Biden’s Unhinged Rant: 28th Amendment Declared Law NOW!
Unconstitutional Move or Equal Rights Triumph?
.
BREAKING: President Biden goes on unhinged, tyrannical rant and unilaterally, unconstitutionally declares the 28th Amendment in effect "NOW." "The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land NOW. It is the 28th Amendment to the Constitution NOW." FACT CHECK: This is NOT https://t.co/0fYmL3hh16
—————–
On January 17, 2025, Eric Daugherty’s tweet ignited significant controversy by claiming that President Biden had made an unprecedented declaration regarding the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The tweet alleged that Biden had unilaterally declared the ERA as the 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, stating, “The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land NOW.” This assertion was described as “unhinged” and “tyrannical,” raising questions about the constitutional validity of such a declaration.
The Equal Rights Amendment, originally proposed in 1923 and passed by Congress in 1972, aims to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens regardless of sex. Despite its historical significance, the ERA has faced numerous challenges in its ratification process. As of now, while 38 states have ratified the amendment, there are ongoing debates about its legal status and whether it can be added to the Constitution without further congressional action.
Daugherty’s tweet, which received attention for its dramatic tone, prompted discussions about the implications of Biden’s supposed announcement. Critics of the administration seized on this moment to question the president’s commitment to constitutional principles and the potential overreach of executive power. They argued that such a unilateral move could set a dangerous precedent for future administrations, undermining the checks and balances that are foundational to the American political system.
In contrast, proponents of the ERA celebrated the tweet as a sign of progress towards gender equality. They argue that the amendment is long overdue and that its implementation would solidify protections against gender discrimination in various aspects of life, including employment, education, and healthcare. Supporters believe that by declaring the ERA as the 28th Amendment, Biden would be taking a necessary step to rectify historical injustices faced by women and marginalized groups in the U.S.
However, it’s important to note that the claim made in Daugherty’s tweet was quickly met with pushback from legal experts and political analysts. Many emphasized that such a declaration cannot be made unilaterally by the president, as constitutional amendments require a rigorous process that includes both congressional approval and state ratification. This process is designed to ensure that amendments reflect a broad consensus within the nation, preserving the integrity of the Constitution.
As discussions around the Equal Rights Amendment continue, the need for clarity regarding its status becomes increasingly urgent. The debates surrounding the ERA highlight broader societal issues related to gender equality, civil rights, and the role of government in enacting meaningful change. The outcome of these discussions could have lasting implications for American society, influencing future generations’ understanding of gender rights and legal protections.
In conclusion, the tweet by Eric Daugherty reflects the heightened tensions surrounding the Equal Rights Amendment and President Biden’s approach to gender equality. Whether viewed as a tyrannical overreach or a hopeful declaration of rights, the conversation surrounding the ERA is likely to persist as advocates and opponents alike grapple with its potential impact on American law and society. The discourse emphasizes the importance of upholding constitutional processes while striving for equality and justice in the nation.
BREAKING: President Biden goes on unhinged, tyrannical rant and unilaterally, unconstitutionally declares the 28th Amendment in effect “NOW.”
“The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land NOW. It is the 28th Amendment to the Constitution NOW.”
FACT CHECK: This is NOT… pic.twitter.com/0fYmL3hh16
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 17, 2025
BREAKING: President Biden goes on unhinged, tyrannical rant and unilaterally, unconstitutionally declares the 28th Amendment in effect “NOW.”
On January 17, 2025, a tweet sent shockwaves through social media, claiming that President Biden had declared the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to be the 28th Amendment to the Constitution, asserting its immediate implementation. The tweet described Biden’s announcement as an “unhinged, tyrannical rant,” igniting a fierce debate about presidential power and constitutional authority. Such a declaration raises significant questions about the process of amending the Constitution and the implications of unilateral action by a sitting president.
“The Equal Rights Amendment is the law of the land NOW. It is the 28th Amendment to the Constitution NOW.”
To understand the weight of this statement, let’s delve into what the Equal Rights Amendment entails. Originally proposed in 1923 and passed by Congress in 1972, the ERA aims to guarantee equal legal rights for all American citizens, regardless of sex. It seeks to end the legal distinctions between men and women in matters of divorce, property, employment, and other issues. Despite its historical significance, the amendment fell short of ratification by the required number of states before the deadline set by Congress.
The controversy surrounding Biden’s declaration centers on the legitimacy of such a move. The Constitution itself outlines a specific process for amendments, which requires approval by two-thirds of both Houses of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures. Critics argue that declaring the ERA as the 28th Amendment without following this process undermines the foundational principles of democracy and the rule of law. For more on the amendment process, check out this detailed explanation from the National Archives.
FACT CHECK: This is NOT…
As with any explosive claim, fact-checking is crucial. Various fact-checking organizations quickly sprang into action to verify the legitimacy of Biden’s announcement. The consensus was that there had been no official declaration from the White House announcing the ERA as the 28th Amendment. For instance, PolitiFact confirmed that no legal basis exists for such a claim, emphasizing that the amendment process is firmly embedded in the Constitution and cannot be bypassed by presidential decree.
This situation raises broader questions about the role of social media in shaping public perception and spreading misinformation. In an era where tweets can go viral in seconds, the potential for misunderstanding and misrepresentation is significant. It’s essential for citizens to scrutinize such claims and consult reliable sources to understand the truth behind political declarations.
The Implications of Unilateral Action
What if a president could declare amendments at will? The ramifications would be profound. Such a move could erode the checks and balances designed to protect against abuse of power. The Constitution was crafted to ensure that no single branch of government could wield unchecked authority. Allowing a president to unilaterally declare amendments could set a dangerous precedent, leading to a slippery slope of executive overreach.
Moreover, it could spark a constitutional crisis. Imagine if other presidents followed suit, declaring various policies or amendments without legislative approval. The legislative branch would become a mere formality, and the essence of democratic governance would be compromised. The integrity of the Constitution relies on a collective agreement among the branches of government and the states, which is why the amendment process is so rigorous.
Public Reaction and Political Ramifications
The immediate public reaction to Biden’s alleged declaration was a mix of outrage and confusion. Supporters of the ERA celebrated the idea of progress toward equality, while opponents viewed it as a blatant overreach of power. Political pundits filled the airwaves with analysis, each side interpreting the event through their ideological lens. The divisive nature of American politics means that discussions about the ERA and its potential ratification are often charged with emotion and strong opinions.
In the wake of this incident, many are asking what the future holds for the Equal Rights Amendment. Will it ever be ratified, or is it destined to be a historical footnote? Activists continue to push for its inclusion in the Constitution, arguing that gender equality is fundamental to American democracy. However, the path forward remains fraught with challenges, especially in a polarized political environment.
Conclusion: Navigating Misinformation and Constitutional Integrity
The incident surrounding President Biden’s supposed declaration of the ERA as the 28th Amendment serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking in the age of information overload. As citizens, we must remain vigilant, fact-checking claims and turning to reputable sources for clarity. The Constitution is a living document, and its amendments must reflect the collective will of the people, not the whims of a single individual.
In this era of rapid information exchange, understanding the processes behind significant political changes is crucial. Whether you’re an advocate for the Equal Rights Amendment or a concerned citizen monitoring government actions, staying informed is your best tool for engaging in meaningful dialogues about the future of American democracy.