DARKEST FUTURE? Globalists Plan to Control Who Can Have Kids!

DARK FUTURE AHEAD? GLOBALISTS FLOAT CONTROLLING WHO CAN HAVE CHILDREN

Mark Carney’s past musings about creating “a market for the right to have children” weren’t just philosophical—they may have been a glimpse into the globalist playbook.

What if your ability to

In a provocative tweet from Jim Ferguson, the concept of a “dark future” looms large as globalist ideologies come into question. The tweet references Mark Carney’s earlier discussions about establishing a market for the right to have children, a notion that raises significant ethical and societal concerns. This summary explores the implications of such a concept, emphasizing the potential consequences on individual freedoms, family structures, and societal norms.

### Understanding the Context

Mark Carney, a prominent figure in global finance and former Governor of the Bank of England, has previously suggested the idea of a regulated market for reproductive rights. This controversial standpoint suggests that access to parenthood could be commodified, leading to a scenario where economic status determines one’s ability to have children. Ferguson’s tweet highlights the alarming nature of this idea, framing it within the larger narrative of globalist agendas aimed at controlling personal freedoms.

### The Ethical Implications

The notion of controlling who can have children opens a Pandora’s box of ethical dilemmas. If parenthood becomes a privilege tied to financial capability, it could exacerbate existing societal inequalities. Families from lower socio-economic backgrounds may find themselves marginalized, unable to afford the “rights” necessary to bear children. This scenario raises questions about the very fabric of society and its values. Are we willing to sacrifice fundamental human rights for the sake of economic control?

### Family Structures at Risk

The potential regulation of childbearing rights could lead to a redefinition of family structures. Traditional concepts of family—rooted in love, commitment, and personal choice—might be supplanted by a system that views children as commodities. This shift could have far-reaching implications on social dynamics, parenting philosophies, and the emotional well-being of future generations. The idea of ‘market-based’ parenting could lead to a lack of emotional connection and responsibility, as the emphasis shifts from nurturing relationships to transactional exchanges.

### Societal Norms and Values

Ferguson’s tweet serves as a wake-up call to the potential normalization of such extreme ideologies. If society begins to accept the commodification of parenthood, we risk losing sight of the intrinsic value of human life and the sanctity of family. The implications extend beyond individual rights; they challenge the core values that bind communities together. The acceptance of globalist frameworks could lead to a future where human dignity is compromised for the sake of economic efficiency.

### Conclusion

The discourse surrounding the control of reproductive rights is not merely a theoretical debate; it represents a critical juncture in our societal evolution. As we navigate these complex issues, it is vital to engage in thoughtful discussions about the implications of such ideologies. The potential for a market-driven approach to parenthood poses significant risks to individual freedoms, social equity, and the emotional fabric of families. In a world where globalists appear to be gaining influence over personal rights, vigilance and advocacy for ethical standards are more crucial than ever. The future of parenthood should remain a personal choice, not a privilege dictated by market forces.

In summary, Jim Ferguson’s tweet serves as a crucial reminder of the societal implications of globalist ideologies and the need for proactive discussions about the values we wish to uphold in our communities.

DARK FUTURE AHEAD? GLOBALISTS FLOAT CONTROLLING WHO CAN HAVE CHILDREN

Mark Carney’s past musings about creating “a market for the right to have children” weren’t just philosophical—they may have been a glimpse into the globalist playbook.

What if your ability to… pic.twitter.com/MX9W9lx1cH

— Jim Ferguson (@JimFergusonUK) March 22, 2025

DARK FUTURE AHEAD? GLOBALISTS FLOAT CONTROLLING WHO CAN HAVE CHILDREN

Imagine a world where your ability to have children is not just a personal decision but a commodity regulated by those in power. This isn’t just science fiction; it’s a topic gaining traction in discussions among globalists. Recently, Jim Ferguson highlighted the chilling thoughts of Mark Carney, who once proposed the idea of creating “a market for the right to have children.” If you think this is merely a philosophical debate, think again—it could be a glimpse into a far more dystopian future.

Mark Carney’s Vision: A Market for a Fundamental Right

Mark Carney’s musings about the concept of a market for the right to have children have raised eyebrows and sparked heated debates. The notion that something as personal and fundamental as parenthood could be commoditized is unsettling, to say the least. Carney, a former governor of the Bank of England and a prominent figure in global finance, suggests that demographic changes and resource constraints might necessitate such drastic measures.

This concept leads us to wonder: Who gets to decide who can have children? What criteria would be used? Would it be based on financial status, genetic health, or some other arbitrary measure? These questions are not just theoretical—they touch on deep ethical considerations that could redefine humanity itself. You can dive deeper into Carney’s ideas by checking out [this article](https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/sep/06/would-you-pay-for-the-right-to-have-children).

What If Your Ability to Have Children Was Controlled?

The implications of controlling who can have children are massive. Imagine a world where the government or a corporate entity has the final say on your reproductive choices. This scenario might sound extreme, but it’s not entirely out of the realm of possibility. With current trends in surveillance and data collection, the technology to monitor and control such aspects of life is becoming increasingly sophisticated.

Consider this: if a market for having children were to exist, it could lead to a stark divide between the wealthy and the underprivileged. Only those who can afford to “purchase” the right to procreate would be able to have children, leading to a society where lineage and genetics are manipulated for the sake of profit and control.

This kind of world raises profound ethical dilemmas. Would society be okay with such a system, or would it spark widespread outrage? The conversation around reproductive rights is already fraught with tension, and adding a financial element could exacerbate these issues. For more insights into the ethical implications of reproductive technologies, check out this [report from the World Health Organization](https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/reproductive-health).

Understanding the Globalist Agenda

The term “globalist” often comes with a lot of baggage. It conjures images of shadowy elites pulling the strings behind the scenes, shaping policies that impact everyday lives. While some may dismiss this as conspiracy theory, the reality is that discussions around population control and reproductive rights are happening at high levels.

These ideas are not just academic or abstract; they reflect a growing concern about how global challenges, like climate change and resource scarcity, might push governments and organizations to consider extreme measures. As we face a future with a growing population and dwindling resources, the question arises: will we prioritize individual freedoms, or will we succumb to a more collectivist approach that sacrifices personal rights for the supposed greater good?

The Ethical Landscape of Reproductive Rights

As we explore the notion of controlling who can have children, we must confront the ethical landscape surrounding reproductive rights. What does it mean to have autonomy over one’s body and family planning? The right to have children is often seen as a fundamental human right, enshrined in various international agreements. However, the suggestion of a market for this right challenges these assumptions.

When we start placing a price on something as deeply personal as parenthood, we open the door to exploitation. People may feel pressured to make choices based on economic circumstances rather than personal desires. This could lead to a devaluation of the family unit, where relationships are dictated by financial capabilities rather than love and commitment.

Preparing for the Future: A Call to Action

In light of these discussions, it’s crucial for individuals to engage in conversations about reproductive rights and the implications of commodifying parenthood. As citizens, we must be vigilant about the policies being proposed and the motivations behind them. The future of our reproductive rights could very well depend on the actions we take today.

Join local advocacy groups, participate in discussions, and educate yourself and others about these issues. Understanding the potential ramifications of a market for the right to have children is vital in ensuring that personal freedoms are protected and that ethical standards are upheld.

In conclusion, the idea that globalists may attempt to control who can have children is chilling. It underscores the importance of remaining informed and engaged in the conversation. The future of our society hinges on our willingness to challenge these narratives and stand up for our rights.

For a more in-depth look at the implications of these discussions, you can check out [this insightful article](https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2022/01/05/what-if-our-ability-to-have-children-was-regulated/?sh=4d3e80c37d8c), which delves deeper into the ethical and social considerations surrounding reproductive technology and rights.