death – obituary– Cause of Death News : to the deceased individual.
In a stunning turn of events on Capitol Hill, House Republicans have reportedly mustered enough support to charge Attorney General Merrick Garland with inherent contempt of Congress. The news was revealed by Rep. Ralph Norman, a Republican member of the House Judiciary Committee. This move marks a significant escalation in tensions between the legislative and executive branches of the government.
Inherent contempt of Congress is a rarely used power that allows Congress to detain and even imprison individuals who refuse to comply with subpoenas or otherwise obstruct congressional investigations. The last time inherent contempt was used was in 1935 when Congress detained William MacCracken Jr., a former assistant attorney general, for refusing to testify before a House committee.
The decision to charge Attorney General Garland with inherent contempt comes after weeks of mounting frustration among House Republicans over what they see as the Department of Justice’s lack of cooperation with congressional inquiries. Republicans have accused Garland of stonewalling their attempts to obtain documents and information related to a variety of issues, including the DOJ’s handling of election fraud investigations and its response to protests and riots in various cities.
Rep. Norman’s announcement has sent shockwaves through Washington, with many lawmakers and political observers expressing surprise at the bold move by House Republicans. The decision to charge a sitting attorney general with inherent contempt is unprecedented and could have far-reaching implications for the relationship between Congress and the executive branch.
It remains to be seen how Democrats will respond to the news of the impending charges against Attorney General Garland. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not yet commented on the matter, but it is likely that Democrats will push back against the move, arguing that it is politically motivated and an abuse of congressional power.
Meanwhile, supporters of the charges against Garland argue that it is necessary to hold the attorney general accountable for what they see as his refusal to cooperate with legitimate congressional oversight. They believe that the use of inherent contempt is a necessary tool to ensure that the executive branch does not overstep its bounds and obstruct the work of Congress.
As the news continues to unfold, many are left wondering what the next steps will be in the unfolding drama on Capitol Hill. If the charges against Attorney General Garland proceed, it could lead to a protracted legal battle that could have significant implications for the balance of power between the branches of government.
In the midst of this uncertainty, one thing is clear: the tensions between Congress and the executive branch are at an all-time high. The decision to charge Attorney General Garland with inherent contempt is just the latest chapter in what has become a contentious and highly polarized political landscape. Only time will tell what the ultimate outcome of this saga will be.