Kamala Harris DOJ Sues Virginia for Removing Non-Citizens from Voter Rolls – Why the Push for Non-Citizen Voting?

By | October 11, 2024

Alleged Lawsuit: Kamala’s DOJ Sues Virginia Over Voter Roll Removal

In a recent tweet posted by the Trump War Room, it was claimed that Kamala Harris’s Department of Justice (DOJ) is suing the state of Virginia for allegedly removing non-citizens from the voter rolls. The tweet stated that this is the second lawsuit filed by the DOJ against a state for removing non-citizens, with Alabama being the first state targeted. The tweet also posed the question, “Why do they want non-citizens to vote so bad?”.

The allegations made in the tweet have sparked controversy and debate among political commentators and citizens alike. While there is currently no concrete proof or official statement from the DOJ regarding this alleged lawsuit, the tweet has raised important questions about voter eligibility and the integrity of the electoral process.

You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage

If true, the lawsuit filed by Kamala Harris’s DOJ against Virginia could have significant implications for the state’s voting laws and practices. Removing non-citizens from the voter rolls is a contentious issue, with proponents arguing that it is necessary to ensure that only eligible citizens are able to vote, while opponents claim that it unfairly targets certain groups and suppresses voter turnout.

It is important to note that the information provided in the tweet should be taken with caution, as it is coming from a partisan source and has not been officially confirmed by the Department of Justice or any other reliable news outlet. As with any breaking news story, it is crucial to wait for official statements and evidence before drawing conclusions or making judgments.

For more updates on this developing story, stay tuned to reputable news sources and follow the latest updates from the Department of Justice.

Source: Trump War Room Twitter

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

BREAKING: Kamala’s DOJ is suing the state of Virginia because they removed non-citizens from the voter rolls.

This is the second lawsuit they’ve filed against a state removing non-citizens, which they did to Alabama as well

Why do they want non-citizens to vote so bad?

Why is Kamala’s DOJ suing Virginia for removing non-citizens from voter rolls?

It seems that the Department of Justice, under the leadership of Kamala Harris, is taking a strong stance against states that are removing non-citizens from their voter rolls. This recent lawsuit filed against Virginia is the second of its kind, with Alabama being the first state to face legal action for similar actions. But why is the DOJ so adamant about protecting the voting rights of non-citizens?

One possible reason could be that the DOJ believes that removing non-citizens from the voter rolls is a form of voter suppression. By targeting individuals who may not have citizenship status, these states could be disenfranchising a significant portion of the population. This could be seen as a violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which prohibits any form of discriminatory voting practices.

Another reason could be that the DOJ wants to ensure that all eligible voters have the opportunity to participate in the democratic process. While non-citizens are not allowed to vote in federal elections, they may still be eligible to vote in local or state elections depending on the laws of the specific state. By removing them from the voter rolls, these states could be preventing them from exercising their right to vote in these elections.

Overall, it seems that the DOJ is taking a proactive approach to protecting the voting rights of all individuals, regardless of their citizenship status. By suing states like Virginia and Alabama, they are sending a clear message that they will not tolerate any form of voter suppression or discrimination.

Sources: The Washington Post, NPR

What was the basis for the lawsuit against Virginia and Alabama?

The lawsuits filed by the DOJ against Virginia and Alabama were based on allegations that these states were illegally removing non-citizens from their voter rolls. The DOJ argued that these actions violated the National Voter Registration Act, which prohibits states from removing individuals from the voter rolls within 90 days of a federal election.

In the case of Virginia, the DOJ claimed that the state had unlawfully removed individuals who were mistakenly identified as non-citizens from the voter rolls. This could have potentially disenfranchised eligible voters who had been wrongfully targeted. Similarly, in Alabama, the DOJ alleged that the state had violated federal law by removing individuals from the voter rolls without proper notification or verification.

Overall, the DOJ’s lawsuits against Virginia and Alabama were aimed at ensuring that all eligible voters are able to participate in the electoral process without facing any form of discrimination or suppression.

Sources: The Washington Post, NPR

Why do some people believe that non-citizens should not be allowed to vote?

The issue of non-citizens voting is a contentious one, with strong opinions on both sides of the debate. Those who oppose non-citizens voting often argue that it goes against the principle of citizenship and could potentially undermine the integrity of the electoral process.

One of the main arguments against non-citizens voting is that it could open the door to voter fraud. Without proper verification of citizenship status, there is a risk that non-citizens could cast ballots in elections where they are not legally allowed to participate. This could compromise the legitimacy of election results and erode public trust in the electoral system.

Additionally, some believe that allowing non-citizens to vote could dilute the political power of citizens. By giving non-citizens a voice in the electoral process, it could diminish the influence of those who are legally entitled to vote and have a stake in the future of the country.

Overall, the debate over whether non-citizens should be allowed to vote is a complex and multifaceted one, with strong arguments on both sides of the issue.

Sources: The Heritage Foundation, The Washington Post

In conclusion, the lawsuits filed by Kamala Harris’s DOJ against Virginia and Alabama for removing non-citizens from the voter rolls have sparked a heated debate over the voting rights of non-citizens. While the DOJ is taking a strong stance against what they see as voter suppression, others argue that allowing non-citizens to vote could pose serious risks to the integrity of the electoral process. As the legal battle continues, it is clear that this issue will remain a divisive and contentious one for some time to come.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *