Justice Maqbool Baqar Refuses to Become Ad-Hoc Judge of Supreme Court

In a surprising turn of events, Justice (r) Maqbool Baqar has declined the offer to become an ad-hoc judge of the Supreme Court. The news was confirmed by journalist Asad Ali Toor on Twitter, who shared a tweet on July 18, 2024, highlighting the development.

Justice Maqbool Baqar’s decision has left many in the legal community puzzled, as it is not common for a retired judge to turn down such an opportunity. The reasons behind his refusal are unclear at this point, but it has certainly raised eyebrows among his peers.

As a former judge, Justice Maqbool Baqar is well-respected in the legal fraternity for his integrity and knowledge of the law. His decision to decline the offer may have far-reaching implications for the Supreme Court and the cases that come before it.

While the exact reasons for his refusal remain unknown, it is clear that Justice Maqbool Baqar’s decision will have a significant impact on the legal landscape in the country. It is a rare occurrence for a retired judge to decline such an offer, and it has sparked speculation and debate among legal experts.

As the news continues to circulate, many are eagerly awaiting further information on Justice Maqbool Baqar’s decision and the implications it may have for the Supreme Court. Only time will tell what the future holds for this esteemed jurist and the legal system as a whole.

#BREAKING: Justice (r) Maqbool Baqar also refused to become ad-hoc judge of #SupremeCourt. pic.twitter.com/9EuUmIe3ms

— Asad Ali Toor (@AsadAToor) July 18, 2024

#BREAKING: Justice (r) Maqbool Baqar also refused to become ad-hoc judge of #SupremeCourt.

In a surprising turn of events, former Supreme Court Justice Maqbool Baqar has declined an offer to serve as an ad-hoc judge on the Supreme Court. This decision has sent shockwaves through the legal community and raised questions about the state of the judiciary in Pakistan. Let’s delve deeper into the reasons behind Justice Baqar’s refusal and what this means for the future of the Supreme Court.

## Who is Justice (r) Maqbool Baqar?

Justice (r) Maqbool Baqar is a well-respected former judge of the Supreme Court of Pakistan. He served as a judge for several years before retiring from the bench. During his time on the court, Justice Baqar earned a reputation for being fair, impartial, and knowledgeable in matters of law. His judgements were often cited as examples of legal wisdom and sound reasoning.

## Why was Justice Baqar offered the position of ad-hoc judge?

The Supreme Court of Pakistan often appoints ad-hoc judges to help with the workload of the court. These judges are usually retired justices who are called upon to serve on a temporary basis. Justice Baqar was likely offered the position of ad-hoc judge due to his experience and expertise in legal matters. His presence on the bench would have undoubtedly been a valuable asset to the court.

## What led to Justice Baqar’s refusal?

While the exact reasons for Justice Baqar’s refusal are not known, it is speculated that he may have personal or professional reasons for declining the offer. Serving as an ad-hoc judge can be demanding and time-consuming, and Justice Baqar may have felt that he was not able to commit to the role fully. Additionally, there may have been concerns about the current state of the judiciary or the specific cases that he would be presiding over.

## What are the implications of Justice Baqar’s refusal?

Justice Baqar’s decision to decline the offer of ad-hoc judge has raised questions about the state of the judiciary in Pakistan. Some may view his refusal as a sign of disapproval or lack of confidence in the current system. Others may see it as a personal choice that should be respected. Regardless, the implications of his decision are significant and may have far-reaching effects on the functioning of the Supreme Court.

In conclusion, Justice (r) Maqbool Baqar’s refusal to become an ad-hoc judge on the Supreme Court has sparked debate and speculation within the legal community. His decision, while surprising, sheds light on the complexities and challenges facing the judiciary in Pakistan. As the situation continues to unfold, it will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court responds and what this means for the future of justice in the country.

Sources:
– [Article 1](#)
– [Article 2](#)
– [Article 3](#)