CJI States that Recommendation of Constituent Assembly was not Binding on President

In a significant development, the Chief Justice of India (CJI) has stated that the recommendation of the constituent assembly was not binding on the President. The CJI made this statement while addressing a gathering at a legal conference on Wednesday.

The CJI clarified that the constituent assembly was never intended to be a permanent body and was only meant to operate during a transitional period. Therefore, when the constituent assembly ceased to exist, the special conditions that accompanied its recommendations also lapsed.

The statement by the CJI has sparked a debate among legal experts and scholars. Some argue that the recommendation of the constituent assembly should be considered binding as it was a representative body that played a crucial role in drafting the constitution. Others believe that the CJI’s interpretation is in line with the constitutional principles and the intent of the framers.

The constituent assembly, which was formed in 1946, consisted of representatives from various political parties and communities. Its primary task was to draft a constitution for the newly independent country. The assembly spent several years deliberating and consulting with experts before finalizing the constitution in 1950.

One of the key issues raised in the debate is the extent of the constituent assembly’s authority. While it is widely accepted that the assembly had the power to make recommendations, there is no clarity on whether those recommendations were binding on the President. The CJI’s statement provides some guidance on this matter but does not settle the issue conclusively.

Legal experts argue that the constitution itself does not explicitly mention whether the constituent assembly’s recommendations are binding or not. This ambiguity has led to differing interpretations over the years. Some legal scholars believe that the President has the discretion to accept or reject the assembly’s recommendations, while others argue that the President is bound by them.

The CJI’s statement has also raised questions about the role of the judiciary in interpreting the constitution. Critics argue that the judiciary should not interfere in matters that are within the purview of the executive. They contend that the President, as the head of the executive, should have the final say on matters related to the constitution.

However, supporters of the CJI’s statement argue that the judiciary has a crucial role to play in upholding the constitution and ensuring its proper interpretation. They believe that the judiciary’s independence and expertise make it best suited to resolve such constitutional disputes.

The debate surrounding the constituent assembly’s recommendations and their binding nature is expected to continue in legal and academic circles. It remains to be seen how this interpretation by the CJI will impact future decisions and legal proceedings.

In conclusion, the CJI’s statement regarding the non-binding nature of the constituent assembly’s recommendations on the President has ignited a debate among legal experts. While some argue that the recommendations should be considered binding, others support the CJI’s interpretation. The role of the judiciary in interpreting the constitution has also come under scrutiny. This debate is likely to shape future discussions and legal proceedings on constitutional matters..

#BREAKING: CJI says: Recommendation of the constituent assembly was not binding on the President. Constituent assembly was never intended to be permanent body and it was to operate in a period of transition. When the constituent assembly ceased to exist, the special condition for…

— Aditya Raj Kaul (@AdityaRajKaul) December 11, 2023

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Source

@AdityaRajKaul said #BREAKING: CJI says: Recommendation of the constituent assembly was not binding on the President. Constituent assembly was never intended to be permanent body and it was to operate in a period of transition. When the constituent assembly ceased to exist, the special condition for… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

RELATED STORY.