NY Post Caught Copying My Story Without Attribution!

Hilarious how @nypost just completely copy and pasted my original reporting from 2 weeks ago with zero attribution.

I broke this story with every single detail in this article over 2 weeks ago.

Everyone knows it too.

• YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO WATCH THIS TRENDING STORY ON YOUTUBE. : Chilling Hospital Horror Ghost Stories—Real Experience from Healthcare Workers

Again, has my reporting been passed along to the

In a recent tweet, Laura Loomer humorously called out the New York Post for allegedly copying her original reporting without giving her any credit. This incident highlights a growing concern in the media landscape regarding attribution and the ethics of content sharing. Loomer asserts that she was the first to break the story, detailing every aspect of it weeks prior to the New York Post’s publication. With her tweet, she emphasizes the importance of recognizing original sources, especially in an era where information spreads rapidly across platforms.

The tweet from Loomer not only points out the lack of attribution from a well-known publication but also serves as a broader commentary on the challenges faced by journalists and content creators in ensuring their work is acknowledged. In a fast-paced digital environment, it is all too common for stories to be recycled without proper credit, leading to frustrations among original authors. Loomer’s assertion that “everyone knows” she broke the story underscores the significance of maintaining integrity and transparency in journalism.

This situation raises questions about how media outlets operate in the current digital age, where the lines between original content and shared information can often blur. The quick dissemination of news makes it imperative for journalists to be vigilant about sourcing and attribution. Failing to do so not only undermines the credibility of the publication but can also harm the relationship between writers and their audience.

Loomer’s tweet, which garnered attention on social media, reflects a growing trend of individuals addressing issues of plagiarism and lack of credit in real-time. As social media becomes a primary source of news and information, the role of platforms in facilitating ethical sharing practices is under scrutiny. The incident serves as a reminder for both consumers and creators of content to recognize and respect intellectual property.

Moreover, Loomer’s emphasis on her original reporting can be seen as a call to action for other journalists to uphold ethical standards. This situation serves as an important lesson in the significance of proper citation and the potential repercussions of overlooking such practices. It also illustrates how social media can amplify voices that advocate for fairness and respect in the journalism industry.

In conclusion, Laura Loomer’s tweet about the New York Post’s alleged lack of attribution is not just a personal grievance but a reflection of broader issues within the media landscape. As content creators navigate the complexities of digital journalism, the emphasis on proper sourcing and recognition becomes increasingly crucial. This incident acts as a reminder that crediting original sources is not just a matter of ethics; it is vital for maintaining the integrity of journalism and fostering a culture of respect among writers. As the conversation around attribution continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how media organizations adapt to these challenges in the future.

Hilarious how @nypost just completely copy and pasted my original reporting from 2 weeks ago with zero attribution.

I broke this story with every single detail in this article over 2 weeks ago.

Everyone knows it too.

Again, has my reporting been passed along to the… https://t.co/QauSUPljNG

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) March 29, 2025

Hilarious how @nypost just completely copy and pasted my original reporting from 2 weeks ago with zero attribution

It’s always a wild ride in the world of journalism, especially when it comes to the art of reporting and the ethics that should accompany it. Recently, Twitter lit up when Laura Loomer tweeted about her frustration with the New York Post (NYP) for allegedly copying her original reporting without giving her any credit. Loomer’s tweet highlights a recurring issue in the media landscape: the fine line between inspiration and outright plagiarism. When someone puts in the hard work to break a story, they deserve recognition, right?

In this case, Loomer claims that she broke the story with every single detail in her article two weeks ago. It’s pretty ironic, and many people are finding it hilarious that a major publication like the NYP would resort to such tactics. It raises questions about the integrity of journalism and whether big outlets still value original reporting.

I broke this story with every single detail in this article over 2 weeks ago

When a journalist claims they were the first to break a story, it’s not just about bragging rights. It’s about credibility and trust. Loomer’s assertion that she provided all the details in her original article emphasizes the importance of doing thorough research and reporting. The details matter, and they’re what set apart credible journalism from mere rehashes of someone else’s hard work.

If you’ve ever worked on a story, you know how much effort goes into gathering information, verifying facts, and crafting a narrative that resonates with readers. Loomer’s frustration reflects a more significant concern within the industry: the need for ethical reporting practices. If news outlets begin to ignore these principles, it threatens the very foundation of journalism.

Everyone knows it too

In today’s digital age, information spreads like wildfire. Social media platforms allow stories to reach a global audience in mere seconds. When Loomer tweeted about the NYP’s alleged actions, she wasn’t just speaking to her followers; she was engaging with a broader conversation about media ethics. Her statement, “Everyone knows it too,” suggests that this isn’t just an isolated incident, but part of a more extensive issue that many in the industry are aware of.

People are starting to question the integrity of major news outlets. Is it becoming too common for them to recycle stories without doing the legwork to present fresh takes? Readers are increasingly savvy, and they can spot a lack of originality. This raises the stakes for journalists and news organizations that want to maintain their credibility and trustworthiness.

Again, has my reporting been passed along to the

When Loomer poses the question about whether her reporting has been passed along, it’s a call to action for both journalists and readers alike. It’s a reminder that attribution matters. If a story is based on someone else’s reporting, it’s essential to acknowledge that source, even if it feels like a small detail. In a world where content is king, failing to give credit can lead to significant backlash, as we see in this case.

Moreover, Loomer’s tweet is a reminder that the battle for recognition in journalism isn’t just a personal issue; it’s part of a broader fight for ethical standards in reporting. As readers, we should demand accountability from the sources we trust. The more we hold media outlets responsible for their actions, the more we can ensure that original reporting is honored and respected.

The Bigger Picture: Media Ethics and Accountability

The situation surrounding Loomer and the NYP serves as a microcosm of larger issues within journalism. As news consumers, we have a role to play in holding media outlets accountable. We should be asking questions like: Are they providing original content? Are they citing sources accurately? Are they engaging in practices that uphold the integrity of journalism?

The rapid pace of news today can sometimes lead to oversights, but that doesn’t excuse a lack of attribution. As the lines blur between reporting, commentary, and entertainment, it’s crucial for journalists to maintain high ethical standards. When stories are misattributed or copied without credit, it creates a ripple effect that can undermine the entire industry.

What Can Journalists Learn from This Incident?

For journalists, Loomer’s experience is a lesson in vigilance and commitment to ethical practices. It’s a reminder that the industry must continue to value originality and transparency. The competition for breaking news can be fierce, but it’s essential to maintain integrity.

When reporting on stories, always ensure that you’re giving credit where it’s due. If you’re inspired by another journalist’s work, citing them not only enhances your credibility but also fosters a sense of community within the industry. After all, we’re all in this together, striving to inform the public and tell impactful stories.

Engaging with Readers and Building Trust

As readers, we should be active participants in the journalistic process. Engaging with stories, asking questions, and seeking clarity on reporting practices are all ways we can contribute to a healthier media landscape. If we notice something amiss, like a lack of attribution, don’t hesitate to voice concerns. The more we advocate for ethical journalism, the stronger the industry can become.

In the end, the incident involving Loomer and the NYP serves as a reminder that journalism is about more than just delivering news. It’s about building trust, maintaining accountability, and ensuring that every voice is heard and respected. By promoting ethical practices and honoring original reporting, we can help shape a media landscape that values creativity, integrity, and transparency.