– “Ahmadi4Peace claims”
– “StudentOfAhmad’s claims”.
By Trend News Line 2024-02-05 03:47:03.
Title: The Controversial Claims and Mysterious Passing of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
Introduction:
In a recent tweet, Azaharie Ben Yahya (@bahlul_majnun) questions the credibility of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the founder of the Ahmadiyya movement, based on his interpretation of the term “baa’di” and its implications for the death of prophets. This article delves into the controversy surrounding Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s claims and explores the unknown cause of his passing.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s Claim:
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad proclaimed himself as the promised Messiah and Mahdi, as well as a subordinate prophet after the death of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). However, Azaharie Ben Yahya argues that the term “baa’di,” which means “after” in Arabic, signifies that there will be no prophet after the demise of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). Therefore, he accuses Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of being a liar for making such claims.
Controversial Interpretations:
The interpretation of the term “baa’di” has sparked debates among scholars and religious sects for centuries. Some argue that it exclusively refers to the absence of any new prophets after the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), while others believe it allows room for the emergence of subordinate prophets. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s followers assert that his prophethood is within the scope of this interpretation.
The Impact of the “Baa’di” Argument:
Azaharie Ben Yahya’s tweet suggests that using the “baa’di” argument to claim that Jesus (peace be upon him) has passed away does not affect Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s credibility. However, this statement does not provide further evidence or explanations to support this assertion. It remains a topic of discussion among scholars and followers of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.
The Mysterious Passing:
As of the time of this reporting, the cause of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s death remains unknown. This lack of information further fuels the controversy surrounding his claim of being a prophet. Some believe that the ambiguity surrounding his passing raises doubts about his authenticity, while others argue that it is irrelevant to his prophethood.
Conclusion:
The controversy surrounding Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s claims and the interpretation of the term “baa’di” continues to be a subject of debate among religious scholars and individuals. While Azaharie Ben Yahya criticizes Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s interpretation, it is important to note that the cause of his death remains unknown at the time of this reporting. The complexities surrounding these discussions highlight the intricacies of religious interpretations and the diverse perspectives within the Islamic community..
Source : @bahlul_majnun
His claims no longer stand since it is established that la nabiyya baa’di لا نبي بعدي baa’di mean after death according to u. Means after Rasulullah ﷺ death there will be no Nabi. Therefore, Mirza is a liar. Using baa’di argument to show Isa عليه السلام has died does not impact…
— Azaharie Ben Yahya (@bahlul_majnun) February 5, 2024
– “la nabiyya baa’di” meaning “no prophet after me”
– “Isa عليه السلام has died”.