New Evidence: AP Suppressed UBS’s $400M Investment in Dominion

Remember crooked voting machines from DOMINION?

Well there is New evidence mounting
that the Associated Press killed a story
about UBS Beijing infusing
$400 million into Dominion
one month before the 2020 election

New Evidence Surrounding Dominion Voting Machines and Election Integrity

In a recent tweet, Josh Dunlap raised a significant concern regarding the integrity of the 2020 election, specifically addressing the controversial Dominion Voting Systems. He cited new evidence suggesting that the Associated Press may have suppressed a critical story involving a substantial financial infusion into Dominion by UBS Beijing, amounting to $400 million just one month before the election. This revelation has ignited discussions about the reliability of voting technology and the potential conflicts of interest that could influence electoral outcomes.

The mention of “crooked voting machines” in the tweet highlights ongoing skepticism about the security and fairness of electronic voting systems, particularly Dominion, which has been at the center of numerous allegations since the 2020 presidential election. This skepticism is fueled by various conspiracy theories and claims of widespread voter fraud, despite a lack of substantial evidence to support these assertions.

As the controversy unfolds, it raises questions about the role of media organizations in reporting on pivotal issues that affect democratic processes. Dunlap’s statement implies that the Associated Press, a reputable news agency, potentially chose to withhold information that could have altered public perception or understanding of the voting technology used during the election. This situation emphasizes the critical need for transparency and accountability in both media and electoral institutions.

The financial connection between UBS Beijing and Dominion Voting Systems could suggest potential foreign influence in U.S. elections, a topic that has been heavily scrutinized in recent years. The prospect of foreign investments in American voting systems raises alarm bells regarding national security and the integrity of the electoral process. Such concerns are particularly relevant in today’s political climate, where trust in electoral systems is crucial for the functioning of democracy.

The implications of this new evidence are vast, potentially affecting public trust in voting technology and institutions. For many Americans, the integrity of elections is non-negotiable, and any hint of impropriety can have lasting repercussions on voter turnout and civic engagement. As discussions surrounding election integrity continue, it becomes vital for news organizations to provide comprehensive reporting that includes all relevant facts and perspectives.

Moreover, this situation may lead to calls for greater regulation and oversight of voting technology providers. As more information surfaces about financial ties and potential influences on voting systems, stakeholders, including policymakers and electoral officials, may need to reevaluate the frameworks governing voting technology to ensure that they are free from undue influence.

In conclusion, the allegations surrounding Dominion Voting Systems and the Associated Press’s potential role in suppressing critical information highlight the importance of transparency in electoral processes. As new evidence emerges, it is crucial for both the media and the electoral systems to maintain public trust by ensuring that all relevant information is accessible and that the integrity of elections is upheld. This situation serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between technology, media, and democracy, and the ongoing need for vigilance in protecting electoral integrity.

Remember crooked voting machines from DOMINION?

Well there is New evidence mounting
that the Associated Press killed a story
about UBS Beijing infusing
$400 million into Dominion
one month before the 2020 election pic.twitter.com/eUfB90vBHc

— JOSH DUNLAP (@JDunlap1974) February 13, 2025

Remember crooked voting machines from DOMINION?

Ah, the infamous crooked voting machines from DOMINION—a phrase that has echoed through political discussions since the tumultuous 2020 election. If you’re like many, you may still be scratching your head over the allegations and controversies surrounding these machines. What’s the real story? Well, it seems that as time passes, new evidence keeps surfacing, adding fuel to the fire of speculation. In fact, just recently, there have been claims that the Associated Press quashed a significant story just before the election. This story allegedly revealed that UBS Beijing infused a staggering $400 million into Dominion merely one month before the ballots were cast. So, what does this all mean for the integrity of our electoral process?

Well there is New evidence mounting

The phrase new evidence mounting might just be the perfect way to describe the ongoing saga surrounding Dominion Voting Systems. With every passing day, more reports seem to pop up, shedding light on various aspects of the company’s operations and its connections to powerful entities. This latest claim about UBS Beijing’s financial involvement raises some serious questions. What was the rationale behind such a massive investment, and how might it have impacted the electoral process? Many are left wondering if this was a mere business transaction or if there were deeper implications at play.

That the Associated Press killed a story

When it comes to journalism, few things are more damaging than the idea that a trusted news outlet would suppress information. The claim that the Associated Press killed a story about this significant financial injection has sparked outrage among those who believe in the sanctity of free press. If true, this would not only jeopardize the credibility of the Associated Press but also raise questions about the transparency of information that is crucial for an informed electorate. The implications are vast and could potentially shake the very foundation of public trust in media outlets.

About UBS Beijing infusing

So who exactly is UBS Beijing, and why does their involvement matter? UBS, a prominent global financial services company, has a significant presence in the Chinese market. The idea that they would choose to invest $400 million into Dominion just before a pivotal election is certainly eyebrow-raising. Was this investment meant to secure a foothold in the U.S. electoral landscape, or was it a simple business decision? The timing of this investment raises questions about its intentions and the possible influence it could wield over electoral outcomes.

$400 million into Dominion

Let’s talk numbers. A whopping $400 million is not just pocket change; it’s a significant amount that could change the course of a company’s trajectory. Dominion has often found itself at the center of controversy, and this financial backing could suggest a level of influence or control that many find troubling. How could such a financial boost potentially alter the landscape of voting technology in the U.S., especially during a time of heightened scrutiny and skepticism surrounding election integrity?

One month before the 2020 election

The timeline is critical here. Just one month before the 2020 election, emotions were running high, and tensions were palpable. This was a time when every vote counted, and many were concerned about the integrity of the voting process. The idea that a foreign entity could have a financial stake in a voting technology company at this crucial juncture raises alarm bells. Were safeguards in place to ensure that this investment did not compromise the electoral process? The questions are endless, and the stakes are high.

What does it mean for voters?

For the average voter, the implications of these revelations could be significant. The notion that crooked voting machines from Dominion might have been influenced by foreign money adds to the anxiety many feel about the electoral process. Voters deserve assurance that their votes count and that the systems in place are not swayed by external interests. This is especially crucial when trust in elections is already fragile.

The role of misinformation

In an age where misinformation can spread like wildfire, it’s essential to approach these claims with a critical eye. While the allegations surrounding Dominion and the Associated Press are serious, it’s important to differentiate between verified facts and speculative claims. The media plays a crucial role in this process, and how they report on these issues can shape public perception and trust.

Moving forward

As we look to the future, it’s essential to stay informed and engaged. The conversation surrounding crooked voting machines from DOMINION and the recent revelations about UBS Beijing’s investment is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. Understanding the implications of these developments is vital for ensuring the integrity of future elections. Whether you’re a concerned citizen or simply someone trying to make sense of the political landscape, staying informed will empower you to make educated decisions.

In conclusion, the saga of Dominion Voting Systems is far from over. With new evidence surfacing and claims of suppressed stories, it’s a reminder that the intersection of politics, finance, and technology is ever-complex. As we navigate through this intricate web, let’s continue to question, seek answers, and prioritize the integrity of our electoral process.

“`

This article is structured with HTML headings and paragraphs, ensuring SEO optimization while maintaining a conversational tone. The keywords related to the topic have been woven throughout the text, making it engaging and informative for readers.