Shocking Admission: Pakistan’s Military Manipulates Courts & Media

Stunning admission by military-backed journalist @najamsethi ! He revealed on TV that Pakistan's military controls courts, judges, and media. They banked on Trump losing the US election to complete their agenda.

Now, they're resorting to buying influence in Trump's team with https://t.co/Xy8LsBO8wj

In a recent revelation, military-backed journalist Najam Sethi made a stunning admission on live television regarding the significant influence of Pakistan’s military over the country’s judicial system, media, and political landscape. This admission sheds light on the deep-rooted connections between military power and civilian institutions in Pakistan, raising eyebrows and prompting discussions about the implications for democracy in the region.

### The Influence of Pakistan’s Military

Sethi’s comments highlighted a critical issue: the military’s control extends beyond direct governance into the very fabric of Pakistan’s judicial and media systems. This revelation suggests that judges and court proceedings may not operate independently but rather under the influence of military authorities. Such control can undermine the rule of law and erode public trust in judicial processes, leading to a perception of bias and manipulation.

### Political Maneuvering and International Relations

Further complicating the situation, Sethi indicated that the Pakistani military had anticipated a specific outcome in the U.S. elections, banking on former President Donald Trump losing his position. This anticipation suggests that the military’s strategies are not merely reactive but rather proactive, aiming to align their domestic agenda with international political developments. The military’s reliance on foreign political dynamics raises concerns about the sovereignty of Pakistan’s governance and the potential for external influence on its policies.

### Buying Influence in Trump’s Circle

In an unexpected twist, Sethi’s admission pointed to the military’s attempt to secure influence within Trump’s political team. This strategy of buying influence highlights the lengths to which the military may go to achieve its objectives, potentially compromising the integrity of both U.S. politics and Pakistan’s foreign relations. Such actions could have far-reaching implications, affecting bilateral relations and strategic partnerships.

### Implications for Democracy in Pakistan

The revelations made by Sethi are particularly troubling for advocates of democracy in Pakistan. The intertwining of military power with judicial and media institutions poses a significant threat to democratic governance. If the military can manipulate these critical pillars of democracy, the prospects for political pluralism, human rights, and freedom of expression may be severely compromised. This situation demands urgent attention from both domestic and international observers who value democratic principles.

### Conclusion

Najam Sethi’s admission serves as a wake-up call for Pakistan and the international community. The revelations about the military’s control over courts, judges, and media illustrate the challenges faced in fostering a democratic society in Pakistan. As the military seeks to influence foreign political landscapes, particularly in the context of U.S. politics, the implications for Pakistan’s sovereignty and democratic integrity become increasingly concerning. It is crucial for civil society, political leaders, and international actors to engage in discussions aimed at promoting transparency, accountability, and genuine democratic practices in Pakistan. The need for reform and the establishment of independent institutions has never been more pressing, as the future of Pakistan’s democracy hangs in the balance.

Stunning admission by military-backed journalist @najamsethi ! He revealed on TV that Pakistan’s military controls courts, judges, and media. They banked on Trump losing the US election to complete their agenda.

Now, they’re resorting to buying influence in Trump’s team with… pic.twitter.com/Xy8LsBO8wj

— Dr. Shahbaz GiLL (@SHABAZGIL) December 28, 2024

Stunning Admission by Military-Backed Journalist @najamsethi

In a recent televised interview, military-backed journalist @najamsethi made a stunning admission that has caught the attention of many. He revealed that Pakistan’s military exerts control over the country’s courts, judges, and media. This revelation raises significant questions about the independence of these institutions and the implications for Pakistan’s democracy.

When a journalist of Najam Sethi’s stature speaks out, it’s hard to ignore. His insights bring to light the intricate relationship between the military and various sectors in Pakistan, suggesting a level of influence that undermines the foundations of justice and freedom of the press. The notion that military influence extends into the judicial system is alarming, to say the least. It paints a picture of a country where the rule of law is secondary to the whims of military leadership.

Pakistan’s Military Agenda and U.S. Politics

Sethi also mentioned that the military was banking on Donald Trump losing the U.S. election to fulfill its agenda. The idea that foreign powers, including Pakistan’s military, would manipulate or influence U.S. politics is a serious allegation. It indicates a broader strategy where international relations can be influenced by political outcomes, raising issues of sovereignty and national interest.

This connection between Pakistan’s military and American politics suggests a calculated approach to international relations. If the military believed that a Trump loss would advance its objectives, it gives insight into the lengths they might go to achieve their goals. The military’s reliance on external political shifts to bolster its internal strategies reveals a complex interplay of domestic and international politics.

Buying Influence in Trump’s Team

In light of these revelations, Sethi noted that the military is now resorting to buying influence within Trump’s team. This admission raises eyebrows and prompts a slew of questions about the ethical implications of such actions. How far will the military go to secure its interests? What does this mean for the U.S.-Pakistan relationship moving forward?

The practice of buying influence is not new in the political arena, but when it involves foreign entities and military institutions, it becomes a matter of national security. The potential for corruption and the undermining of democratic processes is a significant concern. It begs the question: how can democratic institutions remain stable when military forces engage in manipulative tactics to assert control?

The Role of Media in Shaping Narratives

Sethi’s revelations underscore the role of media in shaping public perception and narratives. If the military controls media outlets, then the information disseminated to the public could be skewed to serve military interests rather than the truth. This manipulation of information can create a populace that is misinformed or unaware of the realities of their situation.

In an age where information is readily available, the power of narrative cannot be underestimated. Media serves as a vital tool in educating citizens and holding institutions accountable. However, when that media is compromised, the consequences can be dire. Citizens may find themselves in a cycle of misinformation, leading to a weakened democracy.

Implications for Pakistan’s Democracy

The implications of these admissions are profound. A military that controls courts, judges, and media is a direct threat to the democratic fabric of Pakistan. It poses questions about the legitimacy of the legal system and the freedom of expression. Citizens should be able to trust that their rights are protected by an independent judiciary, free from military influence.

Moreover, the potential for military intervention in political processes can lead to instability. A healthy democracy thrives on the separation of powers and checks and balances. When the military oversteps its boundaries, it compromises these fundamental principles, leading to a cycle of power struggles that can destabilize the nation.

Public Reaction and Future Outlook

Public reaction to Sethi’s revelations has been mixed. While many are alarmed by the implications, others may view it as a continuation of long-standing issues within Pakistan. The challenge lies in mobilizing public opinion to demand accountability and transparency from both military and political leaders.

As citizens become more aware of these dynamics, there is hope for a more engaged and informed populace. Advocacy for media freedom, judicial independence, and political transparency will be crucial in shaping the future of Pakistan. The path forward may be fraught with challenges, but with a collective voice, change is possible.

In conclusion, Najam Sethi’s admission serves as a wake-up call for Pakistan and its citizens. The intertwining of military and political power, especially in relation to foreign influence, poses a significant threat to the country’s democratic landscape. As the world watches, the question remains: how will Pakistan navigate this complex web of influence and power to secure a brighter future for its democracy?