• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

"People are talking in Allahabad that Advocate's business is Done & Dusted now. Why not PAY the JUDGES directly, than paying to lawyers."

~ Anil Tiwari, Allahabad Bar Association President.

He further says Democracy will COLLAPSE if people's faith on Judiciary is shaken.

In a recent statement that has sparked considerable discussion in legal and political circles, Anil Tiwari, the President of the Allahabad Bar Association, expressed his concerns regarding the state of the judiciary in India. Tiwari emphasized that there are rumors circulating in Allahabad suggesting that the legal profession, particularly the practice of advocacy, is facing significant challenges, leading to a belief that the business of lawyers is “done and dusted.”

### Growing Concerns Over Judicial Integrity

Tiwari’s remarks highlight a troubling sentiment among the public regarding the integrity of the judiciary. He provocatively suggested that instead of paying lawyers, individuals might as well pay judges directly. This statement underscores a critical issue: the potential erosion of trust in the legal system. If the public begins to believe that the judiciary is compromised, it raises serious questions about the future of democracy itself. Tiwari warned that such a loss of faith could lead to the collapse of democratic institutions, emphasizing the vital role that public confidence plays in the functioning of the legal system.

### The Role of Lawyers in Upholding Justice

While advocating for the legal profession, Tiwari’s comments reflect a broader concern that the perception of lawyers is deteriorating. Lawyers are essential for upholding justice and ensuring that individuals receive fair representation. The insinuation that direct payments to judges might be a solution undermines the fundamental principles of justice and fairness that the legal profession stands for. This sentiment not only threatens the livelihood of advocates but also raises ethical concerns about the judicial process.

### The Impact on Democracy

The dialogue surrounding Tiwari’s remarks has significant implications for democracy in India. A robust judicial system is a cornerstone of democratic governance, ensuring that laws are applied fairly and without bias. When citizens lose faith in the judiciary, the very fabric of democracy is at risk. Tiwari’s warning serves as a clarion call for all stakeholders – from legal practitioners to policymakers – to address the growing discontent and work towards restoring public confidence in the judicial system.

### Solutions and Future Directions

To combat these challenges, it is imperative for the legal community and lawmakers to engage in transparent discussions about judicial reforms. Initiatives aimed at enhancing the accountability and transparency of the judiciary could help rebuild trust. Additionally, continuous education and awareness campaigns about the role of lawyers in democracy can help shift public perception positively.

### Conclusion

In conclusion, Anil Tiwari’s statements reflect a critical juncture for the legal profession and the judiciary in India. The potential collapse of faith in the legal system poses a serious threat to democracy. It is crucial for the legal community to address these concerns proactively, fostering a system that is not only just but also perceived as just by the public. Restoring trust in the judiciary will require collective efforts from lawyers, judges, and lawmakers alike, ensuring that democracy remains strong and resilient in the face of challenges. As discussions around this issue evolve, the importance of maintaining integrity within the legal system cannot be overstated.

“People are talking in Allahabad that Advocate’s business is Done & Dusted now. Why not PAY the JUDGES directly, than paying to lawyers.”

~ Anil Tiwari, Allahabad Bar Association President.

He further says Democracy will COLLAPSE if people’s faith on Judiciary is shaken. pic.twitter.com/M5Srk5z8Do

— The Analyzer (News Updates) (@Indian_Analyzer) March 29, 2025

People are talking in Allahabad that Advocate’s business is Done & Dusted now.

It’s no secret that the legal system can often feel like a maze, filled with complicated rules and intricate procedures. Recently, Anil Tiwari, the President of the Allahabad Bar Association, stirred the pot with his provocative statement regarding the judiciary. He suggested, “Why not PAY the JUDGES directly, than paying to lawyers?” This comment has sparked a wave of discussions across the legal community and among the general public. Tiwari’s assertion raises essential questions about the role of lawyers, judges, and the overall trust in our judicial system.

Understanding the Context of the Statement

In a world where legal fees can skyrocket and the path to justice seems daunting, Tiwari’s remarks resonate with many who feel disillusioned. The sentiment that advocates’ businesses are “Done & Dusted” reflects a broader concern about the effectiveness and efficiency of the legal system. When individuals feel that their lawyers are more concerned about fees than justice, it undermines the entire legal framework. These concerns aren’t just whispers in the wind; they reflect a growing frustration that many people in Allahabad and beyond are vocalizing.

The Implications of Paying Judges Directly

The idea of directly compensating judges rather than lawyers raises eyebrows. While it might seem like a straightforward solution, it opens a Pandora’s box of ethical dilemmas. Would this create a conflict of interest? What safeguards would be in place to ensure fairness? Tiwari’s comments hint at a desire for reform, but it’s essential to consider the ramifications of such a significant shift in how we perceive judicial compensation. Would it enhance transparency or lead to a system where only the wealthy could afford justice?

Democracy and the Judiciary: A Fragile Balance

In his statement, Tiwari further warned that “Democracy will COLLAPSE if people’s faith on Judiciary is shaken.” This assertion highlights the crucial role that public trust plays in the function of democracy. When citizens lose faith in the institutions meant to protect their rights, the foundation of democracy begins to crack. The judiciary serves as a check on power, and if the public perceives it as biased or corrupt, the entire democratic process can falter.

The Role of Public Perception in Legal Systems

Public perception is a powerful force. If people start believing that the system is rigged or that justice is only accessible to those who can pay hefty legal fees, we risk creating a society where the law is seen as a tool for the privileged. This is particularly concerning in a country like India, where access to justice is already a significant issue. Tiwari’s comments resonate because they echo what many people are feeling: a disconnection between the legal system and the everyday citizen.

The Need for Judicial Reforms

As discussions about the judiciary continue, it’s clear that reform is necessary. Whether it’s reevaluating how lawyers are compensated, increasing transparency in judicial proceedings, or finding ways to restore public trust, these conversations are critical. Advocates like Anil Tiwari are bringing these issues to the forefront, prompting us to think critically about the future of justice in our society. It’s not just about the lawyers and judges; it’s about the people who rely on these institutions for fairness and protection.

Engaging with the Community

For many, the legal system feels distant and unapproachable. Engaging with the community through forums, discussions, and outreach initiatives can help bridge this gap. When people feel involved in the conversation about justice, they are more likely to trust the system. Tiwari’s remarks can serve as a catalyst for such engagement, urging both legal professionals and laypeople to come together to discuss potential solutions to the issues plaguing the judiciary.

Looking Ahead: What Can Be Done?

So, what can be done to address the concerns raised by Tiwari and the community in Allahabad? First, fostering open dialogue about the role of lawyers and judges is essential. Next, exploring innovative compensation models that prioritize access to justice for all citizens could be a step in the right direction. Lastly, increasing transparency in judicial processes can help restore faith in the system. The journey may be complex, but it’s necessary for the health of our democracy.

Final Thoughts

Ultimately, the comments by Anil Tiwari reflect a larger conversation about trust, justice, and democracy. As people continue to express their concerns, it’s vital for legal professionals, lawmakers, and the public to engage in meaningful discussions. The future of our judicial system depends on it.