about the motivations behind public appearances and the narratives being constructed around them. In an age where social media amplifies both voices and images, the line between genuine representation and performative display becomes increasingly important to navigate.

Literally using her baby as a prop. She obviously doesn’t need to hold the child for a 5 minute cable news hit. This is all performative. https://t.co/D5UMgOb1ZY

— Matt Walsh (@MattWalshBlog) April 2, 2025

Literally using her baby as a prop

In today’s world of social media, public figures are often scrutinized for their actions, especially when it comes to their roles as parents. A recent tweet from Matt Walsh sparked a conversation that resonates with many people. He stated, “Literally using her baby as a prop. She obviously doesn’t need to hold the child for a 5 minute cable news hit. This is all performative.” This tweet, shared widely, raises a pertinent question: Are some parents using their children for attention?

When we talk about using a baby as a prop, it’s important to consider the context. In this instance, it seems Walsh is critiquing a specific situation where a mother appears to be leveraging her child for personal or political gain during a media appearance. This notion of performative parenting is not new. It’s been a topic of debate across various platforms, especially in the age of social media where appearances matter more than ever.

She obviously doesn’t need to hold the child for a 5 minute cable news hit

The phrase “She obviously doesn’t need to hold the child for a 5 minute cable news hit” speaks volumes. It highlights the idea that some parents might be more concerned about how they are perceived on camera than about the needs of their child. The reality is that parenting can be challenging, and many parents feel pressured to portray a particular image to the world. The expectation to be the ‘perfect parent’ often leads to situations where parents may feel they need to showcase their children in a certain light, even if it means using them as props in public appearances.

In the fast-paced world of cable news, where segments are short and attention spans even shorter, the question arises: Is it necessary to bring a child into the spotlight for such brief interactions? Critics argue that this can be detrimental to both the parent and the child, as it shifts the focus from genuine parenting to a performative display aimed at garnering sympathy or support.

This is all performative

The assertion that “this is all performative” indicates a growing awareness about the performative aspects of modern parenting. It’s not just about being a good parent; it’s also about how parenting is perceived by others. Many individuals now curate their lives on social media, showcasing their parenting moments to gain likes, shares, and validation. This raises ethical questions about the impact on children who are unwitting participants in their parents’ performances.

Parents have always wanted to share their experiences, but the emergence of social media has amplified this desire. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok encourage parents to document their lives, but when does sharing become performative? The line is often blurred, especially when it involves children who cannot consent to being in the spotlight.

The implications of this trend go beyond individual cases. It can shape societal expectations of parenting, leading to pressure on new parents to meet certain standards. The fear of judgment from others can result in decisions that prioritize appearances over authenticity.

The Impact of Social Media on Parenting

Social media has transformed the way we communicate and connect with one another. For parents, it offers a platform to share advice, experiences, and milestones. However, it also creates an environment where comparison is rampant. Parents might find themselves feeling inadequate when they see others showcasing their ‘perfect’ family moments. This can lead to a cycle of performative parenting, where the focus shifts from genuine connection to seeking external validation.

Moreover, the tweets and discussions surrounding performative parenting reveal a deep-seated concern for the well-being of children. Critics argue that using children as props can lead to emotional and psychological impacts. Children may grow up feeling like their worth is tied to their ability to perform for an audience, rather than being valued for who they are as individuals.

Shifting Perspectives on Parenting

Amid the discussions about performative parenting, it’s essential to recognize the shifting perspectives on what it means to be a parent today. The traditional notions of parenting are evolving, with many embracing a more relaxed and authentic approach. This shift encourages parents to focus on building genuine relationships with their children rather than adhering to societal expectations.

For many, the goal is to cultivate an environment where children feel safe, loved, and valued without the pressure of public scrutiny. Engaging in meaningful conversations about parenting can help dismantle the performative aspects that have become so prominent in today’s culture.

In conclusion, the tweet by Matt Walsh has opened a Pandora’s box of discussions about the nature of parenting in a public world. The focus on using children as props raises important questions about authenticity, the impact of social media, and the responsibilities of parents to protect their children. As we navigate this complex landscape, it’s crucial to prioritize genuine connections and the well-being of our children over performative actions for the sake of appearance. Let’s strive for a future where parenting is celebrated for its authenticity rather than its performance.