• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

They would literally need to create a new internet for the number of think pieces in the media if Joe Biden was unaware that there were four missing and presumed dead service members hours after the story was reported, but Trump just gets away with it.

In a recent tweet that has sparked widespread discussion, attorney and social media commentator, @scarylawyerguy, raised a provocative point about media coverage and public perception regarding political leaders. The tweet suggests that if President Joe Biden were to be unaware of the tragic situation involving four missing and presumed dead service members—reported just hours earlier—there would be an uproar in the media, resulting in an avalanche of critical think pieces. In contrast, the tweet implies that former President Donald Trump has historically evaded similar scrutiny for his actions and statements. This commentary touches on broader themes of media bias, accountability, and the differing standards applied to political figures.

### Media Accountability and Political Leadership

The crux of the tweet emphasizes a perceived double standard in how politicians are treated by the media. It raises important questions about accountability and the expectations placed on current and former leaders. For instance, Biden’s potential ignorance about the situation of military personnel could be seen as a significant lapse in responsibility, one that would likely trigger widespread criticism and calls for accountability. On the other hand, the tweet insinuates that Trump has faced less backlash for his own controversial statements and actions during his presidency, suggesting an inconsistency in media scrutiny.

### Public Perception and Political Bias

This disparity in media treatment not only reflects on the politicians involved but also shapes public perception. The notion that Biden would receive harsher criticism than Trump for similar lapses highlights a divide in how different political figures are perceived by the media and their supporters. This can lead to a skewed understanding of political accountability and may influence voter behavior and attitudes toward governance. The tweet serves as a reminder that media narratives can significantly impact the political landscape, often perpetuating biases that align with pre-existing beliefs.

### The Role of Social Media in Political Discourse

Social media platforms, such as Twitter, play a crucial role in facilitating discussions about political accountability and media representation. The ability for individuals to express their opinions and critique public figures instantly allows for a more democratized form of discourse, but it also risks amplifying polarizing views. The tweet from @scarylawyerguy encapsulates this dynamic, as it reflects a personal viewpoint while also inviting broader conversation about the media’s role in shaping political narratives.

### Conclusion: A Call for Fairness in Reporting

Ultimately, the implications of @scarylawyerguy’s tweet extend beyond the specific incident involving President Biden and missing service members. It calls for a more equitable approach to political reporting, one that holds all leaders to similar standards, regardless of their party affiliation. As the conversation around media accountability continues to evolve, it is essential for journalists and commentators alike to strive for fairness, ensuring that all political figures are subject to the same level of scrutiny. This will not only enhance the integrity of political discourse but also foster a more informed electorate capable of making decisions based on comprehensive and unbiased information.

The discussion initiated by this tweet underscores the complex relationship between media, politics, and public perception, highlighting the need for ongoing dialogue and critical analysis in the realm of political communication.

They would literally need to create a new internet for the number of think pieces in the media if Joe Biden was unaware that there were four missing and presumed dead service members hours after the story was reported, but Trump just gets away with it. https://t.co/rze4FvpGsP

— scary lawyerguy (@scarylawyerguy) March 27, 2025

They would literally need to create a new internet for the number of think pieces in the media if Joe Biden was unaware that there were four missing and presumed dead service members hours after the story was reported, but Trump just gets away with it.

When it comes to political narratives and media scrutiny, the scales often tilt dramatically depending on who’s in charge. Recently, a tweet from @scarylawyerguy encapsulated this sentiment perfectly. Imagine a scenario where President Joe Biden was unaware of four missing and presumed dead service members just hours after the story broke. The media frenzy would be explosive, with think pieces flooding the internet. Yet, in stark contrast, former President Donald Trump seems to glide past similar situations with minimal backlash. Why does this disparity exist?

The Media’s Reaction: A Double Standard?

The media has long been critiqued for its inconsistent coverage of political figures, particularly when it comes to the actions and statements of the President. In this case, if Biden were caught off-guard about service members’ fates, it would likely trigger an avalanche of articles scrutinizing his leadership and awareness. Think pieces would pop up faster than you could refresh your Twitter feed. The narrative would center around his competency, his empathy, and his connection to the military.

On the flip side, Trump has often managed to dodge intense criticism even after making statements that would typically warrant widespread condemnation. This raises questions about the media’s role and responsibility in framing these narratives. Is it a matter of bias, or is it simply that the public has become desensitized to Trump’s controversial behavior?

Public Perception and Its Role in Media Coverage

Public perception plays a crucial role in how these stories unfold. Trump’s supporters often brush off his remarks, viewing them through a lens of loyalty and defense. In contrast, Biden’s supporters are more likely to hold him accountable, expecting a higher standard of awareness and empathy, especially concerning military matters. This sets the stage for a media environment where the stakes are higher for one president compared to the other.

Moreover, the political landscape is inherently polarized. For Biden, any misstep can be magnified, while Trump’s gaffes are often downplayed or rationalized. This phenomenon isn’t new; it’s been a recurring theme in American politics. The question, however, remains: why does the media landscape allow such discrepancies to persist?

Think Pieces and the Internet’s Role

The internet has transformed the way we consume news and opinion. With blogs, social media, and online publications, the floodgates for think pieces have opened wide. In the age of digital media, every misstep, comment, or decision is dissected and debated, often leading to sensational headlines and clickbait articles.

If Biden were to show a lack of knowledge about missing service members, it wouldn’t just be a headline; it would be a full-blown crisis, complete with countless analyses dissecting every angle. The narrative would shift from a simple mistake to a broader commentary on his presidency. On the contrary, Trump’s off-the-cuff remarks rarely receive the same level of scrutiny, allowing him to navigate controversies with relative ease.

A Call for Accountability

As citizens and consumers of news, it’s essential to ask for consistency in media coverage. The disparity in how Biden and Trump are treated highlights a broader issue within journalism and public discourse. Holding leaders accountable should not depend on their party affiliation or the political climate; rather, it should be a standard expectation across the board.

The idea that “they would literally need to create a new internet” to house the think pieces on Biden’s potential ignorance reflects the underlying frustration many feel. It’s a call for fair treatment and equal scrutiny, irrespective of political alliances.

Moving Forward: What Can Be Done?

So, what can we do as engaged citizens? Start by demanding fair and balanced reporting. Support media outlets that prioritize in-depth journalism over sensationalism. Encourage conversations that focus on accountability for all political figures, regardless of party lines.

Additionally, engaging in discussions on social media platforms can also help shift the narrative. Sharing well-researched articles and thoughtful analyses can contribute to a more informed public discourse. In a world where misinformation spreads like wildfire, advocating for truthful and balanced reporting is more critical than ever.

Ultimately, we should strive for a media landscape that holds all leaders to the same standards. Whether it’s Biden, Trump, or any future political figure, accountability should be universal. In doing so, we can foster a more informed and engaged citizenry, ready to hold our leaders accountable while promoting meaningful discussions around leadership and responsibility.

In this day and age, where every word can be a headline, the media’s role is more crucial than ever. Let’s ensure that the conversation remains fair, balanced, and focused on the issues that matter most.