Supreme Court Debunks “151 mg Semen” Theory in Kolkata RG Kar Hospital Rape and Murder Case

In a recent development in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case, the Supreme Court has debunked the controversial “151 mg semen” theory that was presented in court. The Chief Justice of India (CJI) reprimanded a lawyer for using social media arguments in court and emphasized the importance of relying on concrete evidence.

The case, which has shocked the nation, involved the rape and murder of a victim whose body was found with 151 mg of semen. The lawyer representing the accused had cited this as evidence of innocence, claiming that the amount of semen found was too low to prove guilt. However, the CJI was quick to dismiss this argument, stating that social media speculation has no place in the courtroom.

“We have the post mortem report before us,” the CJI stated firmly. “We cannot rely on hearsay and unsubstantiated claims. It is imperative that we base our decisions on factual evidence.” This statement highlights the importance of upholding the principles of justice and ensuring that the rule of law prevails.

The debunking of the “151 mg semen” theory serves as a reminder of the dangers of relying on misinformation and unverified claims. In a world where fake news and false narratives can easily spread, it is crucial for the judiciary to uphold the integrity of the legal system and make decisions based on facts and evidence.

The tragic incident at the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital has sparked outrage and calls for justice. The victim, whose life was cut short in a horrific manner, deserves to have her case handled with the utmost care and diligence. It is essential for the legal system to ensure that the guilty are held accountable and that justice is served.

As the case continues to unfold, it is important for the public to remain vigilant and demand transparency and accountability from the authorities. The Supreme Court’s decision to debunk the “151 mg semen” theory is a step in the right direction towards ensuring a fair and just legal process.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s debunking of the controversial theory in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the principles of justice and relying on factual evidence. It is essential for the legal system to remain impartial and objective in order to ensure that justice is served and the rights of the victim are upheld. Let us hope that this case will set a precedent for future cases and that justice will prevail.

BREAKING: Supreme Court debunks the “151 mg semen” theory in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case. “Don’t use social media arguments in court” CJI raps lawyer who said that 151 mg of semen was found in the victim’s body. “We have the post mortem report before us. We… pic.twitter.com/Rk2jt2WukO

— Law Today (@LawTodayLive) August 22, 2024

In a recent court case that has shocked the nation, the Supreme Court has debunked the controversial "151 mg semen" theory that was presented in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case. This groundbreaking decision comes after Chief Justice of India (CJI) reprimanded a lawyer for using social media arguments in court and making baseless claims about the amount of semen found in the victim’s body.

What led to this shocking revelation in the courtroom? Let’s delve deeper into the details of this case and explore the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

Who raised the "151 mg semen" theory in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case?

The lawyer representing the accused in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case was the one who raised the controversial "151 mg semen" theory during the court proceedings. The lawyer claimed that this evidence was found in the victim’s body, leading to speculations about the nature of the crime.

What was the response of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) to the lawyer’s claim?

Chief Justice of India (CJI) was quick to dismiss the lawyer’s claim and rebuke him for relying on social media arguments in the courtroom. CJI emphasized that the court had access to the post-mortem report, which did not support the lawyer’s assertion about the amount of semen found in the victim’s body. This highlights the importance of relying on factual evidence in legal proceedings rather than hearsay or unverified claims.

How did the Supreme Court debunk the "151 mg semen" theory in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case?

The Supreme Court debunked the controversial "151 mg semen" theory by pointing out the lack of evidence to support this claim. The post-mortem report, which is a crucial piece of evidence in any criminal investigation, did not mention anything about the specific amount of semen found in the victim’s body. This underscores the significance of relying on official documents and expert opinions in legal proceedings to ensure a fair and just outcome.

What are the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case?

The Supreme Court’s ruling in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case has far-reaching implications for the Indian legal system. It serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served based on concrete evidence rather than unfounded claims. This decision also highlights the need for lawyers to conduct thorough investigations and present credible evidence in court to support their arguments.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s debunking of the "151 mg semen" theory in the Kolkata RG Kar Hospital rape and murder case is a significant development in the ongoing legal proceedings. It underscores the importance of relying on factual evidence and expert opinions in courtrooms to ensure a fair and just outcome for all parties involved. This case serves as a reminder of the critical role that evidence plays in the administration of justice and the need for legal professionals to adhere to the highest standards of integrity and professionalism in their practice.

Sources:

• Supreme Court debunks "151 mg semen" theory in Kolkata rape case
• CJI raps lawyer for using social media arguments in court