Failed fact-checking: 3 journalists spread misinformation on Michael Cohen investigation.

In a recent turn of events, a prime example of failed fact-checking has surfaced involving not one, not two, but three different journalists. This incident sheds light on the importance of thorough research and verification in journalism, as well as the consequences of spreading misinformation.

The investigation into Michael Cohen, a former lawyer for ex-President Donald Trump, has been a topic of much speculation and scrutiny. However, it appears that some journalists involved in reporting on this case have fallen short in their fact-checking efforts.

According to a tweet by user emptywheel, also known as “foil,” the origin of the investigation into Michael Cohen is not as mysterious as some may have thought. In fact, the warrants related to this case have been unsealed, thanks in part to a media coalition that includes the New York Times. The investigation stemmed from a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) based on large financial transactions.

This revelation calls into question the accuracy of previous reporting on the Michael Cohen case. It serves as a stark reminder of the importance of verifying information before presenting it to the public. In the age of social media and instant news updates, it is crucial for journalists to uphold the highest standards of integrity and accuracy.

The implications of this failed fact-checking incident are far-reaching. Not only does it undermine the credibility of the journalists involved, but it also erodes public trust in the media as a whole. In an era where misinformation and fake news run rampant, it is more important than ever for journalists to uphold the principles of truth and accuracy.

As consumers of news and information, it is our responsibility to question the sources of the information we receive. It is not enough to simply accept what is presented to us at face value. We must be diligent in our efforts to verify the accuracy of the information we consume and to hold journalists accountable for their reporting.

In light of this incident, it is clear that there is still much work to be done in the field of journalism. Journalists must take the time to conduct thorough research and fact-checking before publishing stories. They must be vigilant in their efforts to uphold the highest standards of integrity and accuracy.

As for the public, we must remain vigilant in our consumption of news and information. We must question the sources of the information we receive and demand transparency and accountability from journalists. By working together, we can help ensure that the truth prevails and that misinformation is kept at bay.

In conclusion, the recent example of failed fact-checking involving three journalists serves as a stark reminder of the importance of upholding the highest standards of integrity and accuracy in journalism. It is a call to action for journalists to conduct thorough research and verification before publishing stories, and for the public to remain vigilant in their consumption of news and information. Only by working together can we ensure that the truth prevails and misinformation is kept in check..

Here’s an example of failed fact-checking with THREE different journalists.

First, we KNOW where the investigation into Michael Cohen came from, bc those warrants have been unsealed (thanks in part to media coalition including NYT). It came from a SAR based off big $$ payments… pic.twitter.com/Z4fesUOihV

— emptywheel (synonym: foil) (@emptywheel) May 31, 2024

Source

emptywheel said Here's an example of failed fact-checking with THREE different journalists.

First, we KNOW where the investigation into Michael Cohen came from, bc those warrants have been unsealed (thanks in part to media coalition including NYT). It came from a SAR based off big $$ payments

RELATED STORY.