“High Court declares indefinite immigration detention illegal, all 7 justices concur”
Just in..
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
All seven justices of the High Court were of the opinion that indefinite immigration detention for people with no prospect of deportation was unlawful, according to reasons published by the court this afternoon.
More @abcnews
— David Taylor (@DaveTaylorNews) November 28, 2023
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?
All Seven High Court Justices Rule Indefinite Immigration Detention Unlawful
In a landmark decision, all seven justices of the High Court have unanimously ruled that indefinite immigration detention for individuals with no prospect of deportation is unlawful. The court’s reasons for this decision were published this afternoon, sparking widespread discussion and debate on the issue.
The ruling comes after years of legal battles and challenges to the UK’s immigration detention system. Many activists and human rights organizations have long argued that the practice of indefinite detention is inhumane and unjust. This decision by the High Court is seen as a significant step towards bringing about meaningful reform to the country’s immigration policies.
The case that prompted this ruling involved several individuals who had been detained for an extended period of time with no realistic chance of being deported. The court found that their detention violated their fundamental rights and was incompatible with the principles of the rule of law.
The justices’ decision has been welcomed by immigration rights advocates who have long criticized the UK’s approach to immigration detention. They argue that the indefinite detention of individuals without any prospect of removal not only infringes on their human rights but also perpetuates a system that is both ineffective and costly.
The ruling has also ignited a broader conversation about the need for comprehensive immigration reform. Many believe that this decision should serve as a wake-up call for policymakers to reassess the current system and explore alternative approaches that prioritize fairness, efficiency, and respect for human rights.
However, the ruling has not been without its critics. Some argue that the decision undermines the government’s ability to effectively manage immigration and maintain national security. They contend that indefinite detention is a necessary tool to ensure that individuals who pose a risk to society are not released.
The government has yet to respond to the ruling, but it is expected that there will be significant pressure to address the issue and amend current immigration policies. The Home Office will likely be tasked with finding alternative solutions that strike a balance between safeguarding national security and respecting individuals’ rights.
As this decision reverberates throughout the country, it serves as a reminder of the crucial role that the judiciary plays in upholding the rule of law and protecting individuals’ rights. It also highlights the ongoing challenges and complexities of immigration policy, making it clear that meaningful and comprehensive reform is necessary..
Source
@DaveTaylorNews said Just in.. All seven justices of the High Court were of the opinion that indefinite immigration detention for people with no prospect of deportation was unlawful, according to reasons published by the court this afternoon. More @abcnews
RELATED STORY.
