• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

Paying off thugs for having assaulted Police and hunted down members of Congress is a Fascist move. Mussolini had his blackshirts on secret police payrolls to reward them for past violence.

In a recent tweet, historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat made a provocative statement regarding the implications of paying off violent groups in the context of political order. Drawing a parallel between contemporary events and historical fascism, Ben-Ghiat argues that compensating thugs for their violent actions against police and members of Congress is reminiscent of Mussolini’s regime, where violence was not only tolerated but also rewarded. This comparison raises important questions about the erosion of democratic values and the normalization of violence in politics.

### Understanding Fascism and Political Violence

Fascism, as a political ideology, is characterized by authoritarianism, nationalism, and the suppression of dissent. One of the hallmarks of fascist regimes is the use of violence as a tool for maintaining power and instilling fear. In Mussolini’s Italy, the blackshirts, a paramilitary group, were often on the payroll of the state, effectively legitimizing their violent tactics. This historical reference serves as a cautionary tale about the potential normalization of violence in modern political discourse.

### Current Political Climate

Ben-Ghiat’s tweet reflects growing concerns about the current political climate in the United States and elsewhere, where instances of political violence have become more pronounced. The suggestion that financial incentives are being offered to individuals or groups for violent acts against law enforcement or elected officials raises alarms about the state of democracy. If such actions go unchecked, they could pave the way for a more authoritarian system, undermining the principles of justice and rule of law.

### The Role of Accountability

In democracies, it is crucial to hold individuals accountable for their actions, especially when it involves violence against the state or its representatives. The failure to do so not only emboldens violent actors but also sends a message that such behavior can be rewarded rather than punished. This can create a dangerous precedent where violence becomes an acceptable means of political expression, leading to further instability and division within society.

### Historical Context and Lessons Learned

Reflecting on the past, it is evident that political violence has often been met with a mix of repression and reward in authoritarian regimes. The historical context provided by Ben-Ghiat serves as a reminder of the fragility of democracy. It calls for vigilance among citizens and political leaders alike to ensure that the values of democracy are upheld and that violence is unequivocally condemned.

### The Path Forward

To prevent a slide into authoritarianism, it is essential for society to engage in open dialogue about the implications of political violence and the responsibilities of leadership. Citizens must demand accountability and transparency from their leaders and reject any form of violence as a means to achieve political ends.

In conclusion, Ruth Ben-Ghiat’s tweet serves as a stark warning about the potential consequences of normalizing violence in politics. By drawing parallels to historical fascism, she highlights the importance of protecting democratic institutions and upholding the rule of law. As we navigate the complexities of today’s political landscape, it is imperative to learn from the past and strive for a society where violence is neither condoned nor rewarded, ensuring the preservation of democratic values for future generations.

Paying off thugs for having assaulted Police and hunted down members of Congress is a Fascist move. Mussolini had his blackshirts on secret police payrolls to reward them for past violence. https://t.co/iteivPNAKI

— Ruth Ben-Ghiat (@ruthbenghiat) March 26, 2025

Paying Off Thugs for Having Assaulted Police and Hunted Down Members of Congress is a Fascist Move

In recent discussions, a striking comparison has been drawn between modern political actions and those from historical fascist regimes. Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a prominent historian, made a bold statement about the practice of “paying off thugs for having assaulted police and hunted down members of Congress,” suggesting that this behavior is reminiscent of fascist tactics. This comparison inevitably invites us to reflect on the nature of political power, violence, and accountability.

Mussolini and the Blackshirts: A Historical Parallel

When we think about fascism, names like Benito Mussolini often come to mind. Mussolini’s regime was notorious for its use of violence and intimidation to maintain control. The infamous Blackshirts, Mussolini’s paramilitary group, operated with impunity, often engaging in violence against political opponents. They were effectively rewarded for their actions, similar to how Ben-Ghiat suggests current events are unfolding.

Just as Mussolini had his Blackshirts on secret police payrolls, the implication here is that contemporary leaders might be rewarding violent actors for their loyalty or service. This creates a dangerous precedent where violence is not only tolerated but incentivized. It raises critical questions about the rule of law and the ethical responsibilities of those in power.

The Role of Violence in Politics

Violence has been a tool used throughout history to achieve political ends. It’s not just a matter of physical aggression; it’s about instilling fear and asserting dominance. In many instances, violence can sway public opinion or suppress dissent. This phenomenon is particularly concerning in democratic societies where the expectation is that disputes should be settled through dialogue and legal processes.

The idea of rewarding individuals who engage in violence undermines the very foundation of democracy. It sends a message that might makes right, which is fundamentally opposed to the principles of justice and equality. When political leaders choose to pay off those who have assaulted police or threatened elected officials, we must ask ourselves what message is being sent to the public.

Implications for Democracy

The implications of such actions are profound. Democracies thrive on accountability, transparency, and the rule of law. When those in power begin to blur the lines between law enforcement and political loyalty, it raises alarms about the integrity of our institutions. It shifts the focus from protecting citizens and upholding justice to maintaining power at any cost.

The erosion of these foundational principles can lead to a slippery slope towards authoritarianism. When violence is legitimized as a means to an end, it can create a cycle of retribution and conflict that is difficult to break. Citizens may feel compelled to take matters into their own hands, leading to further unrest and division.

Historical Context and Contemporary Relevance

Understanding the historical context of fascism helps clarify why comparisons to Mussolini’s regime are not merely hyperbolic. Fascism often emerges during times of social unrest, economic hardship, and political instability. Leaders capitalize on public fear and dissatisfaction, using violence as a tool to consolidate power.

Today, many societies face challenges that echo past struggles. Economic inequality, social division, and political polarization create fertile ground for extremist ideologies to take root. In this environment, the actions of political leaders can either exacerbate tensions or promote healing and reconciliation.

It’s essential to remain vigilant and critically assess the behaviors and rhetoric of those in power. Engaging with history, as Ben-Ghiat does, allows us to recognize patterns and avoid repeating the mistakes of the past.

The Role of Citizens in Protecting Democracy

As citizens, we play a crucial role in safeguarding democracy. Being informed and engaged is vital. This means not only voting but also holding elected officials accountable for their actions and decisions. When we see behaviors that resemble fascist tactics, such as rewarding violence or intimidation, it’s our responsibility to speak out and demand accountability.

Public discourse is a powerful tool for change. By discussing these issues openly, we can raise awareness and encourage others to reflect on the implications of political violence. Social media, as highlighted by Ben-Ghiat’s tweet, serves as a platform for these critical conversations, allowing voices to reach wider audiences.

Moving Forward: A Call for Accountability

In light of the serious implications of normalizing violence in politics, we must advocate for accountability. Political leaders should be held to a standard that prioritizes peace, dialogue, and justice over coercion and intimidation. This is not just about preventing violence; it’s about fostering a culture where dissent is respected and addressed through lawful means.

By prioritizing the rule of law and respecting democratic norms, we can create a society that stands firmly against the tactics employed by historical fascist regimes. It’s a collective effort that requires vigilance, courage, and a commitment to justice for all citizens.

The statement by Ruth Ben-Ghiat resonates deeply in today’s political climate. By recognizing the echoes of history in present-day actions, we can strive to build a future that honors the principles of democracy and equality, ensuring that our political landscape is free from the shadows of fascism.