Trump’s Next Big Move: Pardon Snowden & Assange After Heroic Jan 6 Pardons!
.
After his heroic pardons of the Jan 6thers and Ross, President Trump should pardon Snowden and Assange next! Let’s really shake things up and let the corrupt establishment know that their time is over!
—————–
In a recent tweet, comedian Dave Smith expressed a bold opinion regarding former President Donald Trump’s potential pardons. Following Trump’s controversial pardons of individuals involved in the January 6th Capitol riots and whistleblower Ross Ulbricht, Smith suggested that Trump should extend similar clemency to Edward Snowden and Julian Assange. This call for action is resonating with a segment of the population looking to challenge the status quo and confront what they perceive as a corrupt establishment.
### The Context of Trump’s Previous Pardons
Trump’s decision to grant pardons has often sparked intense debate. The pardons of those involved in the January 6 insurrection were particularly polarizing, igniting discussions about accountability and justice. Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the Silk Road marketplace, was convicted for his role in facilitating illegal drug transactions online. By pardoning these individuals, Trump positioned himself as a champion of those he believes have been wronged by the system. This context sets the stage for Smith’s proposal regarding Snowden and Assange.
### Who Are Edward Snowden and Julian Assange?
Edward Snowden is a former National Security Agency contractor who leaked classified information about government surveillance programs, which sparked global discussions about privacy rights and governmental overreach. Snowden has been living in exile in Russia since 2013, facing charges in the United States for espionage and theft of government property.
Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has been a controversial figure for releasing classified documents that exposed government and military misconduct. He has been imprisoned in the UK while fighting extradition to the U.S., where he faces multiple charges including conspiracy to commit computer intrusion.
### The Implications of Pardoning Snowden and Assange
Smith’s suggestion to pardon Snowden and Assange aligns with the sentiments of many who believe that these two figures have been unjustly punished for their actions, which they argue were in the public interest. A pardon would not only liberate Snowden and Assange but could also serve as a significant political statement, challenging the existing narrative about whistleblowers and transparency.
### Public Reaction and Political Ramifications
The idea of pardoning Snowden and Assange could further polarize public opinion. Supporters argue that such pardons would affirm the importance of free speech and the necessity of holding governments accountable. Conversely, opponents might view these actions as undermining national security or endorsing illegal activities.
Smith’s tweet illustrates a wider discontent with established political norms, suggesting that the time for change is ripe. By advocating for these pardons, he taps into a growing frustration with perceived injustices within the judicial system and the political establishment.
### Conclusion: A Call for Change
Dave Smith’s tweet calling for President Trump to pardon Snowden and Assange resonates with a broader movement seeking to challenge the entrenched power structures in Washington. As discussions around transparency, accountability, and civil liberties continue to evolve, the prospect of such pardons could serve as a litmus test for the future of political reform. Whether or not Trump will act on this suggestion remains to be seen, but the conversation it has sparked is undoubtedly significant in the ongoing discourse about justice and governance in America.
After his heroic pardons of the Jan 6thers and Ross, President Trump should pardon Snowden and Assange next!
Let’s really shake things up and let the corrupt establishment know that their time is over!
— Dave Smith (@ComicDaveSmith) January 22, 2025
After his heroic pardons of the Jan 6thers and Ross, President Trump should pardon Snowden and Assange next!
When we talk about presidential pardons, it’s hard not to think about the implications they carry for justice, politics, and the individuals involved. Recently, comedian and commentator Dave Smith made waves on Twitter, suggesting that after President Trump’s “heroic pardons” of the January 6th defendants and Ross Ulbricht, he should consider pardoning whistleblowers Edward Snowden and Julian Assange. This idea isn’t just a passing thought; it has the potential to shake up the political landscape and challenge the status quo.
Snowden and Assange are two names that have been at the center of intense debates about privacy, government transparency, and the freedom of the press. Snowden, a former NSA contractor, leaked classified information in 2013 that revealed the extent of government surveillance on ordinary citizens. Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has faced prosecution for publishing classified documents that exposed government misconduct. Both men have their supporters and detractors, but one thing is clear: their situations raise questions about the balance between national security and individual rights.
Let’s really shake things up and let the corrupt establishment know that their time is over!
Dave Smith’s tweet hints at a broader sentiment among many Americans: a desire for change and accountability from the political elite. By pardoning Snowden and Assange, Trump would send a strong message to the establishment that the old ways of operating—where whistleblowers are punished and critical voices are silenced—are no longer acceptable. This is especially relevant in a time when trust in government institutions is waning.
The potential pardons could also ignite conversations about the role of whistleblowers in democracy. Whistleblowing is often seen as a patriotic act, aimed at exposing wrongdoings and protecting the public interest. However, the legal repercussions for such actions can be severe. By granting pardons, Trump could help redefine the narrative around whistleblowing, acknowledging it as a brave endeavor rather than a criminal act.
But what would it mean for Trump to take this step? For one, it could solidify his base, particularly among libertarians and those who value civil liberties. It would also align with his often anti-establishment rhetoric, positioning him as a champion of the people against a corrupt system. This move could even spark a larger movement advocating for the rights of whistleblowers and journalists, reshaping future policies and attitudes toward transparency.
As we consider the implications of these potential pardons, it’s important to look at the legal and ethical dimensions as well. Many argue that Snowden and Assange should face consequences for their actions, citing national security concerns. However, others believe that the public has a right to know about government overreach and misconduct. The debate is complex, and it’s crucial to weigh both sides fairly.
In the context of the current political climate, a pardon could also serve as a catalyst for broader discussions about the limits of government power. As technology evolves, so too do the methods of surveillance and control that governments can exert over their citizens. The revelations brought to light by Snowden and Assange are more relevant than ever, especially as concerns about privacy and data security continue to grow.
Furthermore, the international implications of pardoning Assange cannot be overlooked. Assange has been embroiled in legal battles in the UK and the US, facing extradition that many believe is politically motivated. By pardoning him, Trump could potentially ease tensions between the US and other nations that view Assange as a symbol of press freedom. This could open doors for dialogue about the treatment of journalists and the importance of protecting those who seek to expose the truth.
In the end, the idea of pardoning Snowden and Assange is about much more than just two individuals. It’s about the values we hold as a society and the lengths we’re willing to go to protect them. It’s about questioning the narratives pushed by the establishment and advocating for a system that prioritizes transparency and accountability.
So, what do you think? Would pardoning Snowden and Assange really shake things up? It’s a provocative question that deserves our attention and consideration. As the political landscape continues to evolve, these conversations will shape the future of our democracy and the rights we hold dear.
In the spirit of open dialogue, let’s keep the conversation going. Whether you agree or disagree with the idea of pardoning these controversial figures, it’s essential to engage in discussions that challenge our perspectives and push for a better understanding of the issues at hand. After all, in a democracy, it’s our responsibility to question the status quo and advocate for the values we believe in.