By Trend News Line 2024-06-28 06:01:17.
through a basement window. But there was no window in the basement of the Picus-Gayle home. + Asaro claimed that Williams told her he took a laptop computer from the house. But the computer taken from the Picus-Gayle home was an Apple laptop, not a generic laptop as Asaro initially stated. + Asaro said Williams told her he broke into the house while a shower was running. But Dr. Picus testified that he always turned off the water before leaving the house. + Asaro told the police that Williams said he entered the house through a window. But no windows were broken or tampered with at the crime scene. + Asaro initially claimed that Williams told her he wore gloves during the break-in and murder. But no gloves were found at the crime scene. The murder weapon, Gayle’s kitchen knife, was left behind at the scene with Williams’ DNA on it. But the DNA on the knife wasn’t Williams’. In fact, DNA testing excluded Williams as a contributor to the genetic material found on the murder weapon. Despite this, the jury found Williams guilty of first-degree murder and sentenced him to death. The evidence against him was circumstantial and contradictory. There was no physical evidence linking him to the crime. The two key witnesses against him were unreliable and had ulterior motives. Williams has maintained his innocence from the beginning, and his defense team has continued to fight for his freedom. In 2015, the Missouri Supreme Court granted Williams a stay of execution just hours before he was scheduled to die by lethal injection. The court ordered new DNA testing on the murder weapon, which excluded Williams as a contributor to the DNA found on the knife. The results of the new DNA testing were never presented at trial. Williams’ defense team has filed numerous appeals and petitions for post-conviction relief, all of which have been denied. Now, with an execution date looming, the case of Marcellus Williams has garnered national attention. Advocates for his release argue that he is innocent and that the evidence against him is weak and unreliable. They are calling on Missouri Governor Mike Parson to grant Williams clemency and spare his life. The case of Marcellus Williams is a stark reminder of the flaws in the criminal justice system and the potential for wrongful convictions. As the September 24 execution date approaches, the fate of Marcellus Williams hangs in the balance. Will justice prevail, or will an innocent man be put to death for a crime he did not commit? Only time will tell..
– Innocence railroading Marcellus Williams death row
– End innocence Marcellus Williams death row.