• Check out these discounted items on TikTok

BREAKING: GPS data reveals Bernie / AOC turnout was NOT organic.

➠ 84% of the devices present at the Bernie / AOC rally in Denver attended 9 or more Kamala Harris rallies, antifa/BLM, pro-H-mas and pro-Palestinian protests.

➠ 31% of the devices had attended over 20.

In a recent revelation that has sparked considerable debate, GPS data suggests that the turnout at the Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) rally in Denver was not organic, raising questions about the authenticity of grassroots political movements. According to the data shared on Twitter by the account @ExxAlerts, a staggering 84% of the devices present at the rally had previously attended nine or more events associated with Kamala Harris, as well as protests linked to Antifa, Black Lives Matter (BLM), and pro-Palestinian causes. This revelation has prompted discussions about the nature of political engagement and the potential orchestration behind seemingly spontaneous demonstrations.

### Understanding the Implications of the Data

The implications of this data are significant for the political landscape in the United States. With 31% of the devices tracked having attended over 20 events related to these movements, the findings challenge the narrative of organic grassroots support for Sanders and AOC. Instead, they suggest that the turnout may be influenced by coordinated efforts among various activist groups. This could indicate a strategic approach to mobilizing supporters, raising questions about the legitimacy of the rally’s attendance figures.

### The Role of Social Media in Political Mobilization

This incident underscores the critical role of social media in political mobilization. The ability to quickly disseminate information and organize rallies has changed the way political campaigns operate. While social media can empower grassroots movements, it can also be used to create an illusion of widespread support. The findings from the GPS data highlight the need for transparency in political organizing and the importance of discerning genuine grassroots movements from orchestrated events.

### Analyzing Grassroots vs. Organized Movements

The distinction between grassroots and organized movements is vital in understanding modern political dynamics. Grassroots movements typically arise from the community, driven by local issues and authentic public sentiment. In contrast, organized movements may involve pre-planned strategies and coordination among various groups, potentially diluting the authenticity of the public’s voice. The data from the Denver rally suggests that a significant portion of attendees may not represent an organic grassroots effort, but rather a coalition of various organized factions.

### The Future of Political Engagement

As political landscapes continue to evolve, the importance of understanding the nature of political engagement becomes paramount. Voters and activists alike must critically assess the motivations behind attendance at rallies and how these events are portrayed in the media. This GPS data revelation serves as a reminder that the visibility of a movement does not always equate to its legitimacy or grassroots support.

### Conclusion

In conclusion, the GPS data revealing the turnout at the Bernie Sanders and AOC rally in Denver raises critical questions about the nature of political engagement in contemporary America. As discussions about the authenticity of grassroots movements continue, it is essential for voters to remain vigilant and informed. Understanding the dynamics of organized versus organic movements will play a crucial role in shaping future political strategies and voter engagement efforts. Political activism is a powerful tool, and recognizing its authenticity is fundamental to fostering genuine democratic participation.

BREAKING: GPS data reveals Bernie / AOC turnout was NOT organic.

➠ 84% of the devices present at the Bernie / AOC rally in Denver attended 9 or more Kamala Harris rallies, antifa/BLM, pro-H-mas and pro-Palestinian protests.

➠ 31% of the devices had attended over 20. https://t.co/R31fkklaQI

— E X X ➠A L E R T S (@ExxAlerts) March 23, 2025

BREAKING: GPS data reveals Bernie / AOC turnout was NOT organic.

In a surprising revelation, recent GPS data has surfaced indicating that the turnout at the Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) rally in Denver was anything but spontaneous. This news has sparked intense discussions across social media platforms, particularly Twitter, where the announcement first broke. The data suggests that a staggering 84% of the devices present at the rally had previously attended at least nine other events, including rallies for Kamala Harris and various protests related to antifa, Black Lives Matter (BLM), and pro-Palestinian movements.

The implications of this data are significant. If the turnout was not organic, it raises questions about the authenticity of grassroots support for Sanders and AOC, two figures often celebrated for their connection to the populist movement. The idea that a large portion of the crowd may have been mobilized through previous political engagements challenges the narrative that these rallies are purely driven by passionate supporters.

➠ 84% of the devices present at the Bernie / AOC rally in Denver attended 9 or more Kamala Harris rallies, antifa/BLM, pro-H-mas and pro-Palestinian protests.

The breakdown of the data is startling. The finding that 84% of attendees had previously participated in nine or more events linked to Kamala Harris and various protests raises eyebrows about the motives behind their presence at the rally. The same GPS data highlights a trend where political engagement seems interconnected across various movements. This interconnectedness suggests that many rally-goers are not just supporters of Bernie or AOC, but rather part of a broader coalition of progressive activism that spans multiple causes.

This trend can be interpreted in several ways. On one hand, it may suggest an organized effort to consolidate support across different political movements, which can be seen as a strategic advantage for progressive candidates. On the other hand, it could imply a lack of genuine enthusiasm for the specific candidates themselves if attendees are primarily motivated by broader ideological beliefs rather than a personal commitment to Sanders or Ocasio-Cortez.

The question remains: does this data diminish the authenticity of the turnout, or does it simply reflect a diverse coalition united by shared values? Political analysts are already digging deeper into these findings to understand the implications for future rallies and campaigns.

➠ 31% of the devices had attended over 20.

Even more intriguing is the revelation that 31% of the devices tracked had attended over 20 previous events. This statistic paints a picture of a highly mobilized group of activists who are not only engaged but are actively participating in the political landscape. The notion that such a significant percentage of attendees are seasoned political participants brings forth additional layers of complexity to the narrative surrounding the rally.

This data invites further exploration into who these individuals are and what motivates their political activism. Are they part of a professional activist class, or are they everyday citizens deeply invested in social justice issues? With the rise of digital activism and the ease of coordinating events via social media, it’s plausible that these individuals see their participation as a civic duty.

Moreover, the presence of such a large number of experienced activists at the rally could be a double-edged sword for Sanders and AOC. While it may enhance the energy and organization of the event, it also risks alienating those who might feel they don’t belong to this activist community. This could lead to questions about inclusivity and representation within the larger progressive movement.

The Broader Implications of GPS Data

As this GPS data continues to circulate, it’s important to consider the broader implications for political movements and campaigns. The intersection of technology and political activism is becoming more pronounced, with data analytics playing a crucial role in shaping strategies. Candidates and campaign teams must navigate this landscape carefully, understanding that while data can inform engagement tactics, it can also expose vulnerabilities in the narratives they promote.

For voters and supporters, this data raises critical questions about transparency and the authenticity of political engagement. In an era where misinformation can spread like wildfire, being able to discern genuine grassroots support from orchestrated turnout is essential. The conversation surrounding this data isn’t just about Sanders and AOC; it’s about the future of political engagement in a highly digital world.

As we move forward, it will be fascinating to see how political candidates respond to these revelations. Will they double down on their grassroots messaging, or will they take a more strategic approach that acknowledges the complexities of modern political activism? Stay tuned as this story unfolds, and as more data emerges, the landscape of political rallies and activism will continue to evolve.

In summary, the GPS data revealing that the turnout at the Bernie / AOC rally was not organic challenges the traditional narrative of grassroots movements. With 84% of attendees having ties to other political events and 31% being highly active participants, the implications for authenticity and representation in political activism are profound. As this conversation continues, it’s crucial for voters and supporters to critically engage with the evolving dynamics of political turnout.