• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

"Should the Defense Secretary.."
Marjorie Taylor Greene: "Wait what country are you from?"
"From the UK"
"OK we don't give a crap about your opinion and your reporting. Why don't you go back to your country. We have a major migrant problem. You should care about your own borders"

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Controversial Remarks on Migration

In a recent Twitter exchange that has sparked significant debate, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene made headlines with her remarks regarding immigration and international opinions on U.S. border policies. The conversation was initiated when a journalist from the UK posed a question to the Defense Secretary, prompting Greene’s heated response.

The Exchange

In a video clip shared on Twitter, Greene can be heard asking the journalist, "Wait, what country are you from?" Upon learning that the journalist is from the UK, she immediately dismissed their opinion, saying, "OK, we don’t give a crap about your opinion and your reporting." Greene then continued to emphasize the importance of focusing on domestic issues, particularly the "major migrant problem" she believes the U.S. is facing. Her statement concluded with an admonition for the journalist to "care about your own borders."

This exchange highlights Greene’s ongoing focus on immigration as a central issue and her often aggressive stance against foreign criticism of U.S. policies. Greene’s comments have attracted both support and backlash, reflecting the polarized views on immigration in America today.

Context of Greene’s Remarks

Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican representative from Georgia, has become known for her controversial statements and strong opinions on various issues, including immigration and border security. Her remarks during this Twitter exchange echo a broader sentiment among certain political factions in the U.S. that prioritize national sovereignty and border control. Greene’s approach often resonates with her base, who view her as a staunch defender of American interests against foreign interference.

The topic of immigration has been a contentious one in the U.S., with opinions sharply divided along party lines. Many Republicans argue for stricter border enforcement and policies aimed at reducing illegal immigration, while Democrats typically advocate for more lenient immigration policies and comprehensive reform. Greene’s comments fit squarely within the Republican narrative, emphasizing the need to prioritize American citizens’ concerns over international perspectives.

Reactions to Greene’s Statements

The reaction to Greene’s comments has been swift and varied. Supporters praise her for standing up against what they perceive as unwarranted foreign criticism and for highlighting the urgency of domestic issues like immigration. Critics, on the other hand, argue that her remarks reflect a narrow-minded approach to international dialogue and an unwillingness to engage with global perspectives.

Social media platforms have amplified these discussions, with many users sharing their views on Greene’s statements. The exchange has ignited debates not only about immigration policy but also about the role of foreign opinions in shaping U.S. policy decisions.

Conclusion

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s recent remarks have once again placed her at the center of a national conversation about immigration and the influence of foreign voices in American politics. Her combative approach resonates with many within her party, while simultaneously drawing criticism from those who advocate for a more inclusive dialogue. As the U.S. continues to grapple with complex immigration issues, Greene’s statements will likely remain a focal point in discussions about border security and national identity. The polarized nature of these discussions suggests that immigration will remain a hot-button issue in American politics for the foreseeable future.

For those interested in the evolving landscape of immigration policy and political discourse in the U.S., Greene’s remarks serve as a critical example of the tensions that define contemporary debates on this vital issue.

“Should the Defense Secretary..”
Marjorie Taylor Greene: “Wait what country are you from?”
“From the UK”
“OK we don’t give a crap about your opinion and your reporting. Why don’t you go back to your country. We have a major migrant problem. You should care about your own borders” pic.twitter.com/l1lYrYdEbH

— Howard Mortman (@HowardMortman) March 26, 2025

Should the Defense Secretary..

In a recent exchange that has sparked considerable debate online, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene found herself in a heated dialogue with a British journalist about U.S. immigration policy. The discussion ignited when Greene abruptly questioned the journalist’s nationality, asking, “Wait what country are you from?” This exchange has drawn attention not just for its tone but also for the larger implications it raises regarding international perspectives on U.S. immigration issues. It’s a reflection of how political discourse can often spiral into nationalistic sentiments, especially when discussing sensitive topics like immigration.

Marjorie Taylor Greene: “Wait what country are you from?”

The back-and-forth began when Greene challenged the journalist’s viewpoint on a matter she clearly felt passionate about. The journalist, identifying as being “from the UK,” prompted Greene’s dismissive response: “OK we don’t give a crap about your opinion and your reporting.” This kind of rhetoric isn’t unusual in today’s political climate, where voices from outside the U.S. frequently face skepticism or outright rejection when they comment on American policies.

This incident is not just about one politician’s reaction; it underscores a growing trend where national borders seem to dictate whose opinions are valued in political discussions. As Greene suggested, there are pressing issues at home, particularly related to migration, that require attention and solutions. The phrase “we have a major migrant problem” reflects a sentiment shared by many who feel that immigration policy is a critical issue needing urgent address.

“From the UK”

When the journalist identified themselves as being “from the UK,” it highlighted a broader conversation about how international perspectives on U.S. policy are received. While Greene’s rebuttal may resonate with some, many argue that foreign perspectives can offer valuable insights into how policies are perceived globally. Countries around the world often deal with their own immigration challenges, and sharing experiences could foster understanding and improvement in policy-making.

Critics of Greene’s stance suggest that dismissing foreign opinions outright can lead to an insular approach to governance. As the world becomes increasingly interconnected, understanding and considering different viewpoints can be crucial in formulating effective policies. The exchange raises pertinent questions: Should U.S. lawmakers be more open to international perspectives on domestic issues? Can ignoring these views do more harm than good?

OK we don’t give a crap about your opinion and your reporting.

Greene’s blunt retort, “OK we don’t give a crap about your opinion and your reporting,” resonated with many on social media, generating a wave of reactions. Some defended her stance, arguing that American issues should primarily concern American citizens. Others criticized her for stifling dialogue and disregarding potentially helpful insights from abroad.

This moment encapsulates the broader contentious atmosphere surrounding immigration in the United States. The phrase “we don’t give a crap” indicates not only frustration but also a growing unwillingness to engage in discussions that involve external viewpoints. The conversation about immigration is often polarized, with differing opinions on how to handle the “major migrant problem” Greene mentioned. This polarization can hinder the development of comprehensive solutions.

Why don’t you go back to your country?

Greene’s follow-up remark, “Why don’t you go back to your country,” has been interpreted as a dismissal of international perspectives that often contribute positively to policy discussions. While her comment may have been made in the heat of the moment, it points to a larger issue of nationalism that can undermine constructive dialogue.

The reality is that global migration is complex and multifaceted. Countries around the world grapple with similar challenges, and learning from each other’s experiences could lead to better outcomes for all involved. By shutting down conversations with a sentiment of “stay in your lane,” there’s a risk of missing out on potential solutions that could address the very concerns Greene herself raised.

We have a major migrant problem.

The phrase “we have a major migrant problem” encapsulates a central issue in U.S. politics today. The migration crisis has become a hot-button topic, with different factions advocating for various solutions. Greene’s statement reflects the urgency felt by many Americans regarding border security and immigration policies. However, the challenge lies in finding a balance between enforcing borders and allowing for humane migration practices.

Immigration reform is a complex issue that requires thoughtful discussion and collaboration among lawmakers, advocacy groups, and citizens. Public opinion is deeply divided on how best to approach immigration, with some advocating for stricter measures and others calling for more compassionate policies. Greene’s comments may resonate with those who prioritize border security, but they also risk alienating those who advocate for a more inclusive approach.

You should care about your own borders

Greene’s assertion that the journalist “should care about your own borders” brings us back to a fundamental point about sovereignty and governance. Each nation has the right to prioritize its own issues, but in an increasingly globalized world, addressing immigration requires cooperation and understanding beyond borders. Ignoring the experiences of other nations may lead to missed opportunities for learning and growth.

In summary, the exchange between Greene and the journalist raises critical questions about nationalism, immigration, and the importance of dialogue in addressing complex issues. While it’s easy to dismiss foreign opinions, doing so may hinder the progress needed to tackle significant challenges like migration. As the political landscape continues to evolve, fostering open conversations—regardless of their origin—could be key to finding effective solutions.