• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

No, this is not a villa or 'Sheesh Mahal' , this is the house of an ordinary Pro Modi and BJP News Anchor Rubika Liyaqat.

This is how lucrative it is to sit in studios and sell hate 24/7.

This person has justified bulldozing the houses of the poor in UP, just take a look at

The tweet by Roshan Rai highlights the stark contrast between the lifestyles of certain media personalities and the societal issues they often discuss. Specifically, it focuses on Rubika Liyaqat, a prominent pro-Modi and BJP news anchor, suggesting that her affluent lifestyle is a result of her role in perpetuating divisive narratives in the media. The tweet draws attention to the broader implications of media influence in India, particularly concerning the justification of controversial government actions, such as the demolition of houses belonging to economically disadvantaged individuals in Uttar Pradesh (UP).

### The Power of Media Influence

In the current digital age, media has become a powerful tool for shaping public opinion. News anchors and journalists wield significant influence, often using their platforms to promote specific political ideologies. Rubika Liyaqat is portrayed as a key figure in this narrative, as her endorsement of government policies aligns closely with the ruling party’s agenda. This raises important questions about the responsibilities of media professionals and their role in either fostering or combating societal divides.

### Economic Disparities and Media Representation

The tweet underscores a crucial issue: the economic disparities that exist within Indian society. By juxtaposing Liyaqat’s luxurious lifestyle with the struggles of the poor—particularly those whose homes have been bulldozed—the message is clear: the media can often misrepresent or overlook the hardships faced by marginalized communities. This selective portrayal can lead to a skewed understanding of the socio-economic climate in the country, where the rich get richer and the poor are left to suffer the consequences of government policies justified by influential media figures.

### The Justification of Government Actions

One of the most alarming aspects highlighted in the tweet is Liyaqat’s justification of the bulldozing of homes in UP. Such actions, often framed as “development” or “urban renewal,” can lead to devastating consequences for those affected. The media’s role in endorsing or questioning these actions is vital in shaping public perception. When news anchors choose to support government decisions without critically analyzing their impacts, they contribute to a culture of intolerance and disregard for human rights.

### Call for Responsible Journalism

The implications of Rai’s tweet extend beyond Liyaqat herself; they call for a broader discussion about responsible journalism. Media professionals have a duty to report ethically and to provide a balanced perspective that includes the voices of those who are often marginalized. Encouraging a dialogue that recognizes the struggles of all citizens, rather than amplifying divisive narratives, is essential for fostering a more inclusive society.

### Conclusion

In conclusion, the tweet by Roshan Rai serves as a poignant reminder of the responsibilities held by media figures like Rubika Liyaqat. As they navigate the complex landscape of political reporting, it is crucial for them to consider the broader implications of their narratives. By prioritizing ethical journalism, media professionals can contribute to a more equitable society, where the voices of the poor and marginalized are heard and respected. The conversation initiated by this tweet is one that requires ongoing attention in the ever-evolving landscape of Indian media and politics.

No, this is not a villa or ‘Sheesh Mahal’ , this is the house of an ordinary Pro Modi and BJP News Anchor Rubika Liyaqat.

This is how lucrative it is to sit in studios and sell hate 24/7.

This person has justified bulldozing the houses of the poor in UP, just take a look at… pic.twitter.com/T5kH4yekbO

— Roshan Rai (@RoshanKrRaii) March 29, 2025

No, this is not a villa or ‘Sheesh Mahal’, this is the house of an ordinary Pro Modi and BJP News Anchor Rubika Liyaqat.

When you think of a news anchor, especially one known for their strong political biases, you might picture a modest living space. But that’s not the case for Rubika Liyaqat, a prominent Pro Modi and BJP news anchor. The recent tweet by Roshan Rai sparked widespread discussion about the luxurious lifestyle that Liyaqat leads, which some argue stands in stark contrast to the narratives she promotes on air. The tweet features a photo of Liyaqat’s home, likening it to a grand villa or ‘Sheesh Mahal.’ It raises an important question: how do we reconcile the wealth of media personalities with the often harsh realities they report on?

This is how lucrative it is to sit in studios and sell hate 24/7.

In the world of media, particularly in politically charged environments, the line between journalism and opinion can blur. Rubika Liyaqat’s style has often been characterized as aggressive and polarizing, leading some to label her approach as “selling hate.” The financial rewards that come from such a career can be substantial. For many news anchors, especially those aligned with powerful political parties like the BJP, the paychecks can reflect the influence they wield. It’s a lucrative business model—engaging viewers with sensationalism and divisive rhetoric often translates into higher ratings and, ultimately, higher salaries.

This person has justified bulldozing the houses of the poor in UP, just take a look at…

What’s particularly troubling is the content of Liyaqat’s commentary. There have been instances where she has justified extreme measures, such as the bulldozing of houses belonging to the poor in Uttar Pradesh (UP). Such actions raise ethical questions about the responsibilities of journalists and media figures. Are they merely reporting on events, or are they actively shaping public opinion? The implications of their words can have real-world consequences, often affecting the most vulnerable populations. This is not just about political loyalty; it’s about human lives.

The public’s perception of media personalities like Rubika Liyaqat.

Public figures in media are often scrutinized for their actions and the narratives they promote. Rubika Liyaqat is no exception. Many viewers feel that her pro-BJP stance compromises journalistic integrity. The backlash against her statements and lifestyle is indicative of a broader skepticism towards media figures who seem disconnected from the realities of ordinary citizens. Critics argue that a news anchor who justifies the destruction of homes for political purposes cannot truly grasp the struggles faced by the people affected by such policies.

The impact of social media on public discourse.

Social media platforms like Twitter have become battlegrounds for opinions, and the tweet by Roshan Rai serves as a prime example of how quickly narratives can spread. The platform enables ordinary citizens to challenge public figures and hold them accountable for their statements. It’s a double-edged sword; while it allows for democratized discourse, it can also lead to misinformation and polarizing debates. Engaging with complex issues requires nuance, something that is often lost in the fast-paced nature of social media.

Finding a balance in political reporting.

As consumers of news, it’s crucial to approach political reporting with a critical eye. We should ask ourselves: Are we getting the full story? Are the voices of those affected being heard? Anchors like Rubika Liyaqat play a significant role in shaping public perception, and with that power comes responsibility. It’s essential for media figures to strive for a balance between their personal biases and the ethical obligations of journalism.

The responsibility of journalists in a democratic society.

In a democracy, the media serves as a watchdog, holding power to account and providing a platform for diverse voices. When journalists lean too far in one direction, they risk undermining this essential role. The case of Rubika Liyaqat illustrates how the intersection of wealth, influence, and media representation can complicate the narrative. As viewers, we must demand transparency, accountability, and a commitment to ethical journalism from those who shape our understanding of current events.

The way forward: Media literacy and critical engagement.

In an era where misinformation can spread as quickly as facts, media literacy becomes increasingly important. Understanding the motives behind news coverage and the backgrounds of those delivering it can empower viewers to make informed decisions. Engaging critically with media not only allows us to better understand the world around us but also encourages accountability among those in positions of power. As we navigate the complexities of modern journalism, let’s prioritize dialogue, empathy, and informed discourse over division and hate.

“`
This article is structured to encourage engagement while addressing the complex issues surrounding media personalities like Rubika Liyaqat. It emphasizes the need for ethical journalism and critical media consumption in contemporary society.