By | March 8, 2024

The J6 Committee Controversy: Missing Interviews and Changing Testimonies

In a recent tweet by Julie Kelly, a journalist known for her coverage of political events in the United States, shocking revelations have come to light regarding the J6 committee’s handling of witness interviews. According to Kelly, the committee destroyed all video interviews with witnesses and failed to make hundreds of written transcripts available to the public. Additionally, key figures such as Chris Wray and Steve D’Antuono were never interviewed, raising questions about the thoroughness and transparency of the committee’s investigation.

The J6 committee, officially known as the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, was formed in the aftermath of the violent insurrection that took place on January 6, 2021. The committee’s primary mandate is to investigate the events leading up to and during the attack, as well as to identify any individuals or groups responsible for planning or inciting the violence.

The revelation that the committee destroyed all video interviews with witnesses is deeply concerning, as video evidence can often provide crucial insights into the events that transpired. Without access to these recordings, the public is left in the dark about what witnesses may have said and how their testimonies may have influenced the committee’s findings.

Similarly, the failure to make written transcripts of witness interviews available raises serious questions about the committee’s commitment to transparency. Written transcripts can provide a detailed record of witness statements, allowing the public to assess the credibility of the information provided. By withholding these transcripts, the committee is effectively limiting the public’s ability to fully understand the scope and nature of its investigation.

The fact that key figures such as Chris Wray, the former Director of the FBI, and Steve D’Antuono, the former Chief of the Washington FBI field office, were never interviewed by the committee is also troubling. Both individuals held senior positions within the FBI at the time of the attack and may have had valuable insights to share about the events of January 6th. The committee’s failure to interview these individuals raises questions about whether it conducted a thorough and comprehensive investigation.

In addition to these revelations, Julie Kelly also highlighted the case of Cassidy Hutchinson, a witness whose testimony reportedly changed over the course of the committee’s investigation. While it is not uncommon for witness testimonies to evolve as new information comes to light, the fact that Hutchinson’s testimony changed raises questions about the reliability of the committee’s findings. If witnesses are changing their stories or providing conflicting information, it calls into question the accuracy and integrity of the committee’s investigation.

Overall, the revelations made by Julie Kelly in her tweet paint a troubling picture of the J6 committee’s handling of witness interviews and testimonies. By destroying video interviews, withholding written transcripts, failing to interview key figures, and allowing witness testimonies to change, the committee has raised serious concerns about the integrity and transparency of its investigation. As the committee continues its work, it will be important for the public to closely monitor its actions and hold its members accountable for conducting a thorough and impartial investigation..

Source

julie_kelly2 said J6 committee destroyed all the video interviews with witnesses. Hundreds of written transcripts never made available.

J6 committee never interviewed Chris Wray or Washington FBI field office chief Steve D’Antuono

Cassidy Hutchinson changed her testimony.

Capitol and DC police…

RELATED STORY.