In a shocking turn of events, activist Natasha Narwal has been granted bail in a case that has been stayed by the Supreme Court. Despite this bail, she is still required to remain in custody and under surveillance, as well as pay a substantial amount of money. This situation raises serious questions about the legal system and the justice system as a whole.
The case in question has been dragging on for years, with no end in sight. Natasha Narwal has been fighting tirelessly for her freedom, only to be met with more obstacles and challenges along the way. The fact that she has been granted bail, yet still has to remain in custody, is a clear example of the absurdity of the situation.
What makes this even more egregious is the fact that decades down the line, a court may ultimately rule that there is no evidence against her. This raises the question of why she has been subjected to such harsh treatment and surveillance in the first place. It also brings into question the validity and fairness of the legal system in India.
Natasha Narwal is a prominent activist who has been at the forefront of several important social justice movements. She has been a vocal advocate for the rights of marginalized communities and has worked tirelessly to bring about positive change in society. Her arrest and subsequent treatment by the legal system have sparked outrage and concern among her supporters and fellow activists.
The fact that she has been granted bail, yet is still required to remain in custody, is a clear violation of her rights. It is a blatant abuse of power and a clear example of the injustices that are prevalent within the legal system. The fact that she is being forced to pay exorbitant amounts of money for her surveillance only adds insult to injury.
The Supreme Court’s decision to stay the case only adds to the confusion and frustration surrounding Natasha Narwal’s situation. It raises questions about why the case has been stalled for so long and why she is still being subjected to such harsh treatment. The fact that there may ultimately be no evidence against her only adds to the sense of injustice and unfairness that she is facing.
As the case continues to unfold, it is clear that Natasha Narwal’s fight for justice is far from over. She will continue to face challenges and obstacles in her quest for freedom and vindication. Her supporters and fellow activists will continue to stand by her side, demanding justice and fairness in her case.
In conclusion, the situation surrounding Natasha Narwal’s case is a clear example of the absurdity and injustice that can exist within the legal system. The fact that she has been granted bail, yet is still required to remain in custody and under surveillance, is a gross violation of her rights. As the case continues to unfold, it is clear that she will continue to fight for justice and fairness, no matter the obstacles in her way..
This is as absurd as it gets. He has been granted bail in the case which continues to be stayed by the Supreme Court. So he has to continue to be in custody and surveillance and pay crores of rupees for it.
Then decades later a court will say there is no evidence. https://t.co/3NfEznXnUD— Natasha Narwal (@natasha_narwal) March 8, 2024
Source
natasha_narwal said This is as absurd as it gets. He has been granted bail in the case which continues to be stayed by the Supreme Court. So he has to continue to be in custody and surveillance and pay crores of rupees for it.
Then decades later a court will say there is no evidence.
RELATED STORY.