The Supreme Court has declined an urgent hearing of a petition seeking to file an FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin for his comments on Sanatana Dharma. The petitioners compared the situation to what would happen if someone from BJP made similar remarks about Islam or Christianity.
BIG BREAKING NEWS:
Miyalords & Gaylords of Supreme Court decline urgent hearing of a petition filed seeking to file an FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin for his comments on Sanatana Dharma.
Imagine if someone from BJP had said something similar against Islam or Christianity…
— MJ (@MJ_007Club) September 15, 2023
In a surprising turn of events, the Miyalords and Gaylords of the Supreme Court have declined an urgent hearing of a petition seeking to file a First Information Report (FIR) against Udhayanidhi Stalin, a prominent political figure, for his controversial comments on Sanatana Dharma. The decision has sparked widespread debate and raised questions about the impartiality and fairness of the judicial system.
The petition, filed by an unidentified individual, alleged that Stalin’s comments were offensive and derogatory towards the Hindu religion. It argued that if a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had made similar remarks against Islam or Christianity, there would have been swift action taken.
Stalin, the son of the late M. Karunanidhi and a member of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party, made the comments during a public speech. While the exact nature of his remarks remains undisclosed, they have evidently stirred controversy and drawn the attention of social media users.
Critics argue that the Supreme Court’s decision not to grant an urgent hearing to the petition reflects a bias in favor of the ruling party. They claim that had the situation been reversed, and a BJP member faced similar accusations, the court’s response would have been different.
As the news spreads, it has ignited a larger conversation about freedom of speech, religious tolerance, and the role of the judiciary in protecting citizens’ sentiments. People from both sides of the political spectrum are closely watching this development, as it could set a precedent for future cases involving political figures and their statements..
BIG BREAKING NEWS:
Miyalords & Gaylords of Supreme Court decline urgent hearing of a petition filed seeking to file an FIR against Udhayanidhi Stalin for his comments on Sanatana Dharma.
Imagine if someone from BJP had said something similar against Islam or Christianity…
— MJ (@MJ_007Club) September 15, 2023