African Leaders Celebrate USAID Exit, Claims Arikana Chihombori

Former African Union Ambassador to the United States, Arikana Chihombori-Quao says Africa, Hungary and other nations are “celebrating USAID leaving”

USAID “is always supporting opposition. Their form of government advocacy is whoever can keep the government in turmoil”

Reporter

In a recent statement, Arikana Chihombori-Quao, the former African Union Ambassador to the United States, expressed strong sentiments regarding the departure of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) from Africa and other nations, including Hungary. This significant commentary highlights a growing sentiment among various countries that view the exit of USAID as a cause for celebration.

### USAID’s Role in International Relations

USAID has historically played a dual role in international development by providing financial aid and supporting democratic governance in various nations. However, Chihombori-Quao argues that the agency often supports opposition parties, thereby perpetuating political instability in the countries it aims to assist. According to her, USAID’s approach can lead to a form of government advocacy that favors turmoil over stability, which raises questions about the effectiveness of their interventions.

### The Impact of USAID Withdrawal

The departure of USAID from certain regions may signify a shift in how countries like those in Africa and Hungary perceive U.S. foreign assistance. Chihombori-Quao’s comments reflect a broader narrative among some nations that have grown wary of external influences that disrupt their political landscapes. By celebrating USAID’s exit, these countries may be signaling a desire for greater control over their political and economic destinies, free from what they perceive as external meddling.

### Opposition and Political Turmoil

Chihombori-Quao’s critique of USAID aligns with a growing skepticism towards foreign aid organizations. She suggests that the agency’s support for opposition factions can contribute to ongoing political strife, making it challenging for nations to establish stable governance. This perspective resonates with numerous stakeholders who advocate for a more nuanced understanding of the impacts of foreign aid, particularly in regions where political dynamics are already fragile.

### A Call for Sovereignty

By highlighting the negative implications of USAID’s operations, Chihombori-Quao is calling for a reevaluation of how foreign assistance is structured and delivered. Many nations are advocating for sovereignty and self-determination, emphasizing the need for partnerships that respect their autonomy. The response to USAID’s exit can be seen as a rallying cry for nations to embrace their own governance models rather than relying on external support that may undermine their political systems.

### Conclusion

The comments made by Arikana Chihombori-Quao underscore a critical conversation regarding the role of foreign aid in shaping political landscapes across the globe. As countries like those in Africa and Hungary celebrate USAID’s departure, it raises important questions about the effectiveness of foreign intervention and the need for a more collaborative approach to international development. The narrative surrounding USAID’s influence on opposition politics highlights a growing demand for respect and recognition of national sovereignty in the context of foreign aid. As this dialogue continues, it will be essential for policymakers and international organizations to consider the perspectives of the nations they aim to assist, fostering partnerships that prioritize stability and self-determination over external agendas.

Former African Union Ambassador to the United States, Arikana Chihombori-Quao says Africa, Hungary and other nations are “celebrating USAID leaving”

USAID “is always supporting opposition. Their form of government advocacy is whoever can keep the government in turmoil”

Reporter… pic.twitter.com/CL9mt5BpYX

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) March 23, 2025

Former African Union Ambassador to the United States, Arikana Chihombori-Quao says Africa, Hungary and other nations are “celebrating USAID leaving”

In a bold statement that has caught the attention of many, Former African Union Ambassador to the United States, Arikana Chihombori-Quao, expressed that countries like Africa and Hungary are actually celebrating the departure of USAID. This perspective raises significant questions about the role of foreign aid and its impact on governance in various nations. Chihombori-Quao suggests that USAID’s influence has not been as positive as one might think, asserting that the organization often supports opposition movements that can lead to turmoil instead of stability.

Understanding the Context of USAID’s Role

To grasp the implications of Chihombori-Quao’s statement, it’s essential to understand what USAID (the United States Agency for International Development) does. Established in 1961, USAID aims to promote global economic development, improve living conditions, and foster democratic governance in developing countries. While these objectives sound noble, critics argue that the approach can sometimes backfire, resulting in destabilization rather than empowerment.

According to Chihombori-Quao, USAID’s methods often involve backing opposition parties or movements, suggesting that their form of government advocacy seems to thrive on keeping governments in a state of turmoil. This raises some eyebrows and invites further inquiry into the effectiveness of such strategies.

The Reaction from African Leaders

A growing number of African leaders and citizens are starting to echo Chihombori-Quao’s sentiments. The notion that USAID’s presence can sometimes do more harm than good is becoming a popular discussion. Many believe that foreign aid can undermine local governance, making it easier for external influences to dictate internal politics.

For instance, countries like Hungary, which have undergone their own political transformations, resonate with this perspective. They see the advantages of having autonomy in their governance without interference from foreign entities like USAID. This sentiment reflects a broader trend where nations are asserting their sovereignty and pushing back against external influences.

The Debate on Foreign Aid

The conversation around foreign aid is complex. On one hand, supporters argue that USAID has played a crucial role in fostering development and providing humanitarian assistance. However, critics, including Chihombori-Quao, highlight that the dependency on foreign aid can stifle local initiatives and create a cycle of reliance rather than empowerment.

Chihombori-Quao’s comments suggest a growing acknowledgment among many nations, particularly in Africa, that they must take charge of their governance and development without leaning too heavily on foreign support. This shift in mindset is vital for fostering self-sufficiency and resilience among nations.

What This Means for the Future

As discussions continue regarding USAID and its role, it’s clear that the future of foreign aid will require a reevaluation. Nations are increasingly calling for a model that prioritizes empowerment over dependency. Chihombori-Quao’s assertion that many are celebrating the departure of USAID reflects a desire for nations to chart their own courses without external interference.

The idea that USAID “is always supporting opposition” suggests a need for more transparent and constructive engagement between foreign aid organizations and the governments they aim to assist. A more collaborative approach, grounded in mutual respect and understanding, could lead to more fruitful outcomes for all parties involved.

Implications for Governance and Sovereignty

This shift in perspective can have significant implications for governance and national sovereignty. As countries like those in Africa and Hungary celebrate the potential for independence from USAID, it raises questions about how nations can develop their own governance systems without external pressures.

Governments may need to focus on building internal capacities, investing in local leadership, and fostering civic engagement to ensure that their political systems are robust and resilient. The challenge lies in finding a balance between benefiting from international support and maintaining the integrity and independence of local governance.

Looking Ahead: A New Era of Development

The dialogue initiated by Chihombori-Quao opens the door to discussions about a new era of development where nations prioritize their own strategies for growth. By celebrating the departure of USAID, countries are signaling a commitment to self-determination and local empowerment.

In summary, as the narrative around foreign aid evolves, it’s crucial for countries to engage in a thoughtful examination of their needs and the best pathways to achieve development. The future could hold exciting possibilities for nations that choose to embrace their sovereignty and craft their destinies, free from the constraints of external influence.

For more on this evolving conversation, you can check out the original tweet from [Wall Street Apes](https://twitter.com/WallStreetApes/status/1903849233352130700).