A police tech company that previously proposed making Taser drones for schools, claiming it would “save lives” during shootings, is continuing to develop the technology despite the resignation of nearly the entire ethics board. The company’s actions have raised concerns about the potential ethical implications.
Last year, a police tech company shared a plan to make Taser drones for schools. It said they’d “save lives” in the case of a shooting.
You may also like to watch : Who Is Kamala Harris? Biography - Parents - Husband - Sister - Career - Indian - Jamaican Heritage
Nearly the whole ethics board resigned in response.
But the company seems to be making the tech anyway. NEW w/ @WIRED: https://t.co/esqE0U1UzN
— The Markup (@themarkup) September 8, 2023
You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?
In a shocking revelation, a police tech company has announced its plan to develop Taser drones for schools, claiming that this technology could potentially save lives in the event of a shooting. However, this announcement has sparked widespread controversy, leading to the resignation of nearly the entire ethics board.
The company’s proposal to introduce Taser drones as a security measure in educational institutions quickly drew backlash from various quarters. Concerns were raised about the potential misuse of such drones, as well as the ethical implications of deploying weapons in a school environment. As a result, numerous members of the ethics board overseeing the police tech company’s operations have chosen to step down in protest.
Despite the significant backlash and resignations, it appears that the company is determined to move forward with its plans. The controversial technology is still being developed, raising further concerns about the potential consequences and unintended outcomes of its implementation.
Critics argue that the introduction of Taser drones in schools could lead to an escalation of violence and a militarization of educational spaces. They argue that alternative approaches, such as investing in comprehensive mental health support and implementing non-violent conflict resolution methods, should be prioritized instead.
As this issue continues to unfold, it remains to be seen whether the company will face further opposition or if it will succeed in implementing its controversial technology. The debate surrounding the use of drones in schools is likely to intensify, prompting a broader discussion about the balance between security and civil liberties..
