“36 Free Speech Groups Urge Congress to Block Funding for Biased Web Cop NewsGuard”
BREAKING: 36 Free Speech Groups Call on Congress To Block Funding for Biased Web Cop NewsGuardhttps://t.co/KQZypmxylX
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) November 27, 2023
https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js
Title: 36 Free Speech Groups Demand Congress to Block Funding for Biased Web Cop NewsGuard
In a significant development, 36 free speech advocacy groups have come together to call on Congress to block funding for NewsGuard, a web cop service accused of biased reporting. The groups argue that the organization’s lack of objectivity threatens the fundamental principles of free speech and fair reporting.
You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?
The coalition, spearheaded by prominent journalist Paul Sperry, took to Twitter to announce their collective stance. In a tweet, Sperry shared a link to an article highlighting the concerns surrounding NewsGuard’s credibility. The article alleges that the service has shown bias in its reporting, prompting concerns about the potential impact on public discourse.
NewsGuard, a browser extension that analyzes news websites for reliability and transparency, has come under scrutiny for allegedly favoring certain political ideologies. Critics argue that the service employs a subjective approach in labeling news outlets as reliable or unreliable, potentially stifling dissenting voices.
The coalition of free speech groups claims that NewsGuard’s subjective labeling of news sources undermines its credibility as a neutral arbiter. They argue that the organization’s funding should be blocked, as it could inadvertently suppress alternative viewpoints and limit access to diverse sources of information.
The call to Congress comes at a time when concerns about the impact of biased reporting on public opinion are growing. Advocates for free speech argue that platforms like NewsGuard should not have the power to determine what news is reliable or unreliable, as this could lead to the suppression of dissenting voices and the promotion of a single narrative.
NewsGuard has responded to the allegations, asserting that its methodology is objective and transparent. They argue that their evaluations are based on a set of nine criteria, including the disclosure of ownership and funding, and do not take into account political bias. The organization maintains that it is committed to promoting trustworthy journalism and helping users make informed decisions.
However, critics remain skeptical, pointing out specific instances where NewsGuard has labeled certain outlets as unreliable without sufficient evidence. They argue that this approach raises questions about the organization’s ability to remain impartial and unbiased.
As the debate surrounding NewsGuard’s funding intensifies, it remains to be seen how Congress will respond to the demands of the coalition of free speech groups. The outcome of this issue will likely have far-reaching implications for the future of journalism and the protection of free speech in the digital age..
Source
@paulsperry_ said BREAKING: 36 Free Speech Groups Call on Congress To Block Funding for Biased Web Cop NewsGuard reclaimthenet.org/free-speech-gr…
RELATED STORY.
