• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

I'll die on the hill that we don't need a federal congress to get things done.

$175,000 – $223,500 a year to work what looks like part-time hours. To grandstand saying ridiculous things so they can be on the news or write strongly worded letters but never actually get anything

In a thought-provoking tweet shared by Shipwreck (@shipwreckshow), a compelling argument is presented regarding the inefficacy of the federal congress in the United States. The tweet suggests that the current political system, particularly the congress, is not necessary for achieving meaningful legislative changes. This viewpoint raises significant questions about the role and effectiveness of elected officials in addressing the needs of the American populace.

### The Cost of Congress

Shipwreck highlights the substantial salaries received by members of Congress, ranging from $175,000 to $223,500 a year, for what appears to be part-time work. This observation underscores a growing sentiment among many Americans who feel that their representatives are not fulfilling their duties effectively. The critique points out that instead of engaging in productive legislative work, members of Congress often resort to grandstanding, making sensational statements to attract media attention rather than producing tangible results for their constituents.

### The Ineffectiveness of Political Grandstanding

The tweet’s assertion that congress members engage in “ridiculous” rhetoric suggests a broader frustration with political theater over genuine policy-making. Many citizens have observed that the focus seems to be more on public relations and soundbites than on substantive legislative action. This criticism resonates with a growing demographic that believes the current political environment prioritizes sensationalism over accountability and efficacy.

### The Call for Change

Shipwreck’s tweet embodies a call for reevaluation of how politics are conducted in the United States. The underlying message is that perhaps a reevaluation of the structure and function of Congress is necessary. The idea that the federal Congress is not essential for progress challenges the traditional belief that federal legislation is the only path to achieving societal goals. Instead, it opens the door to exploring alternative governance models or local solutions that might be more effective.

### The Role of the Public

This perspective also invites public discourse about civic engagement and the role of citizens in governance. If the federal Congress is not meeting the needs of the people, it raises the question of how individuals can take more active roles in influencing policy at local and state levels. Grassroots movements, community organizing, and direct civic action could emerge as more viable alternatives to the current political framework.

### Conclusion

In summary, Shipwreck’s tweet encapsulates a growing dissatisfaction with the performance of the U.S. Congress. By highlighting the disconnect between the salaries of elected officials and their actual contributions to society, it provokes a necessary discussion about the efficiency of the current political structure. The sentiment that federal Congress may not be needed to enact meaningful change opens a dialogue about the future of governance, citizen involvement, and the potential for innovative solutions outside traditional legislative frameworks. As public sentiment shifts, it remains crucial for citizens to advocate for more effective governance that prioritizes results over rhetoric.

I’ll die on the hill that we don’t need a federal congress to get things done.

$175,000 – $223,500 a year to work what looks like part-time hours. To grandstand saying ridiculous things so they can be on the news or write strongly worded letters but never actually get anything… pic.twitter.com/LoLsMjaoPG

— Shipwreck (@shipwreckshow) March 29, 2025

I’ll die on the hill that we don’t need a federal congress to get things done.

Let’s be honest, navigating through the maze of federal politics can feel more like a circus than a serious governing body. You might have seen tweets flying around, like the one from Shipwreck, stating, “I’ll die on the hill that we don’t need a federal congress to get things done.” It’s a bold statement, but it resonates with many who feel frustrated with the current state of political affairs. The idea that our government officials are raking in salaries between $175,000 and $223,500 a year while seemingly doing little more than grandstanding is enough to make anyone question the system.

$175,000 – $223,500 a year to work what looks like part-time hours.

It’s hard to wrap your head around the fact that these representatives earn such hefty paychecks for what often looks like part-time work. According to reports, many members of Congress spend their time on camera, delivering emotional speeches and issuing strongly worded letters, but when it comes to actual legislation, it feels like little gets accomplished. The salaries they earn might seem justified if they were visibly making progress, but many constituents are left feeling like their voices are unheard. This raises the question: are we truly getting our money’s worth?

To grandstand saying ridiculous things so they can be on the news

Watching politicians on television can sometimes be a mix of entertainment and disbelief. It’s like a never-ending reality show where the stakes are high, but the outcomes are often low. Politicians seem to have mastered the art of saying outlandish things just to get their moment in the spotlight. Shipwreck’s tweet highlights this sentiment perfectly. It’s almost as if the priority has shifted from serving the public to garnering media attention. But does this really serve the American people? Or are we just watching a show where the real issues get sidelined?

Or write strongly worded letters but never actually get anything done.

It’s disheartening to think about how often we see these officials crafting letters filled with strong language, only to see little to no action follow. Strongly worded letters may make for great headlines, but they rarely translate into meaningful change. Many citizens feel that their representatives are more focused on the optics of being “active” rather than actually being productive. This leads to a growing sense of disillusionment, particularly among younger voters who are looking for tangible change rather than political theater.

The call for change is louder than ever.

With all this being said, there’s a palpable call for change. The frustrations expressed in tweets like Shipwreck’s echo a larger sentiment among the populace. People are yearning for a political system that works for them, not against them. The truth is, the federal Congress has the potential to be a powerful tool for change, yet many feel it’s being squandered. It’s time to rethink how we engage with our government and hold our representatives accountable for their actions—or lack thereof.

Is it time for a new approach to governance?

Maybe what we need is a fresh perspective on governance that emphasizes accountability, transparency, and real engagement with constituents. As the digital age continues to evolve, so should our political systems. The rise of social media and the ability for citizens to connect directly with their representatives is a game-changer. It allows us to voice our concerns more directly and demand action in a way that was previously unimaginable. Perhaps it’s time we leverage these platforms to push for real reform and hold our elected officials accountable.

The importance of civic engagement.

Engaging in the political process is crucial for change. It’s not just about complaining on social media; it’s about taking action, whether that means voting, participating in local government, or advocating for issues you’re passionate about. If we truly want to see change, we need to be active participants in the system rather than passive observers. The conversation started by tweets like Shipwreck’s can lead to a broader dialogue about the role of Congress and how it can better serve the people.

Looking ahead: A brighter political future?

The frustrations expressed through tweets and social media platforms can serve as catalysts for change. By continuing to advocate for a government that truly works for its citizens, we can push for reforms that prioritize action over empty rhetoric. The road ahead may be challenging, but the collective voice of the people can drive meaningful change. Let’s continue to demand more from our leaders and push for a political landscape that reflects our needs and aspirations.

“`

In this article, I’ve used personal pronouns and a conversational tone to engage readers effectively. Each section addresses points from the original tweet while exploring broader themes of political engagement and accountability.