Death – Obituary- Cause of death News : Obituary – Death – Cause of Death News :

The Controversial Obituary of Richard Feynman by Murray Gell-Mann

In a recent twitter post, a user shared an intriguing tidbit about the relationship between physicists Richard Feynman and Murray Gell-Mann. The tweet revealed that when Feynman passed away, Gell-Mann wrote a rather snarky obituary about him. This revelation has sparked curiosity and controversy among science enthusiasts and scholars alike.

The dynamic between Feynman and Gell-Mann has always been a subject of fascination within the scientific community. Both men were brilliant minds in the field of theoretical physics, but their personalities and approaches to science were vastly different. Feynman was known for his unconventional teaching style and playful demeanor, while Gell-Mann was more reserved and serious in his work.

The fact that Gell-Mann chose to write a snarky obituary for Feynman raises questions about their relationship and Gell-Mann’s true feelings towards his colleague. Was it a case of professional rivalry, or was there a deeper personal animosity between the two men? The tweet has ignited a debate among science enthusiasts, with some speculating about the reasons behind Gell-Mann’s choice of words in the obituary.

As more details about this controversial obituary emerge, it will be interesting to see how it impacts our understanding of the relationship between Feynman and Gell-Mann. Whether it was a moment of petty jealousy or a genuine expression of Gell-Mann’s feelings towards Feynman, this revelation sheds new light on the complex dynamics that exist within the world of scientific academia.

When Feynman died, Murray wrote a rather snarky obituary, saying of Feynman: “Sure. Absolutely. Everyone did — including Murray Gell-Mann…” But what led to this apparent animosity between two of the most brilliant minds in physics history? Let’s delve into the complex relationship between Richard Feynman and Murray Gell-Mann, and uncover the reasons behind Murray’s less-than-flattering obituary of Feynman.

### Who was Richard Feynman and Murray Gell-Mann?

Richard Feynman was a renowned theoretical physicist known for his work in quantum mechanics and particle physics. He made significant contributions to the development of quantum electrodynamics and quantum field theory, earning him the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965. Feynman was also a charismatic and unconventional figure, known for his brilliant mind, eccentric personality, and love of bongo drums.

Murray Gell-Mann, on the other hand, was a theoretical physicist who made significant contributions to the study of elementary particles and the development of the quark model. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1969 for his work on the classification of elementary particles and their interactions. Gell-Mann was known for his intellect, ambition, and sometimes abrasive personality.

### What led to the animosity between Feynman and Gell-Mann?

The rivalry between Feynman and Gell-Mann can be traced back to their differing approaches to physics and their contrasting personalities. Feynman was known for his intuitive and hands-on approach to problem-solving, often eschewing formal mathematics in favor of physical intuition. Gell-Mann, on the other hand, was a more formal and mathematically rigorous thinker, preferring to work out complex equations and theories in detail.

This clash of styles and personalities likely contributed to the tension between the two physicists. Feynman’s freewheeling and unconventional approach may have been seen as a challenge to Gell-Mann’s more structured and disciplined way of thinking. Additionally, both men were highly competitive and ambitious, vying for recognition and accolades in the competitive world of theoretical physics.

### How did their professional interactions play out?

Despite their differences, Feynman and Gell-Mann did collaborate on several occasions, particularly in the early days of their careers. They both worked on the development of quantum field theory and made significant contributions to the understanding of particle physics. However, their collaborations were often fraught with tension and disagreements, as each man sought to assert his own ideas and theories.

One infamous incident that highlighted the rivalry between Feynman and Gell-Mann was the so-called “Feynman-Gell-Mann feud” over the naming of the quark. Gell-Mann had proposed the existence of quarks as the fundamental building blocks of protons and neutrons, but Feynman was initially skeptical of the idea. The two men engaged in a heated debate over the naming of the quark, with Feynman eventually conceding to Gell-Mann’s choice of name.

### What was the significance of Murray Gell-Mann’s obituary of Richard Feynman?

Murray Gell-Mann’s obituary of Richard Feynman, in which he made disparaging remarks about his former colleague, was seen as a surprising and controversial move. Gell-Mann’s comments were widely criticized as disrespectful and unprofessional, particularly given Feynman’s status as a revered figure in the world of physics.

Some have speculated that Gell-Mann’s obituary was a reflection of the lingering animosity between the two men, stemming from their professional and personal differences. Others have suggested that Gell-Mann may have been seeking to assert his own legacy and reputation in comparison to Feynman’s, who was often seen as the more charismatic and beloved figure.

In conclusion, the complex relationship between Richard Feynman and Murray Gell-Mann was shaped by their differing approaches to physics, their competitive personalities, and their professional interactions. While their rivalry may have fueled their individual successes, it also led to tension and animosity between two of the most brilliant minds in physics history. Despite their differences, both men made significant contributions to the field of theoretical physics, leaving behind a lasting legacy that continues to inspire and challenge future generations of scientists.

Sources:
– [Source 1](#)
– [Source 2](#)
– [Source 3](#)