Supreme Court Refuses to Provide CTC for Labour Party and Peter Obi’s Case against Tinubu, Shettima, and APC

Supreme Court Refuses to Provide CTC for Labour Party and Peter Obi’s Case Against Tinubu, Shettima, and APC

BREAKING:

The Supreme Court up until today HAS REFUSED to provide any CTC for the judgment of Labour Party and Peter Obi’s case against Tinubu, Shettima and APC.

Remember that on Oct 26, 2023, we were all at the Supreme Court for judgement.
The Supreme Court only proceeded to… pic.twitter.com/djXIa2zw5C

— SERAH IBRAHIM (@TheSerahIbrahim) November 28, 2023

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Supreme Court Denies CTC for Labour Party and Peter Obi’s Case against Tinubu, Shettima, and APC

The Supreme Court has recently faced criticism for its refusal to provide a Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgment in the case between the Labour Party and Peter Obi against Bola Tinubu, Kashim Shettima, and the All Progressives Congress (APC). This decision has raised concerns about transparency and accountability within the Nigerian judicial system.

The controversy stems from an incident that took place on October 26, 2023, when the nation eagerly awaited the Supreme Court’s judgment in this high-profile case. The case involved allegations of electoral malpractice and corruption against Tinubu, Shettima, and the APC during the 2023 general elections.

After months of legal battles and public anticipation, the Supreme Court finally delivered its judgment. However, to the disappointment of many, the court refused to provide a CTC of the judgment, thereby preventing the public from accessing the detailed reasoning and legal arguments behind the decision.

This lack of transparency has sparked outrage among supporters of the Labour Party and Peter Obi, who believe that the denial of the CTC undermines the principles of justice and fairness. It also raises questions about the accountability of the Supreme Court and its commitment to upholding the rule of law.

Critics argue that denying access to the judgment hinders public scrutiny and prevents meaningful discussions about the validity and impartiality of the court’s decision. They argue that transparency is crucial in maintaining public trust in the judicial system and ensuring that justice is served.

In response to the controversy, SERAH IBRAHIM, a prominent Nigerian activist, took to Twitter to express her concerns. She highlighted the Supreme Court’s refusal to provide a CTC and shared a tweet from November 28, 2023, in which she criticized the court’s decision. The tweet, which included a link to an image, quickly gained traction on social media platforms.

The Supreme Court’s decision has also raised questions about the broader issue of judicial independence in Nigeria. Some critics argue that the court’s refusal to provide a CTC could be seen as an attempt to shield the ruling party and its members from public scrutiny.

As the controversy continues to unfold, there is a growing call for the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision and provide a CTC of the judgment. The public’s right to access information and understand the reasoning behind judicial decisions should be upheld to ensure the transparency and accountability of the Nigerian judicial system..

Source

@TheSerahIbrahim said BREAKING: The Supreme Court up until today HAS REFUSED to provide any CTC for the judgment of Labour Party and Peter Obi’s case against Tinubu, Shettima and APC. Remember that on Oct 26, 2023, we were all at the Supreme Court for judgement. The Supreme Court only proceeded to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

RELATED STORY.