Why hasn’t the US joined the UK Commonwealth? Unpacking History

If the United States joining the UK commonwealth is “no big deal” then why did it not happen before? The United Kingdom is run by globalist who hate the very existence of America. The answer to 1984 is 1776!

In a recent tweet, Alex Jones raised a provocative question regarding the potential of the United States joining the Commonwealth of Nations, commonly referred to as the UK Commonwealth. He suggests that if such a union is perceived as “no big deal,” then the historical reasons for its non-existence should be examined. This inquiry touches on broader themes of nationalism, globalism, and American identity, especially in light of the historical context dating back to 1776.

### Historical Context

The notion of the United States joining the UK Commonwealth is intriguing yet complex. Historically, the U.S. and the UK have had a tumultuous relationship marked by revolution and eventual reconciliation. The American Revolution of 1776 was fundamentally about independence from British rule, establishing a distinct national identity. This historical backdrop makes the idea of rejoining the Commonwealth seem paradoxical to many Americans, who value their sovereignty and independence.

### Globalism vs. Nationalism

Jones also brings attention to what he perceives as a conflict between globalist agendas and American sovereignty. He argues that the leadership in the UK is influenced by globalists who may not prioritize American interests. This perspective resonates with a segment of the population that is wary of international organizations and alliances that may dilute national identity. The fear, as articulated by Jones, is that such globalist influences could undermine the core values that America stands for.

### The Significance of 1776

When Jones references “The answer to 1984 is 1776,” he invokes George Orwell’s dystopian vision in “1984,” contrasting it with the ideals of freedom and liberty embodied in the American Revolution. This comparison emphasizes a belief that the fight for freedom is not just historical but ongoing. For many, 1776 symbolizes a break from tyranny, and the idea of joining a Commonwealth is seen as a potential step towards a loss of that hard-won independence.

### The Debate Around the Commonwealth

The Commonwealth is a political association of 56 member states, most of which are former territories of the British Empire. While it promotes cooperation and mutual support, the idea of the U.S. joining this group raises questions about the implications for American sovereignty. Would membership dilute U.S. influence on the global stage? Would it compromise national interests in favor of collective decisions made by the Commonwealth?

### Conclusion

Alex Jones’s tweet serves as a reminder of the deep-rooted sentiments surrounding national identity and independence. The conversation about the United States potentially joining the UK Commonwealth is not just about politics; it encapsulates a broader cultural struggle between nationalism and globalism. As discussions around international alliances continue to evolve, the historical context of 1776 will remain pivotal in shaping American attitudes toward such proposals. The complexities of such a decision highlight the importance of understanding both historical and contemporary perspectives, ensuring that the values of freedom and independence remain at the forefront of national discourse.

In summary, the implications of the U.S. joining the Commonwealth cannot be overlooked, as it challenges many fundamental beliefs about American identity and sovereignty. As debates continue, it is essential to consider how these discussions reflect broader themes in global governance and national pride.

If the United States joining the UK commonwealth is “no big deal” then why did it not happen before? The United Kingdom is run by globalist who hate the very existence of America. The answer to 1984 is 1776! pic.twitter.com/lAH6X32KPB

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) March 23, 2025

If the United States joining the UK commonwealth is “no big deal” then why did it not happen before?

When you hear discussions about the United States potentially joining the UK Commonwealth, it’s hard not to raise an eyebrow. Many people wonder why such a significant move hasn’t occurred in the past if it’s really “no big deal.” The historical context is rich and complicated. The United States and the United Kingdom have shared a long, intertwined history, but the nuances of this relationship are what make the idea of joining the Commonwealth so contentious.

Back in the day, the relationship between the colonies and Britain was marked by rebellion and a fierce quest for independence. The American Revolution was driven by a desire for self-governance and freedom from what was perceived as oppressive rule. This history fundamentally shapes the current attitudes toward Commonwealth membership. Many Americans still carry the torch of independence, making the concept of joining an organization that has roots in colonialism a tough pill to swallow.

The question remains: if joining the Commonwealth is such a trivial matter, why didn’t it happen before? One reason may lie in national identity. The United States has built its identity around being a nation of freedom and independence, while the Commonwealth is often viewed through a lens of former colonial ties. The concept of joining the Commonwealth might evoke feelings of relinquishing some of that hard-won independence.

The United Kingdom is run by globalists who hate the very existence of America

The sentiment that “the United Kingdom is run by globalists who hate the very existence of America” is a bold statement and one that reflects deep-rooted fears among certain segments of the American populace. The term “globalist” often refers to individuals or entities that advocate for globalization and international cooperation, which can sometimes be at odds with nationalistic sentiments.

This perspective assumes a deep-seated antagonism and distrust between the two nations, suggesting that British leaders might view the U.S. as a threat to their globalist agenda. However, it’s essential to recognize that the relationship between the two countries is multifaceted. While there are certainly political forces that may not always see eye-to-eye, there are also strong ties of friendship and cooperation.

Moreover, globalism and nationalism are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Many advocates of globalization believe that working together can lead to mutual benefits, especially in areas like trade, security, and climate change. So, while some might feel that globalist agendas threaten American interests, others argue that collaboration can enhance America’s global standing.

The answer to 1984 is 1776!

The phrase “the answer to 1984 is 1776” is a provocative way to invoke the spirit of the American Revolution. George Orwell’s dystopian novel “1984” presents a world where freedom and individuality are crushed under oppressive government control. In contrast, 1776—the year of the Declaration of Independence—represents a rebellion against tyranny and the birth of a nation founded on principles of liberty and democracy.

This juxtaposition effectively highlights the tension that exists when discussing concepts like joining the Commonwealth. Many Americans view the potential for closer ties with the UK through the lens of independence vs. control. In their eyes, aligning with the Commonwealth may feel like a step back into the chains of history.

However, it’s important to recognize that the Commonwealth today is not the British Empire of the past. The modern Commonwealth is a voluntary association of independent countries, many of which have their own rich histories and cultural identities. It serves as a platform for collaboration and mutual support rather than a mechanism for colonial domination.

So, while the historical context is essential in understanding current sentiments, the Commonwealth’s modern framework offers an opportunity for nations to engage without compromising their sovereignty.

Why the idea of joining the Commonwealth continues to spark debate

The debate over the U.S. joining the Commonwealth is likely to persist for years to come. For many, it raises questions about national identity, historical grievances, and future aspirations. In an era where global challenges like climate change and economic instability transcend borders, the idea of collaboration becomes increasingly appealing. Yet, the historical baggage complicates this dialogue.

Engaging in this debate requires a nuanced understanding of both the past and present. While some may view the Commonwealth as an opportunity for cooperation, others see it as a potential threat to their freedoms. The challenge lies in finding common ground while respecting individual nations’ identities.

In the end, the conversation about the United States and the Commonwealth is more than just a political discourse; it’s a reflection of how we perceive our place in the world and the relationships we choose to cultivate. As history continues to unfold, so too will the complexities of these discussions.

In essence, the question of whether the U.S. should join the UK Commonwealth remains open-ended, filled with both potential and pitfalls. The discourse surrounding it invites us to reflect on who we are as a nation and where we want to go in the future. Whether it’s through collaboration or independence, the journey will undoubtedly be as complex as the history that precedes it.