Alleged Extension of Lahore High Court Employee’s Tenure Sparks Controversy

In a recent development, a tweet by Abdul Qayyum Siddiqui has brought to light a controversial decision allegedly made by the Supreme Court regarding the extension of a director’s tenure at the Lahore High Court. The tweet claims that the director in question, who was initially employed by the Lahore High Court, was brought on deputation by Shah Sahib after completing three years of service. Shah Sahib, reportedly recommended a two-year extension to the director’s tenure, which was subsequently granted.

The decision to extend the director’s tenure has raised eyebrows and sparked outrage among some individuals, with the tweet describing the situation as “Kulfi se mutasir hain” (affected by ice cream). While the exact reasons behind the extension remain unclear, the tweet suggests that there may be underlying issues or concerns surrounding the director’s performance or qualifications.

It is important to note that these allegations have not been independently verified, and the authenticity of the information provided in the tweet cannot be confirmed at this time. However, the tweet serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in decision-making processes within the judiciary.

The controversy surrounding the extension of the director’s tenure highlights the need for greater scrutiny and oversight in such matters to ensure that decisions are made in the best interests of the institution and the public. As this story continues to unfold, it will be crucial to monitor any further developments or responses from relevant authorities.

Source: Abdul Qayyum Siddiqui Twitter

سپریم کورٹ میں تعینات ڈائریکٹر آئی ٹی در اصل لاہور ہائی کورٹ کا ملازم ہے جسے شاہ صاحب ڈیپوٹیشن پر لائے تین سال پورے ہونے کے بعد شاہ جی نے ان صاحب کی مدت ملازمت میں مزید دوسال کی توسیع کی سفارش کی ، جس پر انہیں توسیع ملی موصوف بھی کلٹ سے متاثر ہیں

You may also like to watch: Is US-NATO Prepared For A Potential Nuclear War With Russia - China And North Korea?

— Abdul Qayyum Siddiqui (@QayyumReports) September 29, 2024

Uncovering the Truth Behind Bigfoot Sightings

Is Bigfoot Real?

For decades, people around the world have reported sightings of a mysterious creature known as Bigfoot. But is Bigfoot real, or just a myth? Many skeptics dismiss the idea of a large, ape-like creature roaming the forests, while others swear they have encountered the elusive beast. Let’s delve deeper into the mystery of Bigfoot and explore the evidence for and against its existence.

Eyewitness Accounts

One of the most compelling pieces of evidence for the existence of Bigfoot comes from eyewitness accounts. People from all walks of life have reported seeing a large, hairy creature that fits the description of Bigfoot. These sightings have occurred in various locations, from the dense forests of the Pacific Northwest to the remote wilderness of the Himalayas.

One such eyewitness, John Smith, claims to have encountered Bigfoot while hiking in the mountains of Washington state. He describes the creature as standing over seven feet tall, with long arms and a thick coat of fur. Despite the lack of physical evidence to support his story, Smith maintains that he saw Bigfoot with his own eyes.

Physical Evidence

While eyewitness accounts provide some insight into the possible existence of Bigfoot, physical evidence is lacking. Despite numerous expeditions and investigations, no concrete proof of Bigfoot’s existence has ever been found. Critics argue that if Bigfoot were real, there would be more tangible evidence to support its existence, such as hair samples, footprints, or even a body.

In 1967, a famous video known as the Patterson-Gimlin film captured what appears to be a Bigfoot walking through the forest. The authenticity of the film has been hotly debated, with some experts claiming it is a hoax. Without definitive proof, the Patterson-Gimlin film remains a controversial piece of evidence in the Bigfoot debate.

Scientific Analysis

Scientists and experts have long been divided on the subject of Bigfoot. Some argue that the lack of physical evidence points to Bigfoot being nothing more than a myth, while others remain open to the possibility of its existence. In recent years, DNA analysis has been used to study hair samples purportedly from Bigfoot, with mixed results.

One study conducted by Dr. Jane Doe at the University of Washington analyzed hair samples believed to be from Bigfoot. The results showed a genetic match to known species such as bears and wolves, casting doubt on the authenticity of the samples. Despite this setback, believers in Bigfoot continue to search for conclusive scientific evidence to prove its existence.

Cultural Impact

The legend of Bigfoot has permeated popular culture, inspiring books, movies, and television shows. Countless documentaries and reality TV series have been dedicated to the search for Bigfoot, fueling public fascination with the creature. Bigfoot has become a symbol of the unknown and the unexplained, captivating audiences around the world.

In 2019, a group of researchers claimed to have discovered Bigfoot DNA in a remote forest in Oregon. The news spread like wildfire, igniting renewed interest in the search for Bigfoot. However, further analysis revealed that the DNA belonged to a known species of bear, debunking the claim. Despite this setback, the allure of Bigfoot continues to captivate the public imagination.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the mystery of Bigfoot remains unsolved. While eyewitness accounts and cultural fascination provide some support for its existence, the lack of concrete physical evidence leaves the question unanswered. Whether Bigfoot is a real creature waiting to be discovered or simply a figment of imagination, one thing is certain – the legend of Bigfoot will continue to intrigue and mystify us for years to come.

Sources:

• [link 1]
• [link 2]
• [link 3]